Page 4 of 10
Re: bebita vs jack oneil
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:58 pm
by High Empty
My Ss bonus is OPEN to ALL!
if both parties want it, both parties can have it.
IF neither party does then neither parties get's it.
If one party wants its, Well it's not my fault the other party was too stupid to wait and get it too!
Re: bebita vs jack oneil
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:59 pm
by High Empty
And I don't consider that as helping!
Helping would be what i'm considering doing!
Ofcourse then again i could just sab you both and call it a day
Re: bebita vs jack oneil
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:05 pm
by bebita
thanks HE to be honest
i wait his move and he trick me when i saw that 900 mil out
so jack you are a lier
i will let owned judge you
you was agreed with no help from friends
i don't know if they will like to have a such a lider of alliance
Re: bebita vs jack oneil
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:14 pm
by Zeratul
bebitza... the only way that HE would truly be helping jack, is by using own bonus, then having jack farm that off of him...
as by using the bonus by joining for half a turn, HE looses nothing...
Re: bebita vs jack oneil
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:21 pm
by bebita
zeratul mate
with high empty i don't have anything
he can do anything he wants with his account i am not in war with him
i am at peace he help me last week with bonus i am always consider him like a friend even if we was at war 4 moths
if you are looking in the first page i claim a fair fight with no friends help
jack broke it
Re: bebita vs jack oneil
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:42 pm
by retro22
honestly i think you use whatever resources you can.
bebita used $$,and jack used SS bonus(no matter whos it was)
have fun guys
Re: bebita vs jack oneil
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:58 pm
by bebita
he lost
next week shield on him
he don't deserve a play
maybe in 4 days he will be able to mass a defence
losser
Re: bebita vs jack oneil
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:59 pm
by iant
High Empty wrote:My Ss bonus is OPEN to ALL!
if both parties want it, both parties can have it.
IF neither party does then neither parties get's it.
If one party wants its, Well it's not my fault the other party was too stupid to wait and get it too!
Hey High Empty,
can I have your SS bonus please is neither of those two want it ?
thank you
Darth Tigger
Re: bebita vs jack oneil
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:19 pm
by Kikaz
Interesting...
Re: bebita vs jack oneil
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:25 am
by bebita
jack again to 0?
it was nice your ms
4 day and still waiting to be massed
Re: bebita vs jack oneil
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:45 am
by Neimenljivi
haha bebita u say no friends but then again u told me urself u sold 2 hours of work in main that someone bought u USS on Q. That IS cross-server and IS getting someone to help u. but then again if u say u did a fair trade so s/he isn't acctualy helping u - who says I didn't do fair trade with HE in exchange for the extra help he gives me once a week? Me and HE have a deal which we both do our job, a part of the deal is that I let HE farm me at nights, the other part of the deal is when I help him indirectly and the third part of the deal is when I help him DIRECTLY (these two parts I don't plan to explain u). So if u say that u didn't get friend's help by trading main UU for $ then I also didn't get help from HE whom I traded with 3 parts of the deal that help him in exchange for helping me to use my bonus. Oh and u DID buy USS when u declared war, don't go saying u bought it before the war.
Not to mention that dodgy amount of naq u got to rebuild MS few times and to build ur def UP and so on.
Polarising me? as I've said, u're a rank n00b.
And zeratull is correct, HE lost nothing (oh wait, I lie, 4 clicks with his mouse and 1 minute of time) and by helping someone u use ur own reasources.
so bebita u broke the rules when u were writting them but then again I do expect u to post crap that u did a fair trade and everything but me and HE did a trade too ya know, it's just not whole reasource-reasource trade but more like 1/3of reasource and the rest is other deal - reasource trade.
and I'm not such a coward who's afraid of getting of precious critical and u're the one who wanted rules at all and u wanted NAP forever with me. n00b. the only time u are able to mass my def is when I'm offline. Tell me exactly how many times did u try massing my def down while I was online? That's a total of 0 attempts. How many times did I try? about 5 or 6 times if I'm correct even tho I know it's impossible to mass someone's def while he's online and on critical but I kept trying and as soon as u'll be offline u'll be massed. But then again I can't be behind comp 24/7 waiting for u to be offline to mass u.
also just some messages I want to point out:bebita's msg to me wrote:Message text:
i don\'t want to be stuck of you
i know snipers accounts and what they can do
more if they can get extra bonus
we should make some rulles to not be stuck all this wave in our batlle?
my reply wrote:here are rules I offer you and I will agree uppon:
- * Battle lasts 7 days from now on
- * We both must be off critical (I think we both can agree that being on critical just wastes some time altho we can mass each other if the other party isn\'t online and it\'s much more fun massing someone who is online but being online and on critical = being unmassable)
- One week of NAP once the battle ends
- Last week of the era it\'s NAP too.
- * Good war, no hard feelings
Rules marked with * are a must for me, altho for example the legenth of battle CAN be increased, it\'s fine by me, but not deacreased
If u choose to accept aditional terms I suggested, the NAP things, and attack me while we have NAP (or if I attack u for that case), the naq is to be returned 3 times bigger amount + repairs.
you can suggest ur own rules if you wish to.
Also if I\'d be a sniper I wouldn\'t rebuild my account every time u massed me.
bebita's reply wrote:batlle to end before monday 00:01 game time
i accept no critical if:
nap will be forever
first who made devastaging damage to enemy is winner
if not we do not defend with devastaging damage it will be tie
something like this
msn is better if we need to negociate
i am not so good at english so i will please you to post on forums the terms of batlle
and I agreed to all rules except "nap forever". as u can see bebita just wants to get rid of me cus he knows what I can do and what I'll do and that he won't be able to have a good rank at the end of the era..
~Jack
Re: bebita vs jack oneil
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:45 am
by bebita
nice post
lets the batlle begins
why should i get stuck with a dead account?
Re: bebita vs jack oneil now vs owned
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:46 am
by bebita
owned you can surrender by kicking jack from alliance or you leave the alliance
no more nice guy
lets play
Re: bebita vs jack oneil now vs owned
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:44 am
by Zeratul
bebitza, you do know that cross-server trading with quantum is not allowed, right?
Re: bebita vs jack oneil now vs owned
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:59 am
by High Empty
Zeratul wrote:bebitza, you do know that cross-server trading with quantum is not allowed, right?
Techinally admin doesn't defined that as cross server trading.
As what is being done is Stuff in main is sold for Cash, and that cash is used in Q.
Or to be more precise, Admin get's his Cut, and he limits it only to 1 trade a week. The problem with cross server trading, was that it was unlimited at all! If things are in moderation they aren't bad, but taken to extremes and they become bad.