Page 276 of 346

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:52 pm
by BMMJ13
Rudy Pena wrote:As you can see, it did not even get below 50tril.

Rudy Pena wrote:lol Nice try, But when I logged in, I had 62mil def weapons left.

06:11 Mathlord 5,348,520,650 Naquadah stolen 15 959,822 8,643,463 23,273,382,661,800 133,169,683,681,000 details
06:11 Mathlord 569,358,649,799 Naquadah stolen 15 1,987,386 8,841,386 24,084,483,342,000 67,267,375,122,345 details
06:11 Mathlord 2,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 1,149,356 9,044,085 25,925,431,022,000 125,970,094,688,000 details

I didnt know that 528K weapons could make a over 20tril def.... :-" :-" :-" :shock:

Thanks for making it easy, as I said it was a guess. So you only lost 290 mil of your 350 mil weapons. Story changed pretty fast in a few minutes didn't it? Pretty sure 24 tril is below 50 tril.

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:55 pm
by Huxley
BMMJ13 wrote:Considering how many sabs he got in, must of been a two way war setting. I wonder how many weapons he lost, let's consult my calculator (that omega like so much) and see if it can make a guess.

Sab 1: You Lost 5 Spies
Enemy Lost 21,901,565 of: 5750/5750 Defense Weapons
Weapons Remaining:
15,000,000 of: 5760/5760 Attack Weapons
328,098,435 of: 5750/5750 Defense Weapons

Sab 51: You Lost 5 Spies
Enemy Lost 992,814 of: 5750/5750 Defense Weapons
Weapons Remaining:
15,000,000 of: 5760/5760 Attack Weapons
528,006 of: 5750/5750 Defense Weapons


Common Sense FAIL.

Like your going to be able to sab 350mil wepaons down to 500k with 15mil attack weapons there.

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:56 pm
by Rudy Peña
BMMJ13 wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:As you can see, it did not even get below 50tril.

Rudy Pena wrote:lol Nice try, But when I logged in, I had 62mil def weapons left.

06:11 Mathlord 5,348,520,650 Naquadah stolen 15 959,822 8,643,463 23,273,382,661,800 133,169,683,681,000 details
06:11 Mathlord 569,358,649,799 Naquadah stolen 15 1,987,386 8,841,386 24,084,483,342,000 67,267,375,122,345 details
06:11 Mathlord 2,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 1,149,356 9,044,085 25,925,431,022,000 125,970,094,688,000 details

I didnt know that 528K weapons could make a over 20tril def.... :-" :-" :-" :shock:

Thanks for making it easy, as I said it was a guess. So you only lost 290 mil of your 350 mil weapons. Story changed pretty fast in a few minutes didn't it? Pretty sure 24 tril is below 50 tril.

Pretty sure my def wasnt massed to 20tril......

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:08 pm
by IFLuX
Rudy Pena wrote:Pretty sure my def wasnt massed to 20tril......

It was not massed but it was sabbed ... u lost the defence wepons :D

And your defence was 24 T with my last sab :smt081

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:08 pm
by BMMJ13
Huxley wrote:Common Sense FAIL.

Like your going to be able to sab 350mil wepaons down to 500k with 15mil attack weapons there.


Math Lesson:

With war setting:
0.94^51 = 0.042610883
350+15 = 365 * 0.042610883 = 15.5529723 - 15 = 552,972 Defense Weapons
That means after 51 sabs with a war/war setting, you would have 15.55 mil Weapons left, 552k of them being defense.

Without war setting it would be:
0.97^51 = 0.211523414
365 * 0.211523414 = 77.2060461 - 15 = 62.2 Mil Defense Weapons

If he got in that many sabs without war/war, then there must be a bug/update allowing that many sabs. If he only killed that many weapons with war/war, then it is also a bug. Perhaps you should report it to admin. ;)

Rudy Pena wrote:Pretty sure my def wasnt massed to 20tril......

Doesn't matter how it got there, your defense was that low. Perhaps next time don't untrain your spies while on ppt and forget the ppt end. ;)

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:32 pm
by Belsamber
Hectic loses all round and what cheap sabs

:-"

Good to see all are having fun

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:02 pm
by doc holliday
rudy is going to have a long weekend :-D

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:03 pm
by Rudy Peña
So is TAF with the losses being taken trying to mass me.

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:10 pm
by doc holliday
Rudy Pena wrote:So is TAF with the losses being taken trying to mass me.


yes mr. broken record. we all know it takes more uu to mass than to defend usually. thats why you are defending these days. also i think losses are more in our favor in the last 24 hrs with your little sab sab dilemma from this morning :smt047

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:12 pm
by Rudy Peña
doc holliday wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:So is TAF with the losses being taken trying to mass me.


yes mr. broken record. we all know it takes more uu to mass than to defend usually. thats why you are defending these days. also i think losses are more in our favor in the last 24 hrs with your little sab sab dilemma from this morning :smt047

Nope, not in your favor. Nearly 200mil uu attack supers killed by my def, while only losing less than 100mil uu.

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:15 pm
by stratigize
I heard OE had some fight left in them so i came back from a temporarily leave.... Rudy got my first strike since ive been back.... First round... Sadly goes to him. The Temp PPT saved him as well as a repair. But its ok I always have fight in me.


Good luck OE

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:15 pm
by doc holliday
Rudy Pena wrote:
doc holliday wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:So is TAF with the losses being taken trying to mass me.


yes mr. broken record. we all know it takes more uu to mass than to defend usually. thats why you are defending these days. also i think losses are more in our favor in the last 24 hrs with your little sab sab dilemma from this morning :smt047

Nope, not in your favor. Nearly 200mil uu attack supers killed by my def, while only losing less than 100mil uu.


sigh.
250 mill weps sabbed = 150Trill naq
that 100 mill uu difference from massing= 60 trill naq.

as i said. the losses are more in our favor our the last 24 hrs :smt036

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:18 pm
by Rudy Peña
doc holliday wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
doc holliday wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:So is TAF with the losses being taken trying to mass me.


yes mr. broken record. we all know it takes more uu to mass than to defend usually. thats why you are defending these days. also i think losses are more in our favor in the last 24 hrs with your little sab sab dilemma from this morning :smt047

Nope, not in your favor. Nearly 200mil uu attack supers killed by my def, while only losing less than 100mil uu.


sigh.
250 mill weps sabbed = 150Trill naq
that 100 mill uu difference from massing= 60 trill naq.

as i said. the losses are more in our favor our the last 24 hrs :smt036
Actually it was more like 247.9mil weapons. 8-[ [-(

Its still costing you guys, repair naq. :P dont forget math massed his ms on me also. ;)

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:23 pm
by stratigize
Rudy Pena wrote:
doc holliday wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
doc holliday wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:So is TAF with the losses being taken trying to mass me.


yes mr. broken record. we all know it takes more uu to mass than to defend usually. thats why you are defending these days. also i think losses are more in our favor in the last 24 hrs with your little sab sab dilemma from this morning :smt047

Nope, not in your favor. Nearly 200mil uu attack supers killed by my def, while only losing less than 100mil uu.


sigh.
250 mill weps sabbed = 150Trill naq
that 100 mill uu difference from massing= 60 trill naq.

as i said. the losses are more in our favor our the last 24 hrs :smt036
Actually it was more like 247.9mil weapons. 8-[ [-(

Its still costing you guys, repair naq. :P dont forget math massed his ms on me also. ;)



I think your MS was massed compared to mine :)

Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:28 pm
by Rudy Peña
you are not math. ;)