Page 27 of 33

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 9:39 am
by BMMJ13
RepliMagni wrote:
thorsworld1 wrote:accept that 1 hit on a defended account (not 0 def account) = removal of defense


TAF have a 1-hit mass policy? Now that is ironic ;)

We have a return what we get policy. FS want to refuse to have any agreement and mass for 1 hit, and we can do the same back.

Halisstra wrote:This thread is beginning to sound like pure petty **Filtered**, come to a compromise or something gentlemen, it's boring me now

And by compromise I do not mean 'give us what we want or we'll sit on you'

^ no that was not a personal attack on anyone before I get lots of catty replies.


A compromise only works when both sides don't agree. As far as I see it, FS are either too inactive or too happy being statless to do anything different, and TA has no problems letting them be TA's 0 defense farms.

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:02 am
by Mathlord
Entire incoming logs from FS in the past 24 hours:

03:27 Madclown [ Forgotten Serenity - EvilClown] BrosÅn © [ Tauri Alliance - Death] ConquerPlanet 15 Win

Highest ranked FS player: 853.

I like having 11 farms to play with from time to time!

We've tried compromise before. Many times. We've tried it your way for years and years. Doesn't work. Now it's time to try it our way or accept your fate ;)

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:37 pm
by Lord Yojimbo
Mathlord wrote:Entire incoming logs from FS in the past 24 hours:

03:27 Madclown [ Forgotten Serenity - EvilClown] BrosÅn © [ Tauri Alliance - Death] ConquerPlanet 15 Win

Highest ranked FS player: 853.

I like having 11 farms to play with from time to time!

We've tried compromise before. Many times. We've tried it your way for years and years. Doesn't work. Now it's time to try it our way or accept your fate ;)


Stop taking all that tasty naq!! :smt019 :smt089 :razz: I wants some! :smt022 :razz:

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:44 pm
by Mathlord
Not a single defense...on PPT or off PPT...yay...

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:45 pm
by BMMJ13
Mathlord wrote:Not a single defense...on PPT or off PPT...yay...

Wasn't any earlier either. Makes you sad right? At least build your 15 bil defenses on ppt, we can't sab you there promise.

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:26 pm
by lilfish
Gogogo TA crush FS , you thro everthing or you thro nothing and step aside.... :smt043

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 12:43 am
by ~Les Erebus~
awesome team battle on me guys :D first time i had my stats at complete zero like ever!! I got Bor down to 3 bil def.. You guys are awesome log watchers.. Need to raid now it was an honor to get so much attention :smt060

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 2:32 am
by thorsworld1
Les Ennemis wrote:awesome team battle on me guys :D first time i had my stats at complete zero like ever!! I got Bor down to 3 bil def.. You guys are awesome log watchers.. Need to raid now it was an honor to get so much attention :smt060


Now thats the sort of battles and.... Attitude. That we like.

keep this up and this will be a good war to remember and if I may be so bold, with an attitude like that you should be the leader not 2ic, no doubt we would not be in this situation now if you were

Just my thoughts and oppinions as much as they count for LOL

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 2:54 am
by ~Les Erebus~
For the first time in awhile I had some fun on ascended..

Super Defence Planets Destroyed 416,709,891
Covert Planets Destroyed 0
Assassin Planets Destroyed 952,547,950
Grand Total of Planets Slaughtered 3,062,010,904
"lots more to come"

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:07 am
by R0B3RT
who is fs leader and start this suicide war ](*,)
is time to stop all this :-k

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:11 am
by Aisar Saqib
once again everyone off ppt is 0ed from FS

but would give appreciation to madclown and les.. for their attempts on us... :smt060

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 6:10 am
by dgb
Les Ennemis wrote:For the first time in awhile I had some fun on ascended..

Super Defence Planets Destroyed 416,709,891
Covert Planets Destroyed 0
Assassin Planets Destroyed 952,547,950
Grand Total of Planets Slaughtered 3,062,010,904
"lots more to come"


Ive given a bit more to my assended account so go have fun killing them wp to les.

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 6:13 am
by Drahazar
Just letting you all know...

NO leader of FS will ever sign a Perminant NAP and when they get threatened by Mathlord that if they don't TAF will sit on them till they do, that's still not likely to change, thank you.

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 6:39 am
by dgb
Drahazar wrote:Just letting you all know...

NO leader of FS will ever sign a Perminant NAP and when they get threatened by Mathlord that if they don't TAF will sit on them till they do, that's still not likely to change, thank you.


As was already said give and take by both sides and a good chat would be the way to go,now i dont no were the perminant nap comes from genraly wel say 3 or 4 month nap and if that works well lets talk about a extension, but you keep putting a brick wall up ie our way or the high way,this will harm your alliance more in the long run.

Re: FS vs TA

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 6:48 am
by Drahazar
dgb wrote:
Drahazar wrote:Just letting you all know...

NO leader of FS will ever sign a Perminant NAP and when they get threatened by Mathlord that if they don't TAF will sit on them till they do, that's still not likely to change, thank you.


As was already said give and take by both sides and a good chat would be the way to go,now i dont no were the perminant nap comes from genraly wel say 3 or 4 month nap and if that works well lets talk about a extension, but you keep putting a brick wall up ie our way or the high way,this will harm your alliance more in the long run.


I told Mathlord i was open to NAPs so long as they weren't permanent, he was the one who said no, not me.