StarGateWars Forums

Is it possible to scale the value based on the size of people in the house?

Like say the largest is 20B AS, and the smallest, is 3B AS. Then the 20B looses say 15% if current (so 10% would loose 1.5%), and 3B AS gets a 30% boost (10% becomes 13%)

Sarevok wrote:Is it possible to scale the value based on the size of people in the house?

Like say the largest is 20B AS, and the smallest, is 3B AS. Then the 20B looses say 15% if current (so 10% would loose 1.5%), and 3B AS gets a 30% boost (10% becomes 13%)

That's a bad idea that has the potential to be abused something cronic

Hows that? Get heaps of people to join a house, to reduce your enemies bonus? But wait, don't all those people in the house ALSO get the lowered bonus? And won't that only happen once they reach the 5 days time period, so it's reduced for a day, till their all kicked, and they have to rejoin.

Earendil wrote:So, because an alliance chooses NOT to join a house, they should be able to receive a bonus of at least twice as much as a regular house bonus? That's just asinine.

well then you stop being asinine and post something that would be fair bonus, cause me being honest i dont have a damn clue what the houses get,
I havent been in a house, Im a lone wolf, so im basing my post on that,, and seeing as we get a 10% defense and covert, i was suggesting they only get the bonus on one of them not both, which would be half ,

and i dont see how you think that bonus is so much better then what i have heard some houses get, isnt here a house that gives you ascended bonus all the time, talk about an unfair advantage, note I am not saying I know jack crapt about house's Just that I dont see not a thing for an alliance not wanting to be in a house,, so as i said quit being a butt head and post something to help instead of your constant post of disagree

I think disagree-ing is as helpfull as agree-ing and I think matt only half disagrees (that being the size of the bonus not the idea of lone wolf alliance bonus)

well then he should post a suitable bonus ,, instead of sound as if he dont want them to have anything,, then Maybe I wouldnt thing he was such a butt

odji nsu wrote:

Earendil wrote:So, because an alliance chooses NOT to join a house, they should be able to receive a bonus of at least twice as much as a regular house bonus? That's just asinine.

well then you stop being asinine and post something that would be fair bonus, cause me being honest i dont have a damn clue what the houses get,
I havent been in a house, Im a lone wolf, so im basing my post on that,, and seeing as we get a 10% defense and covert, i was suggesting they only get the bonus on one of them not both, which would be half ,

and i dont see how you think that bonus is so much better then what i have heard some houses get, isnt here a house that gives you ascended bonus all the time, talk about an unfair advantage, note I am not saying I know jack crapt about house's Just that I dont see not a thing for an alliance not wanting to be in a house,, so as i said quit being a butt head and post something to help instead of your constant post of disagree

Why should alliances not wanting to participate in the houses get a bonus? A kid wants to ride the ferris wheel he goes to the carnival and if he doesn't want to go to the carnival he doesn't ride, simple. I find it amusing that you tell eary he's a butt when you admit your talking out of yours... read up on the houses before suggesting a change. That way you can give a solid well thought out idea instead of a knee-jerk opinion.

IF and I stress the if part, there is a non-house bonus for alliances you can be certain it won't be more than half of any current house bonus. It won't be based off of the lone wolf bonus.

BTW what happened to this:

odji nsu wrote:Oh well i tried to help the alliances that want to stand alone, hopefully someone more liked then me will come give it a try, Im out of this, going back to not given a rats ass, It's not worth auguring with the likes of you 2 losers

WHY should they Not have one, Cause you think they shouldnt?
It is funny how you all say what will happen, damn i thought jason made those choices. I never said I was talking Out MY BUTT I said I didnt Know what the HOUSE BONUS WAS,, Nor DO I Care. My Goal Is to get Non House Alliance's there Fair Cut in these updates,

I do see im getting some attention From you all that oppose lone alliance bonus,, Am I stepping on your plan,

As for your carnival comparison the kid that dont want to go to ride the ferris wheel can style walk around and enjoy the cotton candy , Or do you think he should have to ride the rides in order to enjoy the carnival,


And on your last note, I change My mind, Its My right as human being to do so, or should I confirm to what you say. LMAO

not today
beware gifts!!

Wepwaet wrote:Is it possible to move the "alliance gift" drop down box so that it doesn't drop down over the house relations buttons? A bit too easy to misclick currently...

When you get around to adding the 3ic and 4ic position in the alliances, can you make it that the 3ic and 4ic cannot disband the alliance, that should be solely the 1iC and 2iC.

only 3ic and 4ic can disband alliance - got it

GeneralChaos wrote:When you get around to adding the 3ic and 4ic position in the alliances, can you make it that the 3ic and 4ic cannot disband the alliance, that should be solely the 1iC and 2iC.

hey while your here lol please can we get something for loan alliance, hell a spit in the bucket will be better then nothing,,
thank you

find the right bonus. that benefits small alliance, but it not --on its own outside of small alliance -- such a benefit...
a spit in the bucket --or face -- will not work, because EVERYBODY WANTS THAT!!!

odji nsu wrote:hey while your here lol please can we get something for loan alliance, hell a spit in the bucket will be better then nothing,,
thank you

lol,, yeah its hard to get a spit in the bucket, lol Robe has some good ideas

and any bonus would help them out, maybe just a small covert bonus since the games leaning that way, so they can compete with these covert levels of 34 to 36 that all the big empires sport these days.

I wish I had the right percentage to put with it, but to be honest I dont know the proper numbers to suggest,, with out it being to big. or sound like im trying to make them more appealing, I just want them something

So forum have you though about lowering the sab increase to 1.5 or 1.3?