Page 4 of 21

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 11:36 am
by Epic God
Kikaz wrote:It went beyond talking, there was massing done to Ares in that conversation, I honestly dont care if this makes FUALL look bad or not, and I dont see how this makes ME look 'low'. I simpily posted this as a warning to the three alliances you mentioned in that conversation that YOU guys wanted to drag into the war.


Their may have been Task Force members IN the conversation but it was surely entirely FUALL participating in it.
if i was online and they asked me i woulda joined in.. well, not massing ares. :S

kinda the only alliance i wouldnt destory.

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:18 pm
by Giovanni
If DDE wants to war soooooooo badly, go break your bonds with Omega and have you war.. Go solo, all talk about how bad treaties are, ROFLLMAO

Or just when the war ends leave your alliance, make a new one and go war forever.

Or.. are you guys just tooo afraid to leave your precious alliance that has been protecting you for sooo long :smt022 :lol: :lol:

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:30 pm
by Noobert
Kikaz wrote:It went beyond talking, there was massing done to Ares in that conversation, I honestly dont care if this makes FUALL look bad or not, and I dont see how this makes ME look 'low'. I simpily posted this as a warning to the three alliances you mentioned in that conversation that YOU guys wanted to drag into the war.


Their may have been Task Force members IN the conversation but it was surely entirely FUALL participating in it.


That is why Arkangel, Qacol, and a DH who hinted that they were going to be involved but later did not. :lol:

But as everyone said while I slept, both sides want to mass random people. Hell, I know I do. Just not with members of TJP.. give or take one or two.

You seen the stat building because of the random massings gone? A few nights ago, I saw some guy with a 35M army with 20M spies, and 5M defenders. It was utterly pathetic.

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:50 pm
by Kikaz
If none of you care, then why are you all crying about it?

Im not saying this ISNT the first time this has happened, OR that FUALL is so bad because of it.

I posted an MSN convo, your crying about it and doing excessive flaiming then claiming you dont care.

In that convo it was stated that, AK, T I T A N S and TPE were missing out on the war and how you were going to mass them all to drag them into the war.

Then mid-way instead of massing AK, Noobert stated that they were mH allies, or at least they were in the past.

And the convo switched onto Ares, which some of them were massed.

You can think any your reasons you want for why I posted this convo, but if as you claim you really dont care then why bother flaming?

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:53 pm
by deni
the reason is simple: seeking for attention :lol:

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:59 pm
by killtacular
Kikaz wrote:If none of you care, then why are you all crying about it?

Im not saying this ISNT the first time this has happened, OR that FUALL is so bad because of it.

I posted an MSN convo, your crying about it and doing excessive flaiming then claiming you dont care.

In that convo it was stated that, AK, T I T A N S and TPE were missing out on the war and how you were going to mass them all to drag them into the war.

Then mid-way instead of massing AK, Noobert stated that they were mH allies, or at least they were in the past.

And the convo switched onto Ares, which some of them were massed.

You can think any your reasons you want for why I posted this convo, but if as you claim you really dont care then why bother flaming?





Kikaz, maybe you should worry about your own account it looks pretty shabby and always has. If you call yourself loyal to the people you follow how bout better yourself to help who you fight along side with? Instead of waving a big flag saying look at what Im doing. You have always played a bit then quit. Loyal? I highly doubt your loyal to anyone but yourself.

Btw warned you that stats where still posted. I tried to help you out but you got a warning LOL

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:24 pm
by Giovanni
Jack'd

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:50 pm
by barbs
Giovanni wrote:
Aren't we a bad boy, it was pretty obvious that FUALL stands for Fk you all


Aren't we a bad boy, it was pretty obvious that FUALL stands for Fk you all[/quote]

</textarea></td>
<td width="80" align="center" valign="top">
<script type="text/javascript">
// <![CDATA[
colorPalette('v', 7, 6)
// ]]>
</script>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>


In other words - FU Giofanni :lol:

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:24 pm
by Dimebag Borgir
Curumo wrote:..On another note, dragging AK into the war would be pointless. Drag someone in who's been provoking or attacking (i know of certain cases that have not yet been punished)...


I like this quote. As I remember it, AR were dragged into the war when we weren't particularly provoking or attacking, and then FUALL have claimed that we're "meat shields".. I don't know, maybe FUALL could use some extra meat shields or something :lol:

Jack'd

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:56 pm
by Noobert
Dimebag Borgir wrote:
Curumo wrote:..On another note, dragging AK into the war would be pointless. Drag someone in who's been provoking or attacking (i know of certain cases that have not yet been punished)...


I like this quote. As I remember it, AR were dragged into the war when we weren't particularly provoking or attacking, and then FUALL have claimed that we're "meat shields".. I don't know, maybe FUALL could use some extra meat shields or something :lol:


The way I was told, you all voted on it on MSN when most of the HC wasn't there because of pressure from two TJP members. But hey, that's just what I was told from a HC member. :shock:

But if you were 'forced' or 'provoked' that is just a load of crap. You choose to be in it for yourselves. Just because you get farmed doesn't really mean anything new.

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:47 pm
by Dimebag Borgir
Noobert wrote:
Dimebag Borgir wrote:
Curumo wrote:..On another note, dragging AK into the war would be pointless. Drag someone in who's been provoking or attacking (i know of certain cases that have not yet been punished)...


I like this quote. As I remember it, AR were dragged into the war when we weren't particularly provoking or attacking, and then FUALL have claimed that we're "meat shields".. I don't know, maybe FUALL could use some extra meat shields or something :lol:


The way I was told, you all voted on it on MSN when most of the HC wasn't there because of pressure from two TJP members. But hey, that's just what I was told from a HC member. :shock:

But if you were 'forced' or 'provoked' that is just a load of crap. You choose to be in it for yourselves. Just because you get farmed doesn't really mean anything new.


the way i remember it.. we were massed into it, NOT farmed into it, but bleh, doesn't really matter

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:51 pm
by Noobert
That still doesn't clear up the other parts I put in. The fact you voted on it on MSN, etc. Massings are part of the game, it was your choice to join the war or not. You chose to. So don't blame the outcome on FUALL just because you got massed in a war game. :shock:

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:08 pm
by deni
Dimebag Borgir wrote:
Noobert wrote:
Dimebag Borgir wrote:
Curumo wrote:..On another note, dragging AK into the war would be pointless. Drag someone in who's been provoking or attacking (i know of certain cases that have not yet been punished)...


I like this quote. As I remember it, AR were dragged into the war when we weren't particularly provoking or attacking, and then FUALL have claimed that we're "meat shields".. I don't know, maybe FUALL could use some extra meat shields or something :lol:


The way I was told, you all voted on it on MSN when most of the HC wasn't there because of pressure from two TJP members. But hey, that's just what I was told from a HC member. :shock:

But if you were 'forced' or 'provoked' that is just a load of crap. You choose to be in it for yourselves. Just because you get farmed doesn't really mean anything new.


the way i remember it.. we were massed into it, NOT farmed into it, but bleh, doesn't really matter



Subject: FUALL vs TJP vs RM "Game Over!"


As far as I remember Free Spirit dragged you in the war.

You lot had still your defenses when he posted that ... kcjeep was kind enough to share with me :)

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:29 pm
by Robe
Deni is correct. FreeSpirit posted that Ancient Races were in the war before their HC had even met to decide whether they wanted to join (or not).

I was in one conversation where some members of Ancient Races expressed an interest in joining the war so I referred them to their HC.

Next thing we knew... FreeSpirit posted that Ancient Races were in the war :shock:

None knows why....but I am sure the truth is out there somewhere ;)

Either way, the rest is history and there is little value in dwelling on the past.

Re: FUALL's war expansion plans. (The Task Force)

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:36 pm
by Robe
Kikaz wrote:It went beyond talking, there was massing done to Ares in that conversation, I honestly dont care if this makes FUALL look bad or not, and I dont see how this makes ME look 'low'. I simpily posted this as a warning to the three alliances you mentioned in that conversation that YOU guys wanted to drag into the war.


Their may have been Task Force members IN the conversation but it was surely entirely FUALL participating in it.


Kikaz is correct. No members of the Task Force instigated this conversation, were actively involved in this conversation or massed any of the specified alliances or their members because they are deemed outside the war.

I am also glad he posted to avoid any current or future confusion.