Page 4 of 7

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:15 am
by ~Sokar~
Pappy somtimes needs to go to hospital quite often so iam not sure its because of u clarkey. damn.. heat alert.... never drink again in 40 celsius

achieving more than u expected? rofl xD xD xD:D:D and who believe that? muhahahaha i will be so happy when i destroy your mates clarkey.. :D and yeah you don't care about them it s awargame.. sure.. so this is another war where everyone is gonna be be happy :D we'll see that :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:30 am
by Clarkey
~Sokar~ wrote:Pappy somtimes needs to go to hospital quite often so iam not sure its because of u clarkey. damn.. heat alert.... never drink again in 40 celsius

achieving more than u expected? rofl xD xD xD:D:D and who believe that? muhahahaha i will be so happy when i destroy your mates clarkey.. :D and yeah you don't care about them it s awargame.. sure.. so this is another war where everyone is gonna be be happy :D we'll see that :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

Yeah I don't care.... I've descended 2 of you, got one to leave and one has vacated.

Pretty happy with it so far.

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:56 pm
by Clarkey
ooh ooh ooh who's the daddy????


Lord Anderos[ Cult of Anderos - God]
Ancient God of a DESCENDED ORI
{Temporarily on the Protected Planets Treaty...}


demonlord
Prophet of a DESCENDED INDU
{Temporarily on the Protected Planets Treaty...}


Two more left SSL after I sent them messages telling them how they can end this.

That leaves Sokar and two inactive accounts in SSL

:smt043 :smt043 :smt043 :smt043 :smt043 :smt043 :smt043


Sokar you are the suckiest false god of them all!

:smt044

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:00 pm
by ~Sokar~
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

There were reasons why I started all wars on my own. Yet, I have not disbanded the alliance because of the alliance bank lol. It gives only a very few, but more than nothing. The alliance has not worked for weeks now so, good luck massing it. xD

What a noob you are Clarkey. At least I do some damage to my enemies before I extort them, and you.. bahh.. you just jumping here with a big smile what you reached so far, but it is nothing.. xD

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:05 pm
by Clarkey
~Sokar~ wrote:What a noob you are Clarkey. At least I do some damage to my enemies before I extort them, and you.. bahh.. you just jumping here with a big smile what you reached so far, but it is nothing.. xD
I don't extort people. I just made them see sense.

I have achieved more than you in this war. You have achieved zero in this war becasuse in this war Torchwood is not involved.... it's me and SSL..... so what have you achieved? Nothing.

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:14 pm
by ~Sokar~
Yes, I know Torchwood is not involved in this. :?

This whole war is an achievement of mine. You spoil your time, energy and resources on an inactive alliance just because you can not harm my account. That's why you thought you might harm me if you attack my alliance, but it failed. xD Please keep this going, and mass the remaining inactives and turn farm them. This whole thread is good for only whant thing.. to entertain me on the forums.. :lol:

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:55 pm
by Apophis
~Sokar~ wrote:Yes, I know Torchwood is not involved in this. :?

This whole war is an achievement of mine. You spoil your time, energy and resources on an inactive alliance just because you can not harm my account. That's why you thought you might harm me if you attack my alliance, but it failed. xD Please keep this going, and mass the remaining inactives and turn farm them. This whole thread is good for only whant thing.. to entertain me on the forums.. :lol:



I Gotta Say Mann, The Only Reason SSL Are Inactive Is Because Of Clarkey (well HVE Too) So That's Not A Fail In Any Way, The SSL Alliance Was Active Untill Everybody Left Because Of Being Constantly Attacked And Descended. Clarkey Won This One Bro So You Havent Really Achieved Anything, SSL Has Kinda Gone Down The Pan At The Moment :?
And Seriously Mann You Say About Clarkey Not Being Able To Harm Your Account But Theres Nothing To Boast About When Your Using Sniper Tactics, Clarkey Used The Same Method As You Did....Attack Other Alliance Members To Harm You Its Just His Way Of Doing Things Worked And Your's Sort Of Didnt Go So Well...You Know I Aint Got A Problem With You Anymore But That Had To Be Said, Soz Mann But That Is What It Is Ya Know ;)

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:14 am
by Juliette
Apophis wrote:
~Sokar~ wrote:Yes, I know Torchwood is not involved in this. :?

This whole war is an achievement of mine. You spoil your time, energy and resources on an inactive alliance just because you can not harm my account. That's why you thought you might harm me if you attack my alliance, but it failed. xD Please keep this going, and mass the remaining inactives and turn farm them. This whole thread is good for only whant thing.. to entertain me on the forums.. :lol:



I Gotta Say Mann, The Only Reason SSL Are Inactive Is Because Of Clarkey (well HVE Too) So That's Not A Fail In Any Way, The SSL Alliance Was Active Untill Everybody Left Because Of Being Constantly Attacked And Descended. Clarkey Won This One Bro So You Havent Really Achieved Anything, SSL Has Kinda Gone Down The Pan At The Moment :?
And Seriously Mann You Say About Clarkey Not Being Able To Harm Your Account But Theres Nothing To Boast About When Your Using Sniper Tactics, Clarkey Used The Same Method As You Did....Attack Other Alliance Members To Harm You Its Just His Way Of Doing Things Worked And Your's Sort Of Didnt Go So Well...You Know I Aint Got A Problem With You Anymore But That Had To Be Said, Soz Mann But That Is What It Is Ya Know ;)
Apophis, speaking out against Sokar. :-D True politics. Where's Ra when you need him to slap his System Lords in line? :P

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:18 am
by Apophis
:-D

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:40 am
by ƒëmmë ƒatalë
Apophis wrote:
~Sokar~ wrote:Yes, I know Torchwood is not involved in this. :?

This whole war is an achievement of mine. You spoil your time, energy and resources on an inactive alliance just because you can not harm my account. That's why you thought you might harm me if you attack my alliance, but it failed. xD Please keep this going, and mass the remaining inactives and turn farm them. This whole thread is good for only whant thing.. to entertain me on the forums.. :lol:



I Gotta Say Mann, The Only Reason SSL Are Inactive Is Because Of Clarkey (well HVE Too) So That's Not A Fail In Any Way, The SSL Alliance Was Active Untill Everybody Left Because Of Being Constantly Attacked And Descended. Clarkey Won This One Bro So You Havent Really Achieved Anything, SSL Has Kinda Gone Down The Pan At The Moment :?
And Seriously Mann You Say About Clarkey Not Being Able To Harm Your Account But Theres Nothing To Boast About When Your Using Sniper Tactics, Clarkey Used The Same Method As You Did....Attack Other Alliance Members To Harm You Its Just His Way Of Doing Things Worked And Your's Sort Of Didnt Go So Well...You Know I Aint Got A Problem With You Anymore But That Had To Be Said, Soz Mann But That Is What It Is Ya Know ;)


Actually they were inactive before Clarkey started in, only ppl from SSL that have been in our logs (HVE)were Sokar and Pappy (vac) and Pappy's was a retel hit for an massing and acing he received from Bel and me.

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:43 am
by Apophis
I Stand Corrected Femme :-D
I Was Counting Lord Anderos, Demonlord And Bendis Too Who Left After Clarkey's Attacks ;) (they were kind of semi-active)

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:44 am
by ~Sokar~
LMAO What are you talking about Apophis? It is nice from you that you try to backing Clarkey, you had/have a NAP and friends and everything.. but you should think before you write down something. If you checked our forums you would see that only 50% of our members had accounts on it from the alliance and there were about 1-2 posts in the past 2 weeks.

Nice try, but the propaganda failed. :lol:

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:52 am
by Apophis
~Sokar~ wrote:LMAO What are you talking about Apophis? It is nice from you that you try to backing Clarkey, you had/have a NAP and friends and everything.. but you should think before you write down something. If you checked our forums you would see that only 50% of our members had accounts on it from the alliance and there were about 1-2 posts in the past 2 weeks.

Nice try, but the propaganda failed. :lol:


What Am I Talking About? What The Hell Are You Talking About! Read My Post Properly And Stop Talking Crap Unless You Want To Go Up Against Me Again!
I Tried To Be Tidy And Tell It How It Is But If Your Gonna Start To Be Cocky Towards Me Then Good Luck Because You WILL need It....My Views Have Nothing To Do With Me Being Mates With Clarkey...Theyre The Truth Mate! So You Think Before You Speak In Future. And What Propaganda Are You On About? I See None? Im Telling It Like It Is...You Had A Few Active Members In SSL...Now Theyre Gone Thats Not Propaganda Thats The Truth. If Thats The Way You Wanna Be Fine, Im Not Going To Waste My Breath On You Any Longer Your An Idiot. :evil:

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:02 am
by ~Sokar~
If I'm an idiot than what is the one who can't write properly a text and start every words with a big letter. My eyes are hurt when I read those. Propaganda and idiotism because you stated as a fact that SSL went inactive because of Clarkey. That is a lie and a failed propaganda.

Your account was way better than mine, I get 5 million UUs from you, I get you destroy your own units in large numbers while my lost was minimal, I did not even attack you, and I still achieved a draw and get you withdrawed your forces in our last war. Do you want to repeat it?
:lol: :sge

Re: Clarkey v Sokar System Lords

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:23 am
by Apophis
~Sokar~ wrote:If I'm an idiot than what is the one who can't write properly a text and start every words with a big letter. My eyes are hurt when I read those. Propaganda and idiotism because you stated as a fact that SSL went inactive because of Clarkey. That is a lie and a failed propaganda.

Your account was way better than mine, I get 5 million UUs from you, I get you destroy your own units in large numbers while my lost was minimal, I did not even attack you, and I still achieved a draw and get you withdrawed your forces in our last war. Do you want to repeat it?
:lol: :sge


My God Shut You Moron Go Sniper Somebody Your Useless....And Mate That Wasnt A Draw You Sat There Staless And Didnt Even Have The Guts To Try And Attack Me, Your Pathetic So Just Zip It With The Forum Fighting, A Basic Beginner Accounts Better Than Yours Rofl...Are You Going On About The Crappy Few Mill AC I Lost Because I Forgot To Untrain Them LMAO Yes You Are An Idiot...And A Noob, Have You Ever Ascended An Account? No ! You Aint Got A Clue Mate Your Just Trying To Bite Now With Your Statless Account Because You Know If You Ever Built Something It Would Get Smashed In 5mins. LAME!
Going Back To That Draw...Nah I Won That Mate So Check Again....I Had Better Things To Do Than Fight Somebody That Doesnt Build....Which Is Why I Have A Better Account By The Way...Because I Dont Waste My Time On Noobs And Idiots Who Couldnt Do Anything To Me If They Tried :lol: Draw Indeed....You Wish!
Oh Yeah My Writing Style Does Start Each Word With A Cap...So What...At Least Its Understandable And Makes Sense, Cant Say The Same About You Though.

Ps. Clarkey Got Your Members To Leave....That Aint Properganda Or A Lie Thats The Truth! Deal With It.

And Dont Try **Filtered** Back At Me With A Reply To This Post Because Mann! Nothing You Got To Say Interests Me In The Slightest Anymore.