Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:11 pm
StarGateWars Forums
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Page 4 of 6
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 12:08 am
Be that as it may, I did not understand it, and politely asked for elaboration.[BoT] Jack wrote:Pops' is damn easy to read and understand.
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 12:11 am
That flew over my head as well 
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:42 am
Thank you.[KMA]Avenger wrote:That flew over my head as well
I am sure Apophis was making an interesting point, I just did not get it yet.
Looking forward to a play-by-play explanation of the point made. Thank you, Pops.
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:44 am
Cole wrote:That's because of another thread where Avenger said Obama didn't invest himself enough into the Japan issues to give help.
That surprised me that USA wouldn't step in to help Japan.
But on the other hand, I also read USA gathered $22 mil to help Japan, so that made me wonder...
Avenger probably meant "official" help, instead of population sending to Non gov organisations.
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:54 am
You do realise you did not change anything but the layout? The layout was not unclear. Your sentences are conflicting and contradictory. This is where my comprehension fails, to my shame and utter discomfort.Cole wrote:Cole wrote:That's because of another thread where Avenger said Obama didn't invest himself enough into the Japan issues to give help.
That surprised me that USA wouldn't step in to help Japan.
But on the other hand, I also read USA gathered $22 mil to help Japan, so that made me wonder...
Avenger probably meant "official" help, instead of population sending to Non gov organisations.
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 2:17 am
Jim, it's not a criticism, and we are not trying to make you feel bad because we understand that English is not your first language, we are simply asking for an explanation/clarification as to what you are trying to say 
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:09 pm
I purposefully stopped posting here until such time more information was available because regardless of the info i had posted prior in this thread-nobody had paid attention to the fact that Japan has a long history of covering up accidents.
So here we have it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haBovPou ... r_embedded
I don't like posting links to Prison Planet or Info Wars because they are Alex Joneses sites and i don't want to be seen as posting this from a conspiracist POV. having said that, i am posting these links anyways from the POV of a concerned citizen of planet earth after i saw a headline from yesterdays newspapers "Japan radiation reaches UK" and i am posting the links for the articles and links contained in the reports:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/a-new-chernobyl-f ukushima-nuke-plant-now-in-full-meltdown.html
http://www.infowars.com/f ukushima-nuke-plant-now-in-full-meltdown/
I said at the beginning i had a VERY bad feeling about the situation at F-ukushima and nothing i've seen will change that opinion
So here we have it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haBovPou ... r_embedded
I don't like posting links to Prison Planet or Info Wars because they are Alex Joneses sites and i don't want to be seen as posting this from a conspiracist POV. having said that, i am posting these links anyways from the POV of a concerned citizen of planet earth after i saw a headline from yesterdays newspapers "Japan radiation reaches UK" and i am posting the links for the articles and links contained in the reports:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/a-new-chernobyl-f ukushima-nuke-plant-now-in-full-meltdown.html
http://www.infowars.com/f ukushima-nuke-plant-now-in-full-meltdown/
I said at the beginning i had a VERY bad feeling about the situation at F-ukushima and nothing i've seen will change that opinion
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 2:28 am
Juliette wrote:You do realise you did not change anything but the layout? The layout was not unclear. Your sentences are conflicting and contradictory. This is where my comprehension fails, to my shame and utter discomfort.Cole wrote:Cole wrote:That's because of another thread where Avenger said Obama didn't invest himself enough into the Japan issues to give help.
That surprised me that USA wouldn't step in to help Japan.
But on the other hand, I also read USA gathered $22 mil to help Japan, so that made me wonder...
Avenger probably meant "official" help, instead of population sending to Non gov organisations.
[KMA]Avenger wrote:Jim, it's not a criticism, and we are not trying to make you feel bad because we understand that English is not your first language, we are simply asking for an explanation/clarification as to what you are trying to say
I don't see what was not understandable, I just pointed out I was confused by this fact: Avenger said USA didn't help Japan in another thread, while I read funds were collected to help Japan on the other hand, by NGOs. So I guessed, Avenger must have meant federal state help instead of NGOs help.
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 2:54 am
Avenger?
Over here Jim
*waves*
I didn't mean NGO's, i meant the US offering "official" help after official help had been requested by the Japanese Emperor.
Any thoughts about the above links?
Over here Jim
*waves*I didn't mean NGO's, i meant the US offering "official" help after official help had been requested by the Japanese Emperor.
Any thoughts about the above links?
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:05 am
I love that site now .....
Its quite Interesting i saw something about US sending in CIA agents to help Libyan Rebels without UN's consent.
ontopic
That 1 link says *Filtered* in it and doesn't work.
and another cannot be found
Its quite Interesting i saw something about US sending in CIA agents to help Libyan Rebels without UN's consent.
ontopic
That 1 link says *Filtered* in it and doesn't work.
and another cannot be found
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:11 am
The word "F ukushima is being filtered, i've added a space before the "F" and the rest of the name. Simply copy the whole link and take the space out in the address bar of your browser and it will work.
There's also these links as well:
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/f ukushima-mark-nuclear-reactor-design-caused-ge-scientist/story?id=13141287
and this: http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/03/80539.html
There's also these links as well:
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/f ukushima-mark-nuclear-reactor-design-caused-ge-scientist/story?id=13141287
and this: http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/03/80539.html
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:17 am
Removed
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:30 am
Kit-Fox wrote:I'll say that again so it sinks in. *No major radiological release has happened*
I've heard you, i heard you the first time, you don't have to keep telling me the same thing over and over. I simply don't believe it.
I'm NOT trying to be confrontational here, but it seems to me that i am whistling in the wind.
Did you watch the YT clip of Michio Kaku above? Any thoughts on what he said?
What about the GE' scientists that quit in protest over the safety of the MK1 MOX reactors questionable safety?
PS. This is one time i SINCERELY hope you are right and i am wrong, i REALLY DO!
But the reality is that the evidence (and experts) is showing otherwise
Re: Sparing a thought for the catasrophe...
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:45 am
Removed