StarGateWars Forums

AncientAnubis wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

Semper wrote:you're using the forums..I'm the lion here...

Isn't that cute folks? Semper still thinks he's important

Says an equally irrelevant player?

One does not need relevance to deem another irrelevant. Thanks for insulting Semper though, I'm sure he loves being my "equal" , at least in this regard...

Yeah, that was fairly insulting to Semper. I'd hate for someone to claim that I am equal to Mathlord, doesn't get much more insulting that.

Mathlord wrote:

AncientAnubis wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

Semper wrote:you're using the forums..I'm the lion here...

Isn't that cute folks? Semper still thinks he's important

Says an equally irrelevant player?

One does not need relevance to deem another irrelevant. Thanks for insulting Semper though, I'm sure he loves being my "equal" , at least in this regard...

I'm sure Semper is bright enough to realize that was not a stab at him. You, apparently, are not. Your sense of self-importance, at the very least, is nauseating. But hey, gotta impress everyone we can on internet forums haven't we?

Jack wrote:Yeah, that was fairly insulting to Semper. I'd hate for someone to claim that I am equal to Mathlord, doesn't get much more insulting that.

You are equal to Mathlord!

*Runs as fast as possible from Jack*

No matter how fast you run, you can not run faster then the ban hammer.


*bans Noobert*

Jack wrote:No matter how fast you run, you can not run faster then the ban hammer.


*bans Noobert*

now thats the funniest thing in this thread

hmmmm i should mass you semper for not even mentioning PI allegiance. then again if i don't like what you wote about PI allegiance i would still mass you. damn that's a tough call

perhaps if i mass semper now it will make me descide wheter or not to mass him

it was a rather entertaining read, som parts are true others arn't

zeekomkommer wrote:hmmmm I should mass you Semper for not even mentioning PI allegiance. then again if I don't like what you wrote about PI allegiance I would still mass you. damn that's a tough call

perhaps if I mass Semper now it will make me decide whether or not to mass him

it was a rather entertaining read, some parts are true others arn't

Mass away! My 24k unarmed super soldiers and equal number of mercenaries will fight to the death with spoons and baking trays.

As for Pi..well.. there is a reason I did not mention them! Considering the tone of the opening post, you might be able to guess..

Brdavs wrote:So you`re basically saying that your standard and optimal business practice is fraud? How... not out of character.

That is the most foolish thing you've probably ever typed. Did you live a sheltered life or something?

PS: On behalf of a number of players, I am still offended by your Israel signature.

LONG LIVE ISREAL!

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Brdavs wrote:So you`re basically saying that your standard and optimal business practice is fraud? How... not out of character.

That is the most foolish thing you've probably ever typed. Did you live a sheltered life or something?

PS: On behalf of a number of players, I am still offended by your Israel signature.

No, I live a life regulited by rules and laws. One of them clearly stating that fraud is an intentional deception made for personal gain and is a crime.
Now I dunno what you ment when you said you distract people and center their focus on only one figure of the equation "blindsiding them" in business but... the neck of the woods I`m from kinda thinks you`re auctonable for that if something goes wrong.
As in if you turn out to be full of it and some1 buys a cat in the bag. (Also (not) suprisingly not out of character kekeke)




About the the userbar... awwwwww..... thouth my political view on the matter bug thee?
You often find people of opposite opinion offensive, don`t you? But just for the lulz, which part exactly is the problem? PM me if it`s off topic to discuss how everyone should think the same as you do. I`ll "lol" back.

So @ you and "the rest of the lot": All the more reason to keep it!

P.S. "still" offended? Has anyone raised issue with it before now? I`m serious, slap me a link, news to me.

Brdavs wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Brdavs wrote:So you`re basically saying that your standard and optimal business practice is fraud? How... not out of character.

That is the most foolish thing you've probably ever typed. Did you live a sheltered life or something?

PS: On behalf of a number of players, I am still offended by your Israel signature.

No, I live a life regulited by rules and laws. One of them clearly stating that fraud is an intentional deception made for personal gain and is a crime.
Now I dunno what you ment when you said you distract people and center their focus on only one figure of the equation "blindsiding them" in business but... the neck of the woods I`m from kinda thinks you`re auctonable for that if something goes wrong.
As in if you turn out to be full of it and some1 buys a cat in the bag. (Also (not) suprisingly not out of character kekeke)




About the the userbar... awwwwww..... thouth my political view on the matter bug thee?
You often find people of opposite opinion offensive, don`t you? But just for the lulz, which part exactly is the problem? PM me if it`s off topic to discuss how everyone should think the same as you do. I`ll "lol" back.

So @ you and "the rest of the lot": All the more reason to keep it!

P.S. "still" offended? Has anyone raised issue with it before now? I`m serious, slap me a link, news to me.

Exactly my point, you are quick to answer any post I make without thinking. Here's a little tip. When you don't fully understand what I meant, don't jump to conclusions and post. Because frankly, when you do, you appear naive.

As for your signature, political signatures of a polarising nature are not allowed on these forums. It's like me making a sig saying, "bomb the middle east into the stone age".

Point one:
One can only pass judgment on what one sees/was stated. True intent is secondary to form expressed. Thats one of your constant problems. Allways you do/say something... and when it turns out that someone points out that it maybe, perhaps, in a way... aint "the best thing to be doing/saying"... it suddenly turns out "I didn`t mean it that way".
Ok, but how the heck did you mean those parts then? Cos I cant think of a particuallary acceptable way to conceal things via misderection and blindsiding in legal business practice. And I`m sorta of the profession in question. But I suppose that`s just me, from ye old regulated continent. If you have FFA I appologise lol.
But nvm, this is going off topic. I`m sure you only ment extremely well only expressed yoursef aquardly, as per usual.


Fact two:
Fun fact, I only put that userbar on after I noticed one who is a more prolific poster here than I having the exact opposite one.
You don`t/didn`t seem to mind that one.
I also notice quite a lot of political imgery etc. going on, atleast periodicaly. On veterans day one has to support the troops plus a lot of people here are in service so we have to be mindfull of that etc. heh.
So scuse me, but don`t feed me the "political signatures of a polarising nature are not allowed on these forums" line.
Rather loose the 2nd face and feed me the "political signatures of a nature opposed to mine/mainstream on this forum are not allowed on these forums".
That way I can tell you I`ll take mine off when I see others taken off or when I get it in black&what that the standard is in fact a double standard. But till then, my 2 cents is just as acceptable as any. Even if they happen to differ from yours. Is there a problem whith that?

Saying Long Live Israel and aka death to it are very different messages. Just take it down Instead of being negative you could of just made an sig of something involving "Pro Palestine" and I bet you would not have an problem

Am Heh, look up "boycott" will you... Sheehs. Its a looooong way out of the galaxy that contains at it center a phraze "death to X".

Don`t even think about disqualifying my legitimate action/oppinion via reducttio ad hitlerum mkay? Theres a good boy.