StarGateWars Forums

one thing i do not understand about vulturing.. ive been accused of it more then once.

ok im going to use the server war as example. IF an omega player without any defense takes my planet, then i would take it back. BUT then y does his alliance members msg me saying that its vulturing./.?

does that mean the people in war can do whatever they want, and if anyone weak comes in their way they start massing him/her too..


another thing. if you arent going to have any defense then y bother calling out vultures? isnt it better taht vultures steal ur naq, rather then the enemy?

someone who believes in the vulture term, please explain this to me.


this is why i think the whole vulture term is stupid and BS and i will attack whoever and wherever.

I like some of the other posts on this matter. Vulturing... well like magni said, if the naq is worth the agro you'll get, go for it. That being said, you have to understand that alliances like DDE/Omega/Forgotten Serenity etc have 1 hit mass policies and you only retaliating to their strikes means nothing to them.

In the end, if someone hits you, you can hit them back. But of course, they can also hit you back for it and so the circle goes on (just getting bigger each time )

who started this term vulturing anyways?

they are the real cowards

from the looks of it 70% of the server agrees, however its the other 30% that don't and are the ones that mass for the 1 hit.

pizza_guy wrote:from the looks of it 70% of the server agrees, however its the other 30% that don't and are the ones that mass for the 1 hit.

This thread is over a year old..

so i see, never really looked at the dates. just did a quick review of what was said.