Severian wrote:The flip side to every coin.
Severian wrote:But wait, we haven't even gotten up to the op massings yet. On forums, people complain about users massing mods for doing their jobs. Yet on irc, a user makes a mistake and have gotten massed time and time again by - you guessed it, the ops. It has become embedded in the culture of irc that "n00bs" or people with the wrong attitude/breaking rules are massed and most of the massings have occured from a select few ops. Most of the time with enourmous size differences.
Completely unethical of course.
<JOS> you'll be glad to hear, Tim has left
<LordBalor>

<LordBalor> Its like christmas all over again!
<JOS> i know
<Silence> lmao
<Odin> lol
<Odin> christmas , estern and birthday on the same day
*** IIxFOXYxII has joined #stargatewars
<Silence> whats wrong with tim again?
<JOS> spammer
<JOS> immature
<JOS> bogan
<Odin> he is a pain in the neck
<JOS> etx
<Silence> ahok
<JOS> etc*
<Silence> fair enough
<Silence> thoughta massing him?
<JOS> he wont give us his ingame

<LordBalor> No one knows his ingame nick
<Silence> ahok
<Odin> thats the problem
* JOS slaps his forehead
<LordBalor> I know we'll all be willing to put in 5 bill for it
Hmm.
---
You used to get on fine with everyone in the channel and now suddenly you're trying to come across as some sort of perpetually oppressed chat user standing up for the rights of the underprivileged, when in fact they may or may not be idiots but clearly have not bothered themselves with so much as skim reading the rules.
IRC Rules wrote:We live in a free society; opinions are therefore free to have. However, if you feel they are insulting or offensive please talk to the channel and/or network staff.
You see, you will find that, being a chat room, people are allowed to voice their opinions. Freedom of speech I guess. Ops are not excluded from this by virtue of their position. They are allowed to have opinions as well. They can voice them regarding TLE should they choose, just as someone like Nuto would come in and rave about Omega in years gone by. These people were not censored or prevented from doing so, despite ops even being occasionally part of the alliances in question.
Did you have any issues with 'slurs' on Omega or other alliances for that matter?
Or is it only unacceptable because an op is doing it?
That would be double standards but certainly not in the way you describe.
---
Severian wrote:12 ops/mods posts have occured since I first posted the blatent abuse and all 12 have utterly ignored it in the hope it'll just fade away and be forgotten. It has not even been publically acknowledged, let alone countered.
Well let's give that a crack then shall we.
---
Severian wrote:1) [That modded is the F-bomb btw so leading by example on no swearing]
Fine. You have an example of homer swearing. You talk in your next point about how TLE was 'provoked' into swearing and how awful it was that they were kicked for doing so. This looks to me like a statement made when homer is well and truly provoked. So the question becomes; Is it ok to swear if you are provoked or not?
Make up your mind and let us know. Ta.
And yes I know there were a few older examples of him swearing presented. Those are from a time where the rules seemed to be swear, get an automatic kick from a bot and automatically rejoin the channel. Forgive Homer for not administering this punishment to himself.
---
Severian wrote:2) So much for Not offending people and for leaving politics behind.
Provoking people and then kick/banning them when they get angry and post something in the moment.
I've already talked about how everyone is entitled to their opinion. Certainly stating something like "TLE are just bullies / people who think they can do nehting" is not kick worthy and never has been. There has been an eternity of far worse remarks made about Omega in particular that never caused an issue. It is not an abuse of power for an op to express his opinion in the same way as a regular user.
If the TLE feels the comment is overly offensive and decides swearing at an op is the way to go, rather than counter arguing, so be it. You will find ops won't be kicking users making sound counter arguments in defense of their own alliance.
---
Severian wrote:3) Note: Part of the administrations removal of Whitey was apparent abuse of privacy. So much for respecting privacy and people's personal messages.
Right. Again, this has nothing to do with ops, or even irc for that matter. Anyone and everyone has the ability to copy and paste private conversations.
You are upset that quickshot showed homer what you said to him in private. That's understandable. It is likely, however, he would have done the same thing had he not been an op. Furthermore, it is not a kicking offense. Merely something that you may consider unethical as you felt the comments were of a personal nature.
Anywho, this is under the heading of "following protocol and blatenly breaking the rules". I just fail to see the relevance of this point to the overall argument. You confided in a friend, he repeated what you said to the highest power and did so with the best of intentions - Either his concern for a friend or his concern for the channel and a situation that you are escalating beyond belief.
---
Severian wrote:4) Note: Part of the administrations removal of Whitey was apparent abuse of Oper powers. Here we have a case of an oper, the highest authority on irc abusing his powers for a personal vendetta, breaching security, privacy and ban evasion.
So the whole purpose of this was a PERSONAL matter which homer used his opper powers to deal with. Breaks into our channel for the sole purposes of making a judgement call of me, threatens to post the PRIVATE messages and unfairly confronts me in my own alliance channel.
Unfairly confronts you in your own alliance channel. Here you are, bashing (or perhaps "making a judgement call of") a man that has worked tirelessly over a period of multiple years for you and people like you, on a public forum in front of the entire SGW community.
Way to show him.
You proceed to list of a number of courses of action that he could or should have taken.
Perhaps you should delete your posts and have a read yourself.
---
Severian wrote:Old Horizon, New Faces.
You seem to have this running theme about how Homer is doing exactly what Whitey did that led ultimately to his removal. What rubbish.
The fact of the matter is that were Whitey as fair, reasonable or dedicated as Homer, he would never have been removed.