Page 4 of 4

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:48 am
by geisha
Nimras wrote:Geisha you have been told many times by me and other mods what you where warned for and that it werent a warnable offense and it werent for saying someone is a traitor.


Doesn't change the fact that I did get warned for it in the first place and that this only happened because Pianomutt reported me which I think is BS and not the kind of behaviour I would like to see an ombudsman have.

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:55 am
by Nimras
geisha wrote:
Nimras wrote:Geisha you have been told many times by me and other mods what you where warned for and that it werent a warnable offense and it werent for saying someone is a traitor.


Doesn't change the fact that I did get warned for it in the first place and that this only happened because Pianomutt reported me which I think is BS and not the kind of behaviour I would like to see an ombudsman have.


Well the fact still remain that it werent the word or for calling someone a traitor you got warned. Actually far from it.

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:59 am
by WeaponX
geisha wrote:
Nimras wrote:Geisha you have been told many times by me and other mods what you where warned for and that it werent a warnable offense and it werent for saying someone is a traitor.


Doesn't change the fact that I did get warned for it in the first place and that this only happened because Pianomutt reported me which I think is BS and not the kind of behaviour I would like to see an ombudsman have.


i have to agree with this assessment.

we need a uniter, not a divider. lol to throw some american politics into this.

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:02 am
by geisha
Nimras wrote:
geisha wrote:
Nimras wrote:Geisha you have been told many times by me and other mods what you where warned for and that it werent a warnable offense and it werent for saying someone is a traitor.


Doesn't change the fact that I did get warned for it in the first place and that this only happened because Pianomutt reported me which I think is BS and not the kind of behaviour I would like to see an ombudsman have.


Well the fact still remain that it werent the word or for calling someone a traitor you got warned. Actually far from it.


No it was because I called him "traitor scum" referring to ingame stuff and the reasons for his removal from alpha. And that was at that time classed as a personal insult hahahahaha

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:07 am
by Nimras
geisha wrote:
Nimras wrote:
geisha wrote:
Nimras wrote:Geisha you have been told many times by me and other mods what you where warned for and that it werent a warnable offense and it werent for saying someone is a traitor.


Doesn't change the fact that I did get warned for it in the first place and that this only happened because Pianomutt reported me which I think is BS and not the kind of behaviour I would like to see an ombudsman have.


Well the fact still remain that it werent the word or for calling someone a traitor you got warned. Actually far from it.


No it was because I called him "traitor scum" referring to ingame stuff and the reasons for his removal from alpha. And that was at that time classed as a personal insult hahahahaha


Lol actually if i should be correct it was calling him a scum that was classed as a personal insult.

Had you writen annoying scum or wrong scum you would have gotten it because it was considored a personal insult by mutt.

Well thats how i understood it when it was bought up and still does lol.

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:09 am
by Juliette
Nimras wrote:
geisha wrote:
Nimras wrote:
geisha wrote:
Nimras wrote:Geisha you have been told many times by me and other mods what you where warned for and that it werent a warnable offense and it werent for saying someone is a traitor.


Doesn't change the fact that I did get warned for it in the first place and that this only happened because Pianomutt reported me which I think is BS and not the kind of behaviour I would like to see an ombudsman have.


Well the fact still remain that it werent the word or for calling someone a traitor you got warned. Actually far from it.


No it was because I called him "traitor scum" referring to ingame stuff and the reasons for his removal from alpha. And that was at that time classed as a personal insult hahahahaha


Lol actually if i should be correct it was calling him a scum that was classed as a personal insult.

Had you writen annoying scum or wrong scum you would have gotten it because it was considored a personal insult by mutt.

Well thats how i understood it when it was bought up and still does lol.


Nim, the truth is not always the best defence.. sometimes you just have to admit that it was perceived as a line crossed, which was later seen to have been a misassessment.

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:09 am
by Brdavs
i have to agree with this assessment.

we need a uniter, not a divider. lol to throw some american politics into this.


Hence why Obama is the nominee. Sorta. You`re giving people the option of 2 McCains and 1 Billary (no pun intended bill lol) and saying "pick a uniter". Lol? Don`t think so myself heh. You need to expand that 2 party system, it`s not really that much better than the 1 party one heh



As far as BS warnings go... I think I got you licked geisha heh, remember, I got warned for saying you`re taking a phraze used in a derogatory way too far - for apparently using the phraze itself. Cause you we`re having kittens if I`ve gotten one no less. Heard me complain for getting slapped for the so called "inpartialities sake" lol? But if I`m using the analogy of your rationality I`m sure as heck not voting for any1 you back since that`s not exactly the "uniting" attitude, is it. :P

Let the uniting begin lolz. My money is on the position of ombudsman not outliving this summer.

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:11 am
by Juliette
The position will last longer imo.. I just think it's the persons occupying it that need to be changed every 3 months.

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:12 am
by Nimras
Rev. Auriel Daniels wrote:The position will last longer imo.. I just think it's the persons occupying it that need to be changed every 3 months.


That is the plan and why jack was removed and he could have been voted in again.

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:19 am
by Juliette
Nimras wrote:
Rev. Auriel Daniels wrote:The position will last longer imo.. I just think it's the persons occupying it that need to be changed every 3 months.

That is the plan and why jack was removed and he could have been voted in again.

Obviously not.. Jack became supermod, hence ineligible for re-election.
He's had his position for 6 months.. not that I mind that, he's a great example of how to be an ombudsman. :)

^_^ Nim, Nim.. how about we have 2 ombudsmen. Or 3. It's a busy enough job. ;)

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:22 am
by Nimras
Rev. Auriel Daniels wrote:
Nimras wrote:
Rev. Auriel Daniels wrote:The position will last longer imo.. I just think it's the persons occupying it that need to be changed every 3 months.

That is the plan and why jack was removed and he could have been voted in again.

Obviously not.. Jack became supermod, hence ineligible for re-election.
He's had his position for 6 months.. not that I mind that, he's a great example of how to be an ombudsman. :)

^_^ Nim, Nim.. how about we have 2 ombudsmen. Or 3. It's a busy enough job. ;)


Lol already surgested in the mod section, and yes i know about Jack still dont understand why lol but meh he seems happy and he helps out soo.

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:31 am
by Juliette
Nimras wrote:Lol already surgested in the mod section, and yes i know about Jack still dont understand why lol but meh he seems happy and he helps out soo.

Yeah well.. I can't see the mod section.. so I just suggest what I like. :)

:P

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:47 am
by Castiel
Lord Akaroth wrote:
Vendetta wrote:
Lord Akaroth wrote:
Vendetta wrote:I cant say i would ever expect any better from Geisha TBH, KGC suprised me a bit though. :/

And as one of your last acts to, for shame KGC :(


Wait till its confirmed before demening the character......ass cos i can say it :lol:


Id believe Bill over Geisha any day. Also i don't really expect Pi members to come here and side with Bill publically nor for Geisha or KGC to confirm it so with that im going to take Bill's word for it until proven otherwise.


Whos the biased side now....TAP..i mean TJP :lol:

All im saying is wait till its confirmed



Ohh this just in i just got a PM from A "source" saying that Vendetta is leaving TA to Join DDE...but since i dont trust your word.. guess ill have to believe the source..traitor...see things get ugly when people just say "shiz" without proof ;)


oh and nearly forgot...ass :lol:


your just a very funny guy arent you ?

Useless n00b try dropping the insults in your thread as no one is insulting you except me now , you trash.

Re: Thank you Geisha and Pi.

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:54 am
by FreeSpirit
Ok I see no use in the topic here except for the as always mud throwing at eachother. To safe faces of both parties involved i will lock this topic. Guys and girls if you wanna have a go at eachother take it to pm.

FreeSpirit