Page 29 of 104
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:15 am
by LegendaryA
Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:I fail to understand what's the point in supporting boring teams when it's not your national team...
Boring teams?
Well obviously I support England as it's my National team.... I supported Switzerland because i don't believe in Countries winning World Cup or Euros twice in a row... that's just greedy.
But I also support Ghana in their group. You may think Ghana is a boring team, but I support them because I met two Ghanaian's at work and they were the most friendly people i have ever met, so for the reason they have my full support. Plus they could end up against England if they come runner up.
Did I say either England or Ghana are boring? Nope...
I infact cheered for Ghana when they played Serbia..
I support Spain because I like the nation and its team.
It's the second country I know the most, due to having spent most of my childhood summer holidays there.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:21 am
by Clarkey
Leg Apophis wrote:Did I say either England or Ghana are boring? Nope...
I infact cheered for Ghana when they played Serbia..
I support Spain because I like the nation and its team.
It's the second country I know the most, due to having spent most of my childhood summer holidays there.
I said England because that's my national team, I didn't say you implied they were boring.
But you made the comment that you don't understand why people support boring teams when they aren't their national team. I gave Ghana as an example because many may consider them a boring team, but I stated why I support them.
You must seem to think Switzerland is a boring team..... well I'm pretty sure that Spain didn't think they were boring when they were playing.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:24 am
by Thriller
next game is going to be a tie...
Common tie!!!
lol soccer isn't as much fun to bet on as NA football
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:27 am
by moses
Thriller wrote:next game is going to be a tie...
Common tie!!!
lol soccer isn't as much fun to bet on as NA football
thats couse NA football is even more un predictable and a 37-14 score can be erased in 30 seconds lol
now 1-0 thats what i can a game
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:32 am
by LegendaryA
Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Did I say either England or Ghana are boring? Nope...
I infact cheered for Ghana when they played Serbia..
I support Spain because I like the nation and its team.
It's the second country I know the most, due to having spent most of my childhood summer holidays there.
I said England because that's my national team, I didn't say you implied they were boring.
But you made the comment that you don't understand why people support boring teams when they aren't their national team. I gave Ghana as an example because
many may consider them a boring team, but I stated why I support them.
You must seem to think Switzerland is a boring team..... well I'm pretty sure that Spain didn't think they were boring when they were playing.
Subsaharian teams are rarely boring.
Anyway, I blame this defeat on not choosing Fabregas (seriously, what the hell??) and bringing Torrès too late. Cannot blame the referee at all, he was mostly doing it right...
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:36 am
by Clarkey
Leg Apophis wrote:Subsaharian teams are rarely boring.
Anyway, I blame this defeat on not choosing Fabregas (seriously, what the hell??) and bringing Torrès too late. Cannot blame the referee at all, he was mostly doing it right...
You just think Switzerland are boring because they beat Spain.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:38 am
by LegendaryA
Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Subsaharian teams are rarely boring.
Anyway, I blame this defeat on not choosing Fabregas (seriously, what the hell??) and bringing Torrès too late. Cannot blame the referee at all, he was mostly doing it right...
You just think Switzerland are boring because they beat Spain.
No, I was thinking that long before.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:39 am
by Thriller
LOl
GO Swiss GO...
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:44 am
by Clarkey
Leg Apophis wrote:Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Subsaharian teams are rarely boring.
Anyway, I blame this defeat on not choosing Fabregas (seriously, what the hell??) and bringing Torrès too late. Cannot blame the referee at all, he was mostly doing it right...
You just think Switzerland are boring because they beat Spain.
No, I was thinking that long before.
Of course you were.
I'm sure that you will also think Chile and Honduras are boring too.
lol some people are just sore losers.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:46 am
by moses
Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Subsaharian teams are rarely boring.
Anyway, I blame this defeat on not choosing Fabregas (seriously, what the hell??) and bringing Torrès too late. Cannot blame the referee at all, he was mostly doing it right...
You just think Switzerland are boring because they beat Spain.
No, I was thinking that long before.
Of course you were.
I'm sure that you will also think Chile and Honduras are boring too.
lol some people are just sore losers.
Just like the whole spanish team what a disgrace to football
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:48 am
by LegendaryA
Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Subsaharian teams are rarely boring.
Anyway, I blame this defeat on not choosing Fabregas (seriously, what the hell??) and bringing Torrès too late. Cannot blame the referee at all, he was mostly doing it right...
You just think Switzerland are boring because they beat Spain.
No, I was thinking that long before.
Of course you were.
I'm sure that you will also think Chile and Honduras are boring too.
lol some people are just sore losers.
You have obviously no idea what you are talking about, so I will suggest you to shut up for your own sake!
[spoiler]
Leg Apophis wrote:Honduras - Chile
Dynamic match, Chile just scored. However, Honduras is also providing game if we consider difference between Chile and Honduras.
[/spoiler]
moses of romania wrote:Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Subsaharian teams are rarely boring.
Anyway, I blame this defeat on not choosing Fabregas (seriously, what the hell??) and bringing Torrès too late. Cannot blame the referee at all, he was mostly doing it right...
You just think Switzerland are boring because they beat Spain.
No, I was thinking that long before.
Of course you were.
I'm sure that you will also think Chile and Honduras are boring too.
lol some people are just sore losers.
Just like the whole spanish team what a disgrace to football
Your nation isn't even in world cup so
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:50 am
by Clarkey
Leg Apophis wrote:Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Subsaharian teams are rarely boring.
Anyway, I blame this defeat on not choosing Fabregas (seriously, what the hell??) and bringing Torrès too late. Cannot blame the referee at all, he was mostly doing it right...
You just think Switzerland are boring because they beat Spain.
No, I was thinking that long before.
Of course you were.
I'm sure that you will also think Chile and Honduras are boring too.
lol some people are just sore losers.
You have obviously no idea what you are talking about, so I will suggest you to shut up for your own sake!
lol you really are a sore loser.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:51 am
by LegendaryA
Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Clarkey wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:Subsaharian teams are rarely boring.
Anyway, I blame this defeat on not choosing Fabregas (seriously, what the hell??) and bringing Torrès too late. Cannot blame the referee at all, he was mostly doing it right...
You just think Switzerland are boring because they beat Spain.
No, I was thinking that long before.
Of course you were.
I'm sure that you will also think Chile and Honduras are boring too.
lol some people are just sore losers.
You have obviously no idea what you are talking about, so I will suggest you to shut up for your own sake!
lol you really are a sore loser.
One word: Green.
Leg Apophis wrote:Honduras - Chile
Dynamic match, Chile just scored. However, Honduras is also providing game if we consider difference between Chile and Honduras.
Yes, indeed, I said they were boring teams.
I didn't know Clarkey knew more my opinion about teams than myself, but apparently, he pretends to...rather funny if you ask me.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:00 am
by Thriller
We play hockey here pops,
IN that game its frowned upon to roll around on the ground in extreme agony when you stub your pinkey toe.
.... You really can be a real bigot sometimes
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:02 am
by LegendaryA
Thriller wrote:We play hockey here pops,
IN that game its frowned upon to roll around on the ground in extreme agaony when you stub your pinkey toe.
.... You really can be a real bigot sometimes
Now that made absolutely
no sense, at all.
---
There's absolutely no logic into accusing the opposite team of being boring to find an excuse for a defeat. You know, usually, it's cheating from other team, bad referee, etc...
But well, I guess I have to learn to this rather ignorant audience how people who cannot take a defeat react.
Want to know why I find Swiss boring? They didn't score anything last world cup, and lost two of their matches in Euro 2008 despite being hosts and ended last of their group.
Now, that's a
slighty more realistic reason than the one you assumed, don't you think?