Page 29 of 55

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 5:19 am
by Norbe
dgb wrote:When i look at beli and thors kill stats i feel like im floging a dead horse tbh lol.


That's why i dont post mine! To make you feel better!

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 5:23 am
by Bullseye
Yeah those 2 have indeed been the most devastating for both sides. Good show by both.

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 8:09 am
by meatman
Jorgensen wrote:This start to look more and more like TAF aganinst OE..


Your doing. :-"


I'm inexperienced with this whole "war" aspect of gatewars, it's about time I get some practice, why not against one of the best warring alliances in the game? Once I'm out of LG I'm all yours (2 days to go ;) )

Be gentle...

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 8:34 am
by Mathlord
All you fancy people and your big numbers...

Attack Mercs Killed (30) 57,482,843
Defence Mercs Killed (10) 51,148,299
Attack Soldiers Killed(60) 23,003
Defence Soldiers Killed(20) 14,020,279
Attack Super Soldiers Killed(300) 26,175,963
Defence Super Soldiers Killed(100) 123,417,083
Spies Killed(50) 113,920,579
Spy Killers Killed(50) 3,246,789

Weapon Points Destroyed (Sab+Att)(0.0001) 2,982,817,652,013



Super Soldier Lost 123,787,110
Super Guards Lost 11,926,764
Covert Ops Lost 11,214,917
CounterIntelligence Agents Lost 3,203,860

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 8:46 am
by dgb
ha i spit on your stats beli take a look :)

Defence Soldiers Killed(20) 6,731,401
Attack Super Soldiers Killed(300) 6,005,910
Defence Super Soldiers Killed(100) 6,232,707
Mothership Weapons Destroyed(300) 956,654
Mothership Shields Destroyed(300) 877,119
Mothership Fleets Destroyed(200) 39,109
Planet Defences Destroyed(300) 6,576

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 11:35 am
by Tekki
I see BAU is eager to join the war. DMing me isn't such a good idea. Despite the increase I get in CER, I do take that thing personal especially without declaration.

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 12:00 pm
by Nikola Tesla
Tekki wrote:I see BAU is eager to join the war. DMing me isn't such a good idea. Despite the increase I get in CER, I do take that thing personal especially without declaration.

erm.. jorg massed BAU earlier so... eager to join?


:smt050

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 12:04 pm
by Mathlord
Tekki wrote:I see BAU is eager to join the war. DMing me isn't such a good idea. Despite the increase I get in CER, I do take that thing personal especially without declaration.


BAU didn't exactly have a choice in the matter :lol:

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 12:09 pm
by Tekki
Nice try Vahko, but when aggression meets aggression then the conclusion is obvious, BAU want to be involved. :)

Given the timing of the attack, I know who ordered it and I know he hoped to remain hidden by attacking only with a stealth method. Pity for him that doesn't always work :D

Mathlord wrote:
Tekki wrote:I see BAU is eager to join the war. DMing me isn't such a good idea. Despite the increase I get in CER, I do take that thing personal especially without declaration.


BAU didn't exactly have a choice in the matter :lol:

BAU had plenty of choice, they could have attempted diplomacy. They have not. Or rather, TAF have not.

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 12:12 pm
by Mathlord
We could have attempted diplomacy after Delta and Pi massed TA then Jorgensen decided to go after BAU?

Whatever makes you sleep at night Tekki as always :)

As for who ordered your dm'ing. That was me. I spied all of Pi and picked targets for people to hit. You were one of quite a few selected this afternoon. I got me a nice 90 quad defense :D

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 12:16 pm
by Nikola Tesla
Tekki wrote:Nice try Vahko, but when aggression meets aggression then the conclusion is obvious, BAU want to be involved. :)

Given the timing of the attack, I know who ordered it and I know he hoped to remain hidden by attacking only with a stealth method. Pity for him that doesn't always work :D

Mathlord wrote:
Tekki wrote:I see BAU is eager to join the war. DMing me isn't such a good idea. Despite the increase I get in CER, I do take that thing personal especially without declaration.


BAU didn't exactly have a choice in the matter :lol:

BAU had plenty of choice, they could have attempted diplomacy. They have not. Or rather, TAF have not.



Nice Try? only reason BAU was not zeroed was because there was a tag holder online that ppted alliance. or are you telling me jorg was massing for other reason that was not connected with this war? war is war. so lets' have fun.. i already lost 20mil uu and its been less then an hour i'm of ppt.

p.s. my name is vakho. not vahko. can you please not misspell it in the future. thank you.

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 12:16 pm
by Tekki
And I'm sure the person you DM'd will be as happy as I am about the CER increase :)

Though Mathlord, you prove to me, yet again, that TAF have little imagination. You always chose the path of escalation when there are other options. TAF are still so young in that regard.

However, the fact you had to use BAU tells me that you are hurting in ascension, given that you could have picked anyone from TAAE or TATS to help without expansion but did not. Thanks for the confirmation :) I guess I'll get the descension crews working a bit harder to see if we can't get everyone.

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 12:28 pm
by Chacho
I would like to thank Silverburn for the naquadah he was too slow to spend... please look below for more details...

[spoiler]13:11 Silverburn 0 Naquadah stolen 15 68,402 0 118,741,035,735 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 288,782,574,801 Naquadah stolen 15 70,156 0 123,115,705,472 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 71,954 0 138,753,413,804 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 77,633 0 159,015,773,001 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 75,692 0 299,421,839,818 5 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 73,799 0 133,739,903,407 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 79,623 0 155,682,691,296 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 83,759 0 315,948,369,937 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 81,665 0 172,112,006,533 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 90,368 0 364,347,493,860 5 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 88,109 0 168,015,093,604 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 85,906 0 344,862,853,727 5 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 97,500 0 357,473,012,843 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 95,062 0 182,111,251,647 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 92,685 0 182,534,830,781 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 100,000 0 204,790,095,081 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 193,568,720,009 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 208,317,606,552 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 421,301,527,490 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 214,483,807,706 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 228,066,115,653 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 447,771,751,363 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 470,214,501,509 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 223,983,090,564 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 241,648,423,600 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 226,850,929,615 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 233,524,036,944 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 260,397,008,190 6 details
13:11 Silverburn 1,000,000,000,000 Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 480,408,176,390 5 details[/spoiler]

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 12:30 pm
by Kjarkur
Kick their ass Delta ! ! :sge

but try to enjoy it TAF enjoy the game

Re: TÅÅE and TÅTS vs Δ and Π Allegiances

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 12:31 pm
by Mathlord
Good pr Tekki, your spin job has always been magical. You say we have little imagination. I say that unlike many alliances out there, we don't back down that easily. We consider massing an act of war. Just like your friends in OE will mass people for attacking their alliances for naq, we mass people for massing our alliances. It's not a difficult concept.

We told our members in TA and BAU when this war started to cease attacks on OE, despite OE still attacking them because we wanted any escalation to be YOUR doing, not ours. We kept our promise and when TA started to get massed, it was a decision by Delta and Pi to do so. Likewise, whether it was Jorgensen alone or Delta as a whole who decided to go after BAU, it was not something of our doing, it was OE's decision to expand it. I refuse to tell them not to strike back.

Now do we always choose escalation? Of course not and you know this. We kept things civil for months and months through OE farming and raiding. When Jander started stealing planets, we delt with them via a vendetta instead of all out war. All of these steps WE took are far and beyond the good graces I've seen OE grant us over that same period.

It's always the same talk with you. If we want peace, we have to accept not touching your accounts while you guys mess with ours. Well we refuse to do that. You are welcome to continue spinning that fact all you want but in the end you can't deny that your alternatives lead to TAF getting massed whenever OE pleases to do so as it always has been.

Now for the most part the people in this war have had civil dealings and instead of playing politics about who starts what, we've focused on the fun in the field. I'd recommend to you to keep it that way as all this "outrage" at us for daring to mass you makes you look more than a bit silly.