Page 27 of 101

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 8:58 am
by wyvern blade
7/10
8/10

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 9:24 am
by dermetry
10/10 just because its made by you lol

8/10
9/10
10/10

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 9:37 am
by Jim
7/10
7/10
7/10

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 9:41 am
by dermetry
dermetry wrote:10/10 just because its made by you lol

8/10
9/10
10/10

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 8:51 am
by dermetry
Knock Knock whose their?

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 7:27 am
by semper
hmm.. they're not BAD and quite good actually...so I will say..

7/10.

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 2:41 pm
by Angnoch
the top two 8/10

the bottom one im gonna go with a 6/10

so your overall score SS from me is 7.4/10 :-)

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 2:53 pm
by ~Josh~
Ang Im only rating the sig, not the userbars ;)

8.5/10

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 12:39 am
by Solus
1st one is ok, but im not too big a fan of animated sigs..... and the rounded corners arent quite trimmed well, on a dark background the white pixels show up a bit.... 6/10

2nd one is ok, the one on the left is smaller yet by his shirt, hes in front, so perspective is shot. and the text could be better... (ie the text itself lighter, and less of a glow, maybe even a shadow instead? 7/10

3rd one is a little worse than the first one but not much. mainly because the animated part seems too choppy, and the text again glows too much. 6.8/10

~soul

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 7:15 pm
by Colton
I like your detailed feedback Soul :-D

As for the sig, not too sure what it deserves.. I'm not a big fan of it though :P

I don't see anything wrong with it, so 8.5/10 8)

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 4:36 pm
by ~[ Greased Gerbil ]~
If I tried to make a sig with rounded borders, it'd turn out all fuzzy and rubbish. Right angles are easy.

I like the background, it's interesting without being attention seeking. The Jack O'Neill pose in it is good, typifies his personality. But whenever somebody does that quotation marks gesture I fell like breaking their fingers.

It's simple, looks good and isn't trying too hard.

9.75


*G.G. now harboring a distinct sense of foreboding, seeing as though his own sig is a cut & paste job.*

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 6:37 am
by ~[ Greased Gerbil ]~
SuperSaiyan wrote:4/10

I find it too plain, but then again thats my style ;)


Yeah they're just quickly slapped together. I can't even decide which one I want to use. I thought I'd get bonus credit for the quote though. Maybe I'm not as funny as I thought.

I really like your first sig (the one made by nigatsuaka). Don't recognise the reference, but it looks awesome. I wish I could do animated sigs.

I give it 9.25

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 6:54 am
by [BoT] Jason
SuperSaiyan wrote:4/10

I find it too plain

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 7:05 am
by ~Sokar~
8/10 very nice ones

Re: Rate the Signature above you.

Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 7:32 am
by ~[ Greased Gerbil ]~
Very nice, L.D. I really like the simplicity. Normally yellow doesn't sit with me. But with yours it seems to be appropriate

8.5

BTW: I read your other thread regarding the sensitive nature of the sig. I personally see no prob with it. I'd think to have a problem, you'd need to read too deep into it.

I'm just cut that everyone else's sigs are 1,000,000 times better than mine.