Page 4 of 5

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:03 am
by Lawless One
[SlayerS_fith] wrote:its not extortion im asking for repairs.
besides its only extortion if it was something absord. im asking to strike even or he can suffer losing more then he will gain.

besides now most of the naq is being sent back to the alliance for him being a coward.

and as for ascended..
guess you under estimate my account.


as for your knowledge.
please feel free to mass me.
my alliance wont attack.
if you feel so strongly about your opinion and that im extorting i say put your account where your mouth is.

15+ tril is not going to repairs you ascended account if you want your ascended repaired then ask for DMU and if most of the naq is going back to his alliance then let 187 send it since TC helps each other out anyway, you dont need to do that for him now do you?

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:14 am
by tsukuyomi
hes inactive....he probs will come on here in about 3 days or so and doesnt really care at the time RL has him.

[SlayerS_fith] wrote:its not extortion im asking for repairs.
besides its only extortion if it was something absord. im asking to strike even or he can suffer losing more then he will gain.

besides now most of the naq is being sent back to the alliance for him being a coward.

and as for ascended..
guess you under estimate my account.


as for your knowledge.
please feel free to mass me.
my alliance wont attack.
if you feel so strongly about your opinion and that im extorting i say put your account where your mouth is.


pay me or i mass you, is extortion and blackmail.

quick solution- descend him, and get it over with. or mass him back,.

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:24 am
by KnowLedge
bebita wrote:
KnowLedge wrote:Extorting was the word i was looking for. :)

where are all those people that said they would fight the extorters????
Maybe it was just all words from the cowards :)

but, its funny how you sit in a strong alliance, and then extort.. really makes beating you impossible doesnt it?

there is a nap that stops me ](*,)
and the problem is that oe doesn;t see this as a extort :shock:


I was referring to the FS members and Odin, :)

I actually dont have a problem with extortion, I think it adds fun to the game.. But
its hypocrisy that annoys me

and no matter how you look at this, it is extortion..

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:52 am
by Byrnes
Im laughing my ass off right now and im gonna continue to laugh my ass off for the rest of the day slayer i just lost a **Filtered** load of respect for you TBH you gotta ass **Filtered** in ascended now you want naq in main hahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah your ridiculous and your an extorter

Kick his ass 187

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:03 am
by ~matty~
have fun 187 :smt047

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:44 am
by HiteiKan
GUYS Slayer ISNT extorting, he isnt pulling the "My Empire Will Sit On You" card either,

hes asking for retribution FROM 187, not the alliance, he didn't want it from the alliance prolly because they didnt mass him on ascended,

STOP SAYING ITS EXTORTION.

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:46 am
by ~Snipez~
HiteiKan wrote:GUYS Slayer ISNT extorting, he isnt pulling the "My Empire Will Sit On You" card either,

hes asking for retribution FROM 187, not the alliance, he didn't want it from the alliance prolly because they didnt mass him on ascended,

STOP SAYING ITS EXTORTION.


:-k why ask for naq in main when it happend on ascended

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:50 am
by HiteiKan
Maybe because you cant give DMU in ascended?

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:55 am
by ~Snipez~
i dont see how that justifies it

but its up to slayer what he does 8-[

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:09 am
by TheAnimal
HiteiKan wrote:Maybe because you cant give DMU in ascended?

Sure you can, just a different way than in main.

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:42 am
by Lawless One
HiteiKan wrote:Maybe because you cant give DMU in ascended?

187 could let him attack him for the DMU

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 5:16 pm
by dazman
Just let Slayer have his fun seriously.

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:09 pm
by Byrnes
HiteiKan wrote:Maybe because you cant give DMU in ascended?

Why do you have to be a nut rider you know hes extorting.

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:14 pm
by Ra
dazman wrote:Just let Slayer have his fun seriously.

How dare he! Doesn't he know this isn't just a game?!

Re: Slayer Vs 187(id=1932107)

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:18 pm
by [SlayerS_fith]
either way its recources to my accounts.
dmu or naq.

he massed my ascended because i buitl up a large strike.
he didnt own my ascended and i doubt he could even descend my ascended account.

pitty tho.

ill just keep massing him on both fields.
and brynes losing respect for me over me asking for compensation or "extorting"
i guess we play differently.
im trying to spice up my game life. your demoralising it. kudos for you.

also im not pulling no alliance card.
ive always fought my own battles.
thus this vendetta.


and the naq will come to me as acknowledgement that i made my point.
otherwise how do i know it was paid?