StarGateWars Forums

Phoenix of Terra wrote:Then you missed the official interpretation of it.

Where both "average" and "neither good nor bad" both mean "bad".

I never said they mean "bad". I just said it's bad for the moderators to get anything other than very good.
Spacey you missed the fact that the first 20 very good votes are ignored as the mods will vote that for themselves.

Ero`Sore wrote:Spacey you missed the fact that the first 20 very good votes are ignored as the mods will vote that for themselves.

Then the flaw is with the poll, you cannot say for sure they were mods instead of users.

You should have said to post the vote, like what Psi did.

Lol, 6-10-11-1-6 atm. Very goods and bads have balances out with the removed 20 posts. lmao

Eros you are missing the part were we are ignoring those 20 gone posts.

You are missing the point were we are counting everything but good as bad.

You are missing the point were we don't have issues miss interpreting what people say.

You are missing the point were we don't care what you say now.

-Goodie

Phoenix of Terra wrote:Lol, 6-10-11-1-6 atm. Very goods and bads have balances out with the removed 20 posts. lmao

As I said, the 20 mods will vote very good, and the 20 mods are very active.
The 20 mods each have another account called *global or whatever moderator 1-5 or something*, therefore they will actually have atleast 40 votes, that is if they don't make anymore accounts as there is no way for us to check.

Even 20 isn't enough, but I figure the community will outnumber the multies that are the mods.

Ero`Sore wrote:Even 20 isn't enough, but I figure the community will outnumber the multies that are the mods.

What you are saying is that even it it gets to 100 people saying mods did good... they are multis of mods and mods who voted?

Not all of them. I do believe some ill informed people believe that the mods are doing good. But I am sure some of those 100 would be from multi mods.

I was seriously tempted to call myself a mod multi for a second, but then I realized some people might actually believe me.

Phoenix of Terra wrote:I was seriously tempted to call myself a mod multi for a second, but then I realized some people might actually believe me.

Probably just the one...

smooshable wrote:

Phoenix of Terra wrote:I was seriously tempted to call myself a mod multi for a second, but then I realized some people might actually believe me.

Probably just the one...

It sounds politer not to single someone out.

Who could it have been?

Perhaps its just me but on a community run forum were all the mods get from spending their free time doing this is a colored name in main which in my opinion isn't much. I would say with these standards anything that isn't purely bad should be considered a vote for the mods. Only if someone gets paid for this could you consider it bad for them not to get very goods.

Ero`Sore wrote:Who could it have been?

Are you now claiming you don't have any supporters who will believe anything about the mods that is negative?

Saber wrote:Perhaps its just me but on a community run forum were all the mods get from spending their free time doing this is a colored name in main which in my opinion isn't much. I would say with these standards anything that isn't purely bad should be considered a vote for the mods. Only if someone gets paid for this could you consider it bad for them not to get very goods.

Oh but they are trying. They have asked for extra PPTs, extra MTs, new ID#s, bonuses, an option to call themselves whatever they want ingame, they have asked to be immune to ingame attacks, they have asked for much. They have even recieved the custom titled.