StarGateWars Forums

killtacular wrote:

KSM wrote:The wars in question (fun wars) don't look that fun to me. You take an alliance such as Delta (just randomly picked them) and pick 6 members to go against 6 members from some other alliance. Rules are set and they happen quick and nobody has hard feelings. It sounds good in theory but unless you are really active its just a waste. But what about the other members of Delta who aren't in the war. If I agree to this "fun war" I'm not supposed to take advantage of their other accounts in delta not in the war who make good naq. I think it comes down to activity, when I was super active back in the day, we (taf/rico's) had little wars all the time. They were fun for the initial massing or so but got old real quick.

obviously your just not getting it by the term FUN. (talking about this thread)
The role play some people put into there posts after there adventures in the game after a day of fighting. massing the enemy while talking to them on teamspeak or msn in one big convo. its not a pick a random alliance have fun with us or were going to mass u anyways. come on KSM thats how your putting it or making it sound.

Some people like roleplaying others think its silly. Fun to you may not be fun to me. Like I said they don't look like fun to me. Now I like to talk to other people in different alliances and if you ask around even fuall I'm sure you'll find I'm one of the most friendly people to deal with. I simply don't see the fun in these new wars. Say I'm active and I have a 500 bill def and you are online and have a 500 bill def. We mass each other and have a good time talking and joking around but in the end what do we accomplish? 1 person has a wrecked ms and both still have their defense.

J-ronimo wrote:Thank you for your lovely post Noobert, missed them much.

Two things:
1. What things do i lie about?
2. Why do you have need to talk about 'my wonderful side'?

You come onto the forum and say things like this.

J-ronimo wrote:It is a difference between affording and trashing your own acc.

There is no trashing your account simply due to the fact if you play at least 2 hours a day you can easily make it back over time, we both know you play more then 2 hours a day.

J-ronimo wrote:Nice kick in the dark there Noobert.

Scar Face, it has much to do with it, it is about affording.
Well, someone said dunno who exactly, why doesn't TTF build def like yoyo did...simply, we can't afford it.

Afford it? LOL? Bull **Filtered** **Filtered** you can't.

J-ronimo wrote:And people ask themselves, why this war isn't fun...

Ask yourself that and possibly, you can find the reason. Just in case you can't, I'll help you out.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerrilla_warfare
‘The enemy is infinitely inferior to the King’s Troop in open space, and hardy combat, is well fitted by disposition and practice, for the stratagems of enterprises of Little War...upon the same principle must be a constant rule, in or near woods to place advanced sentries, where they may have a tree or some other defence to prevent their being taken off by a single marksman.'

Bingo.

Norbe wrote:You know noobert, last time I spoke to you about that TA vs mH war, your reply was "I was new at the time so im not really sure what happened".

When I said we are peaceful I'm wasn't saying that TA don't go to war. It is a part of the game and it can be very enjoyable to have a good fight. It is just that declaring war is usually the last action we take, instead of the first.

About the TA v mH war.. Truth is that I pissed off mH because I massed Zireal after he'd massed my officer. After that you guys started farming me and TÅ pretty heavily . The majority of us did have good sized defenses, i had a about a 300 or 400b def which was relatively big at the time. Some of us even had 2-5 tril defs (311 and fabrin had big defs iirc). After two weeks of farming hits going back and forth and no-one from mayhem responding to our attempts to talk it out, we decided to get your attention the good old fashioned way. A one-night strike to wipe out your stats.

Yes, I don't know what happened as I went on vacation to Mexico w/ the family but I sure as **Filtered** remember the beginning like it were yesterday.

Are you sure about that? The only news about the farming I heard from you guys was after you massed us and then had 311 say some stupid joke, want a NAP now? Or something.

If you had such high defenses, why were you telling us the reasoning behind the massing was due to over farming eh? If we were on our old forum still, I'd show you the post.

KSM wrote:

killtacular wrote:

KSM wrote:The wars in question (fun wars) don't look that fun to me. You take an alliance such as Delta (just randomly picked them) and pick 6 members to go against 6 members from some other alliance. Rules are set and they happen quick and nobody has hard feelings. It sounds good in theory but unless you are really active its just a waste. But what about the other members of Delta who aren't in the war. If I agree to this "fun war" I'm not supposed to take advantage of their other accounts in delta not in the war who make good naq. I think it comes down to activity, when I was super active back in the day, we (taf/rico's) had little wars all the time. They were fun for the initial massing or so but got old real quick.

obviously your just not getting it by the term FUN. (talking about this thread)
The role play some people put into there posts after there adventures in the game after a day of fighting. massing the enemy while talking to them on teamspeak or msn in one big convo. its not a pick a random alliance have fun with us or were going to mass u anyways. come on KSM thats how your putting it or making it sound.

Some people like roleplaying others think its silly. Fun to you may not be fun to me. Like I said they don't look like fun to me. Now I like to talk to other people in different alliances and if you ask around even fuall I'm sure you'll find I'm one of the most friendly people to deal with. I simply don't see the fun in these new wars. Say I'm active and I have a 500 bill def and you are online and have a 500 bill def. We mass each other and have a good time talking and joking around but in the end what do we accomplish? 1 person has a wrecked ms and both still have their defense.

Finally someone that answered my question. thank you. Yes I have talked you a few times through a pm. in the end the accomplishment would be to put a smile on your face why would you play the game if your angered all the time? Exactly why each side has alot of players not playing at the moment. Some of your guys I actually miss but dont tell everyone that lol

killtacular wrote:

Tropic Thunder wrote:

killtacular wrote:

KSM wrote:The wars in question (fun wars) don't look that fun to me. You take an alliance such as Delta (just randomly picked them) and pick 6 members to go against 6 members from some other alliance. Rules are set and they happen quick and nobody has hard feelings. It sounds good in theory but unless you are really active its just a waste. But what about the other members of Delta who aren't in the war. If I agree to this "fun war" I'm not supposed to take advantage of their other accounts in delta not in the war who make good naq. I think it comes down to activity, when I was super active back in the day, we (taf/rico's) had little wars all the time. They were fun for the initial massing or so but got old real quick.

obviously your just not getting it by the term FUN. (talking about this thread)
The role play some people put into there posts after there adventures in the game after a day of fighting. massing the enemy while talking to them on teamspeak or msn in one big convo. its not a pick a random alliance have fun with us or were going to mass u anyways. come on KSM thats how your putting it or making it sound.

Instead of trying to get us to start new "fun" wars. Why not just try to make this war more fun, for both our sakes, both sides need to cooperate, im not saying that one side must or must do something. I'm just trying to suggest why not each side try to enjoy it more by doing the things that happen in your version of "fun" wars.

It would be nice if we could do that! but you see this didn't start off as a fun war some will say. It started cause our side did this and your side did that.

TBF its worth a try, if it works it works, if its a total piss parade then no harm done. It would be nice to try bring back some "enjoyment" back into the server instead of half the posts being insults etc.

Sry Noobert, but i seem to fail understand your points you are trying to make about my lying and 'wonderful side'.

Killz, here you have bright example of why this war is no fun...
...if people can't even agree on a color of a excrement.

Gee i guess PURE AWESOMENESS doesnt let you sleep,you cant get it out of your heads.....even if you think that you forgotten IT you are wrong

I personally dont need fun wars (i have big enough war with Fuall).

Fun wars are pointless any way(only good for training like friendly wars) beside that there is nothing "true " about them.

Now back to your "beliblisks MS issue"..........i wouldnt have big MS like i do now nor would i have 300 mil army size or AG ascention lvl if i would build defs so you could have some fun.

You guys wont have fun on my expences.............i will have fun on yours

beliblisk wrote:Gee i guess PURE AWESOMENESS doesnt let you sleep,you cant get it out of your heads.....even if you think that you forgotten IT you are wrong

I personally dont need fun wars (i have big enough war with Fuall).

Fun wars are pointless any way(only good for training like friendly wars) beside that there is nothing "true " about them.

Now back to your "beliblisks MS issue"..........i wouldnt have big MS like i do now nor would i have 300 mil army size or AG ascention lvl if i would build defs so you could have some fun.

You guys wont have fun on my expences.............i will have fun on yours

FUN wars are pointless? Why do you play this game then? if its to meet new people and talk hell there is a myspace and a facebook site for that hell im sure there are some dating sites out there too.

beliblisk wrote:You guys wont have fun on my expences.............i will have fun on yours

I take it your talking about money?

J-ronimo wrote:Sry Noobert, but i seem to fail understand your points you are trying to make about my lying and 'wonderful side'.

Killz, here you have bright example of why this war is no fun...
...if people can't even agree on a color of a excrement.

That's because you cannot see past the lie already in your head.

I don't get angry often in game or in rl. But I do understand the concept of these wars, they just aren't my cup of tea. Mostly cause I hate wasting attack turns on something that won't matter. But all the hate from the "server war" boils over to these threads and you can't get a real discussion on anything.

*edit*
alright people slow down I was replying to a post and there are like 12 new ones, all fighting the same old fight

You got me wrong.Fun wars i meant like arrange wars witch aint real war,or is it?

I have fun fighting normal ones

Noobert, what lie is in my head?

May i ask you other thing, what is aim of your posts?

J-ronimo wrote:Noobert, what lie is in my head?

May i ask you other thing, what is aim of your posts?

What lie you ask? Simple really. You think you can win, or have already won. Which is completely the opposite.

You think that if you continue to play like this, we will eventually surrender or get bored and quit. It won't happen.

My aim of posting? To get you to have a fun war for once in your little life. Duh.

J-ronimo wrote:Noobert, what lie is in my head?

May i ask you other thing, what is aim of your posts?

you can block his posts ya know

killtacular wrote:[spoiler]

beliblisk wrote:Gee i guess PURE AWESOMENESS doesnt let you sleep,you cant get it out of your heads.....even if you think that you forgotten IT you are wrong

I personally dont need fun wars (i have big enough war with Fuall).

Fun wars are pointless any way(only good for training like friendly wars) beside that there is nothing "true " about them.

Now back to your "beliblisks MS issue"..........i wouldnt have big MS like i do now nor would i have 300 mil army size or AG ascention lvl if i would build defs so you could have some fun.

You guys wont have fun on my expences.............i will have fun on yours

FUN wars are pointless? Why do you play this game then? if its to meet new people and talk hell there is a myspace and a facebook site for that hell im sure there are some dating sites out there too.[/spoiler]

beliblisk wrote:You guys wont have fun on my expences.............i will have fun on yours

I take it your talking about money?

In my case(not that i couldn afford it but it is out of the principal) that is men as ingame resources(that are used for boosting Ms instead of building defs)..............as for Fuall side its both $$$ and in game resources.

[spoiler]

Noobert wrote:

J-ronimo wrote:Noobert, what lie is in my head?

May i ask you other thing, what is aim of your posts?

What lie you ask? Simple really. You think you can win, or have already won. Which is completely the opposite.

You think that if you continue to play like this, we will eventually surrender or get bored and quit. It won't happen.

My aim of posting? To get you to have a fun war for once in your little life. Duh.

[/spoiler]

Isn't it normally a lie when you state something that it isn't true?
By this, where have i stated those things you have just mentioned?

Sry, but i don't get it, how could these things make war fun?

[spoiler]

killtacular wrote:

J-ronimo wrote:Noobert, what lie is in my head?

May i ask you other thing, what is aim of your posts?

you can block his posts ya know

[/spoiler]

Yeah i know, could even just ignore them...but that doesn't solve anything.