Page 277 of 346
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:01 pm
by Huxley
BMMJ13 wrote:Huxley wrote:Common Sense FAIL.
Like your going to be able to sab 350mil wepaons down to 500k with 15mil attack weapons there.
Math Lesson:
With war setting:
0.94^51 = 0.042610883
350+15 = 365 * 0.042610883 = 15.5529723 - 15 = 552,972 Defense Weapons
That means after 51 sabs with a war/war setting, you would have 15.55 mil Weapons left, 552k of them being defense.
Without war setting it would be:
0.97^51 = 0.211523414
365 * 0.211523414 = 77.2060461 - 15 = 62.2 Mil Defense Weapons
If he got in that many sabs without war/war, then there must be a bug/update allowing that many sabs. If he only killed that many weapons with war/war, then it is also a bug. Perhaps you should report it to admin.
Rudy Pena wrote:Pretty sure my def wasnt massed to 20tril......
Doesn't matter how it got there, your defense was that low. Perhaps next time don't untrain your spies while on ppt and forget the ppt end.
I'm awaiting your PM reply, I know you've read it!
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:05 pm
by sarparto
Come on, guys/gals! We're not here to talk nonsense to Bob Loblaw
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:57 pm
by BMMJ13
Huxley wrote:BMMJ13 wrote:Huxley wrote:Common Sense FAIL.
Like your going to be able to sab 350mil wepaons down to 500k with 15mil attack weapons there.
Math Lesson:
With war setting:
0.94^51 = 0.042610883
350+15 = 365 * 0.042610883 = 15.5529723 - 15 = 552,972 Defense Weapons
That means after 51 sabs with a war/war setting, you would have 15.55 mil Weapons left, 552k of them being defense.
Without war setting it would be:
0.97^51 = 0.211523414
365 * 0.211523414 = 77.2060461 - 15 = 62.2 Mil Defense Weapons
If he got in that many sabs without war/war, then there must be a bug/update allowing that many sabs. If he only killed that many weapons with war/war, then it is also a bug. Perhaps you should report it to admin.
Rudy Pena wrote:Pretty sure my def wasnt massed to 20tril......
Doesn't matter how it got there, your defense was that low. Perhaps next time don't untrain your spies while on ppt and forget the ppt end.
I'm awaiting your PM reply, I know you've read it!
Not going to respond to it.
Huxley wrote:Perhaps I should pay him instead lmao!
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:07 pm
by Huxley
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:40 pm
by Mathlord
My mothership cost me about a tril to fix?
The uu you lose massing is outweighed by weapons killed once the massing is complete. I had to leave at 3 this afternoon to take my friend to physical therapy, so I figured the least I could do was make you waste a PPT before I left
Or at the very least have a go at it and break the stalemate
This afternoon was the first volley, the calm before the storm...to see how you'd react as we prod what you have over and over and over again. We'll see how you are once you are out of PPTs to protect you...
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:00 pm
by stratigize
I Hope OE didnt miss me too much.... One defense down and as far as i can see 3 to go.... Enough work for one night. Ill be back after my drunken weekend
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:09 pm
by GrizzZzzly
as the saying goes, drink, drive, stay alive.... no wait
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:16 pm
by prsko
With 126,725,049,832,301 power remaining, they manage to eliminate 7078886 of General Zeus's Undercover Agents!
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:38 pm
by Lord Yojimbo
Gots myself a couple of defences two days back - i should be back around for a couple more once the weekend is over....apologies for not being more active folks - RL is kinda busy
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:06 pm
by doc holliday
prsko wrote:With 126,725,049,832,301 power remaining, they manage to eliminate 7078886 of General Zeus's Undercover Agents!
Dang't! I was ready to ac the first round but had to opt after that.
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:57 pm
by Mr Nice Guy
Kikaz started it...
Huxley continued it...
McDeadly finished it...
One trillion to the one who guess it correctly what it is and how long it took! The ones mentione above cant participate!
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:37 pm
by Chacho
Mr Nice Guy wrote::-"
Kikaz started it...
Huxley continued it...
McDeadly finished it...
One trillion to the one who guess it correctly what it is and how long it took! The ones mentione above cant participate!
Was iiit...
A book with real words and not just pictures???
And for those 3... i reckon it took a year or so
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:49 pm
by Mr Nice Guy
No Chacho!
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:50 pm
by Kikaz
I didn't start anything that needed to be finished.
I took maths defense from 60t to 25t twice in an hour, I failed massing both times either to alliance repair, math repair, sabbs, super losses or PPT.
He raided to raid cap after each attempt and fully repaired...
Even though I could have gone a 3rd or 4th time, math didn't come off PPT before I had to leave for most of 2 days.
You could have said I failed, huxely failed and Mcdeadly succeeded, probably would be more accurate.
But to say I started it, huxely continued and mcdeadly finished is kind of retarded considering they were days apart and damage had been fully repaired if not raised after each attempt..
Re: Happy Birthday ETL! - TAF vs. OE
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:11 pm
by Mr Nice Guy
Kikaz wrote:I didn't start anything that needed to be finished.
I took maths defense from 60t to 25t twice in an hour, I failed massing both times either to alliance repair, math repair, sabbs, super losses or PPT.
He raided to raid cap after each attempt and fully repaired...
Even though I could have gone a 3rd or 4th time, math didn't come off PPT before I had to leave for most of 2 days.
You could have said I failed, huxely failed and Mcdeadly succeeded, probably would be more accurate.
But to say I started it, huxely continued and mcdeadly finished is kind of retarded considering they were days apart and damage had been fully repaired if not raised after each attempt..
Ermmm Kikaz, im sorry but im not talking about Mathlord at all...
Im talking about the def you started taking down, Huxley almost finished killing and today McDeadly after huxley he finished it...
And third massing of the day from the kittie today who stoped somehow, not going to ask why hahahaha but he did stop... errmmm again dude... chill pills
