Page 4 of 5

Re: ME vs Clarkey [may be there till one of us quits the game]

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:43 pm
by abs
thank you

and sorry
but it is true.. your has friend never forgotten the dates my ascention account comes off its ppt.

and he is very "strong" in writting..

i am very "weak" in reading^^
but always reading your posts :)

Re: ME vs Clarkey [may be there till one of us quits the game]

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:02 am
by Clarkey
FrAnZiS wrote:but it is true.. your has friend never forgotten the dates my ascention account comes off its ppt.
Do you think it's difficult to remember 1 thing every 4 weeks. I descended you right at the end of October..... how hard is it to remember the next time would be right at the end of November? What sort of a person couldn't remember that?

Re: ME vs Clarkey [may be there till one of us quits the game]

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:02 pm
by ~matty~
when you ascend when your descended, it takes the descenion away.
it gives you 2 weeks protections from descions, and when the 2 weeks are up you can have enough gnr to ascend again from a descion.

take it from experience pal :D

GL "ME"
have fun clarkey :smt047

[spoiler]ME vs Clarkey[/spoiler]

Re: ME vs Clarkey [may be there till one of us quits the game]

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:01 pm
by ƒëmmë ƒatalë
~matty~ wrote:when you ascend when your descended, it takes the descenion away.
it gives you 2 weeks protections from descions, and when the 2 weeks are up you can have enough gnr to ascend again from a descion.

take it from experience pal :D

GL "ME"
have fun clarkey :smt047

[spoiler]ME vs Clarkey[/spoiler]


I don't think that happens anymore,

Re: ME vs Clarkey [may be there till one of us quits the game]

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 6:48 am
by ~Coyle~
you get your title back but you still dont get your bonuses back, i think thats how it goes now

Re: ME vs Clarkey [may be there till one of us quits the game]

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:03 am
by ~matty~
](*,) ain't i a slow 1 huh :oops:


have fun anyway :-D

Re: ME vs Clarkey [may be there till one of us quits the game]

Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 3:37 am
by abs
i recognized.. ricos_underlords needs non-descended players in war.

so, i will login in my ascended account. the second time ever..
and will build up ascended defense.

but i guess, Clarkey just will play as long as, dont matter how much def i build, it is down again

hm, you are not coming back to main.

This vendetta is over. I am the winner.
Open a new vendetta if you return back to main.

hopefully we never come to see us :O
again in main at all.

for ascended.. lets find out to where it goes.

i remember my ascended account got banned because my account in main was banned.

i will ask the admin section for getting it back
maybe they delete my ascended account i have now and give me back my old one.. it is small too, but build up. and was better than Clarkey's Account these days as it got banned.

i would have descended you very often, if it had not been banned.. i think.
we never will come to know...

Re: ME vs Clarkey [may be there till one of us quits the game]

Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:52 am
by Clarkey
FrAnZiS wrote:i recognized.. ricos_underlords needs non-descended players in war.

so, i will login in my ascended account. the second time ever..
and will build up ascended defense.
Good luck.

FrAnZiS wrote:but i guess, Clarkey just will play as long as, dont matter how much def i build, it is down again

hm, you are not coming back to main.

This vendetta is over. I am the winner.
Open a new vendetta if you return back to main.
How can you be the winner when you started this vendetta AFTER i had already quit Main and placed my account on vacation. You cannot possibly be the winner for something i did BEFORE you declared a vendetta. In fact it makes you a coward that you declared a vendetta knowing i had already quit.

FrAnZiS wrote:i remember my ascended account got banned because my account in main was banned.

i will ask the admin section for getting it back
maybe they delete my ascended account i have now and give me back my old one.. it is small too, but build up. and was better than Clarkey's Account these days as it got banned.
Are you that much of a fool? Your old ascended account got banned because your main one got banned for multi. Considering it was a multi, that meant your Ascended was the production of a multi and therefore was rightfully banned. You now have a new main account attached to it's correct ascended account. You cannot get a rightfully banned ascended account unbanned and replace with your current ascended account. Just build up your ascended like everyone else has had to and stop crying about it.

And as for your old one being better than mine is now.... very doubtful. And you still couldn't have descended me with your old one anyway. Just face it, you fail at ascended.

Re: topic is to close now. vendetta is done, as it seems

Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 3:29 pm
by muffafuffin
so clarkster you going to continue to descend him? i rather enjoyed this thread and would hate to see it come to an end so soon.

Re: topic is to close now. vendetta is done, as it seems

Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 4:23 pm
by ~matty~
muffafuffin wrote:so clarkster you going to continue to descend him? i rather enjoyed this thread and would hate to see it come to an end so soon.

:-$ #-o

Re: topic is to close now. vendetta is done, as it seems

Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:36 pm
by Clarkey
muffafuffin wrote:so clarkster you going to continue to descend him? i rather enjoyed this thread and would hate to see it come to an end so soon.
:lol: :lol: :-k :-$ Maybe. :-"

Re: topic is to close now. vendetta is done, as it seems

Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:39 pm
by Dubby_CompGamerGeek2
Clarkey wrote:
muffafuffin wrote:so clarkster you going to continue to descend him? i rather enjoyed this thread and would hate to see it come to an end so soon.
:lol: :lol: :-k :-$ Maybe. :-"



lol... agreed. :smt047

Re: topic is to close now. vendetta is done, as it seems

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:10 am
by Clarkey
LMAO seems Franzis can't handle a vendetta on his own AFTER he is the one that announced the vendetta.

Sarko wrote:I suggest you stay clear of trying to deascend rico\'s members or someone might just deascend you.

This is your first and only warning


Clearly Batz you don't realise I quit playing and only login to ascended to descend Franzis because HE declared a vendetta against me AFTER I quit playing.

Clearly Batz you also don't realise your pathetic threats in a text based game mean nothing to me because I don't give a crap what happens in a game I don't play anymore.

Lol I can just imagine you feeling all tough when saying "This is your first and only warning" :smt044

Re: topic is to close now. vendetta is done, as it seems

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:14 am
by ~Snipez~
Clarkey wrote:LMAO seems Franzis can't handle a vendetta on his own AFTER he is the one that announced the vendetta.

Sarko wrote:I suggest you stay clear of trying to deascend rico\'s members or someone might just deascend you.

This is your first and only warning


Clearly Batz you don't realise I quit playing and only login to ascended to descend Franzis because HE declared a vendetta against me AFTER I quit playing.

Clearly Batz you also don't realise your pathetic threats in a text based game mean nothing to me because I don't give a crap what happens in a game I don't play anymore.

Lol I can just imagine you feeling all tough when saying "This is your first and only warning" :smt044


if you dont care so much why bother posting about it

this is a great way to run for ohms this should be your moto ;)

Re: topic is to close now. vendetta is done, as it seems

Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:19 am
by Clarkey
Snipes wrote:if you dont care so much why bother posting about it

this is a great way to run for ohms this should be your moto ;)
Just because people post doesn't mean they care personally about it. Do you guys know what the word care means. Posting something to have a laugh at something doesn't mean I care deeply about it.

Surprise surprise the first response and someone mentions Oms. Clearly you cannot separate the two apart.