Page 4 of 10

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:20 pm
by V|per
You have my full support. :)

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:22 pm
by Field Marshall
I am in, AT prices are ridiculous..

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:30 pm
by AeonKnight
Field Marshall wrote:I am in, AT prices are ridiculous..


That is our whole perpose brother :) I know my banner is a little gay but can everyone please wear it who has pledged their support to the cause? without it, it kinda makes the cause alot harder if you dont know who is supporting or not lol.

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 12:05 am
by Rottenking
IM WEARING THE BANNER

because i like the reason behind it

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 12:05 am
by Juliette
If anyone of you decides to follow your 'leader' and go pollute sales threads with links to this thread, you will receive a warning.
I would have expected at least some degree of common sense from you.

Don't spam. Keep your discussion to this thread, and this thread alone.

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 12:09 am
by AeonKnight
aha we have no leader ;) we aren't even a group. we just happen to have a common interest and that interest happens to be on the sales threads. yes lawless was stupid with all that spamming. theres no way you could of missed it.

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 12:18 am
by Juliette
Lord Helikaon wrote:aha we have no leader ;) we aren't even a group. we just happen to have a common interest and that interest happens to be on the sales threads. yes lawless was stupid with all that spamming. theres no way you could of missed it.
Leader, starter, first unmoved mover.. it's all the same to me.
Don't think I have missed your in-thread discussion with Lithium either. The stupid thing is not the part where Lawless was caught, but the part where people think they can actively pollute the market and get away with it.. don't like the prices? Don't buy the AT. Or be consistent and complain about the UU prices as well. Right now, it reeks of a silly attempt at profiteering from the market.

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 12:21 am
by V|per
Can you move your spam elsewhere? If people spam the market can't you just warn/ban them?

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 12:40 am
by Juliette
V|per wrote:Can you move your spam elsewhere?
Before we continue, is this a discussion or a let's-hold-hands-and-buy-ATs-for-cheap thread? If it is some kind of Woodstock thread, it will be forwarded to the dump. If however this is a discussion, my opinion on the matter is relevant. In fact, this thread is the only place where it is relevant, unless you can show me another place where this discussion is ongoing, and I lock this. :) If your idea of 'fair prices' cannot take criticism, it is invalid, as any idea which cannot stand criticism is.
So do try to have a discussion instead of a nodfest, yes? Thank you.
V|per wrote:If people spam the market can't you just warn/ban them?
I partake in the discussion, and I warn/ban the market polluters. So yes, that is the current course of action.

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 12:56 am
by V|per
Juliette wrote:If anyone of you decides to follow your 'leader' and go pollute sales threads with links to this thread, you will receive a warning.
I would have expected at least some degree of common sense from you.

Don't spam. Keep your discussion to this thread, and this thread alone.

I was referring to this and I fail to see the relevance it brings to this topic.
Anyways, I know this is the wrong place to bring this up so...

This isn't a "buyers trying to make a bigger profit thread", sellers are also participating, which actually cuts down their profit. If more and more people join us, AT prices won't keep skyrocketing. ;)

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 1:15 am
by AeonKnight
V|per wrote:
Juliette wrote:If anyone of you decides to follow your 'leader' and go pollute sales threads with links to this thread, you will receive a warning.
I would have expected at least some degree of common sense from you.

Don't spam. Keep your discussion to this thread, and this thread alone.

I was referring to this and I fail to see the relevance it brings to this topic.
Anyways, I know this is the wrong place to bring this up so...

This isn't a "buyers trying to make a bigger profit thread", sellers are also participating, which actually cuts down their profit. If more and more people join us, AT prices won't keep skyrocketing. ;)


my sentiment exactly. you can't take half an argument and call it the whole truth. I am a seller as are some other people who have decided to participate in this are. we dont have to do what we are doing but yet we ARE doing it solely for the perpose of lowering the costs. If you dont agree with what we are doing you dont have to post here. this is a thread on lowering the costs of turns so is mentioning spam not spamming? As if it is does this mean you are going to warn yourself with a possible banning?

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 1:26 am
by AeonKnight
Rottenking wrote:IM WEARING THE BANNER

because i like the reason behind it

I like your style :P come on everyone!! Wear the sig with pride!! :P i wont know who to sell to if you dont :P

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 1:31 am
by AeonKnight
Juliette wrote:
Lord Helikaon wrote:aha we have no leader ;) we aren't even a group. we just happen to have a common interest and that interest happens to be on the sales threads. yes lawless was stupid with all that spamming. theres no way you could of missed it.
Leader, starter, first unmoved mover.. it's all the same to me.
Don't think I have missed your in-thread discussion with Lithium either. The stupid thing is not the part where Lawless was caught, but the part where people think they can actively pollute the market and get away with it.. don't like the prices? Don't buy the AT. Or be consistent and complain about the UU prices as well. Right now, it reeks of a silly attempt at profiteering from the market.

Thread discussion? i sold him some turns :S are you seriously going to say i can't ask for less now? and i think you really need to look profiteering up in the dictionary. i've sold 5k turns today that i could of gotten alot more naq for. does that really sound like profiteering to any one? as for the UU. why would we be botherd about uu? There is always enough UU in the game, yet i see many plays scrapping over turns that just aren't there. but if you think about it as all the prices are interlinked anyway we sort of have commented on all pricing. 1kturns-750bn naq-1.5million UU. to me that has commented pretty clearly on all three.

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 1:36 am
by GOLDEN WING
im in ile only sell and buy at 750bil per k

but the prices are fair lol tbh 900bil per k i farm 20bil hit-50bil and i make 3T-5T per k xD so the extra 150bil naq isn't much :D

Re: Lower AT prices

Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 1:37 am
by Lithium
julliete that a good gest of a some members , theres no need to be consistent in uu market , price is 500-550 , while at's 750-900 way to big difference.