Re: Do you still enjoy this game?
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:30 pm
Another topic that came as quick as it disappeared! 
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
Legendary Apophis wrote:Another topic that came as quick as it disappeared!
Skunky wrote:Legendary Apophis wrote:Another topic that came as quick as it disappeared!
Hai
Eternity wrote:Could someone prevent more spam from flooding into this thread?
It has merit, and Thakallus and I are eagerly awaiting Shornaal's response.
At least, I am.
But I'm serious, there's no need to spam your own topic to death is there?
Ifrit wrote:yea ok...look people have the right to post what they want in a public form and the author of this thread already stated he doesnt care so, deal or leave.
Eternity wrote:Ifrit wrote:yea ok...look people have the right to post what they want in a public form and the author of this thread already stated he doesnt care so, deal or leave.
1.) Privately owned, hence, not public. Card invalid.
2.) Author of the thread does not have the authority to excuse people from the rules.. spam is spam, even if allowed by the author.
3.) SGW General Section. Hardly the place for more spam.. dump that in Misc's lap.
4.) The topic is good, as opposed to the thread currently. Thread needs cleaning, topic is essentially interesting to know about. Perhaps the inclusion ".. and how do you deal with boredom here?" might have assisted the thread to suit the topic.@ Green II. Providing links would've been soo much more helpful.
Thakallus wrote:Eternity wrote:Could someone prevent more spam from flooding into this thread?
It has merit, and Thakallus and I are eagerly awaiting Shornaal's response.
At least, I am.
But I'm serious, there's no need to spam your own topic to death is there?
Shornaal is searching in the section where i wrote in my previous post for the hints\answer to his question directed at me![]()
j\k
green II

Legendary Apophis wrote:Problem is, do we want to be serious (and find solutions for ingame) or have fun (to kill potential boredom here on the forums)?
Shornaal wrote:Thakallus wrote:Eternity wrote:Could someone prevent more spam from flooding into this thread?
It has merit, and Thakallus and I are eagerly awaiting Shornaal's response.
At least, I am.
But I'm serious, there's no need to spam your own topic to death is there?
Shornaal is searching in the section where i wrote in my previous post for the hints\answer to his question directed at me![]()
j\k
green II
I did have a quick look but wasnt too helpful but im under the impression your still enjoying yourself here.
Eternity wrote:Legendary Apophis wrote:Problem is, do we want to be serious (and find solutions for ingame) or have fun (to kill potential boredom here on the forums)?
Your question is: "Do we want to find solutions for the long term, or roll around and wallow in however we feel about the game right now?"
Asking the question is answering it.
@Shornaal: Indeed, while he makes comments to the contrary, his presence does suggest otherwise.. Must be having a lot of fun.
it might be privately owned but anyone can join regardless wether they play or not, so therefore when I state public its public to those that are here. Anyone is welcome to post how the want here and can do so at their own ability by clicking post, there is nothing that stops them and if you dont like it then add "spammer" to your foe list.Eternity wrote:Ifrit wrote:yea ok...look people have the right to post what they want in a public form and the author of this thread already stated he doesnt care so, deal or leave.
1.) Privately owned, hence, not public. Card invalid.
2.) Author of the thread does not have the authority to excuse people from the rules.. spam is spam, even if allowed by the author.
3.) SGW General Section. Hardly the place for more spam.. dump that in Misc's lap.
4.) The topic is good, as opposed to the thread currently. Thread needs cleaning, topic is essentially interesting to know about. Perhaps the inclusion ".. and how do you deal with boredom here?" might have assisted the thread to suit the topic.@ Green II. Providing links would've been soo much more helpful.
Rev. Auriel Daniels wrote:Shornaal wrote:Thakallus wrote:Eternity wrote:Could someone prevent more spam from flooding into this thread?
It has merit, and Thakallus and I are eagerly awaiting Shornaal's response.
At least, I am.
But I'm serious, there's no need to spam your own topic to death is there?
Shornaal is searching in the section where i wrote in my previous post for the hints\answer to his question directed at me![]()
j\k
green II
I did have a quick look but wasnt too helpful but im under the impression your still enjoying yourself here.
Must have something to do with that little exchange you guys have going on.. what was it about again?