Page 4 of 12
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:59 pm
by Retribution
Kikaz wrote::roll: Yeah and when admin J looked at all the accounts last week, all had different IP's and no trading of any kinda was going on between them in main or quantum..
Bunch of friends that changed their names as a joke.
I'm serious, mate. He was bragging about it on there. It's doesn't take a genius to make it show multiple IPs.
Edit: Actually, he has two IPs on his account in the last 10 days:
07:07 fredfred1 11355321139 Arbryn 391607235223 8,015 untrained units kidnapped 0 0
Dec 06, 2011 fredfred1 11466254197 orion2626 500787511759 5,096 untrained units kidnapped 0 0
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:18 pm
by Teyla
LOL @ all the feeders
dont know when they all gonna relise they just look like divs that need help to play bcos they know they couldnt keep up otherwise, prove me wrong and play as ur supposed to!
other games i go on this is a bannable offense and should b here too imo especially as it a reset game, where the balance? where the skill? how can the average player compete? pffft what a joke!!! any1 feeding will b a juicy target for me an get massed more than once no matter who or how untouchable they think they are
u better belive it
its not like im playing q wars to gain friends, win or be peaceful but im against all this feeding bs an those doing it deserve a good beat down so feed at ur own risk cos in my eyes ur cheats and i'll treat u as such,, with no regard
speaking of which see you again soon icebolt
ohh and hi kikaz
Kikaz wrote:aww little baby can\'t touch my defense =(
[spoiler]The forces of Kikaz fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 2 damage on Teyla's forces!
They managed to eradicate 0 of Teyla's troops.[/spoiler]
i did and no doubt i will again.
thats my 2 cents worth, feeding lame, the game administrator should pull his finger out his ass and sort it cos its obviously unfair to all those who put effort into things
bye
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:15 pm
by HippyFool
Lol good effort teyla.
Anyway, I am gonna beat all the people getting fed, perhaps even without getting any more USSs!
*at people getting fed*
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:13 am
by Quina Quen
I've been relatively quiet on the matter because I have an affiliation with Kikaz in the game as a member of Tormented. However, despite fear of reprisal both in Q and main I think I will leave this alliance and join a set of people who have no interest in cheating.
Any takers?
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:12 am
by Rn5ho
well, if people are not good enough, they go and cheat to keep up with the rest. That's how i see those who are beign fed. And i doubt any of them will win, unless they will polarize all other active players - pretty sure everyone will hit them hard for that.
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:52 am
by Kikaz
Never polarized anyone, but have been polarized by many..
Have fun, mass you all soon.
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 8:23 am
by Scenester
Kikaz wrote:Never polarized anyone, but have been polarized by many..
Have fun, mass you all soon.
08:05 ?????? Sabotage Infiltrated 25,000
08:16 Kikaz 380220796587 Akhal 1021061057635 89,710 untrained units kidnapped
08:17 Scenester 456961772590 Akhal 1021061057635 56,574 untrained units kidnapped
How did you know I was online, hadnt farmed for hours so didnt appear in the galatic logs 
Btw, 4th Feeding intercept *party*
Kikaz you do realize all the times you got fed happend between 8-9 am gametime right?
This way its not all that hard...Edit:
08:28 Kikaz Sabotage Infiltrated
Putting those fed units to a good use immediatly I see.
Loser of the year award goes to dun dun dun Kikaz!!!
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 8:36 am
by Kikaz
I sabbed you before I got fed, and just continued afterwards actually..
Your covert sucks btw, sorry about that strike/def.
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:05 pm
by Teyla
lolololololol
jst goes to show how right i am, u need to feed units to sab and mass, pityful, if it wasnt for feeding u wouldnt be able to able 2 do anything to anybody and u knows it, youd get OWNED
actually feeding or not youd get owned
by me
and apparently u say im a noob so that doesnt say much 4 u does it hahahahahaha
see u again soon sweetcheeks
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:45 pm
by Kikaz
And you think I care? lol
To be honest I'm barely playing this wave.. far too busy pwning main..
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:38 pm
by Scenester
Kikaz wrote:I sabbed you before I got fed, and just continued afterwards actually..
Your covert sucks btw, sorry about that strike/def.
Isnt that just exactly what I just wrote?
You sabbed me with fed units before you got fed for the (at least) 3rd time, and then used the newly fed units to sab me even more.
My covert sucks? Your really a fool arent you? My covert is constantly ranked between 10-15 just like all my other things, which is enough to get me ranked 5-10 overall. Which is where i need to be to catch my glory.
For people like me spending naq on techs and w/e right is a no-no due to the amount we have to invest in UP to keep up with the big armies so we generate thesame naq. YOU on the other hand dont have that kind of problem, you will just tap a guy on the shoulder and get a few hundred k of units which will generate bills of naq for you. So you dont have to invest in UP to keep up at all. And therefore have bills left to invest in w/e you want.
If only you could be less full of yourself for a second and perhaps think straight, there would open up a whole new world for you.
You totally forgot how to play normally it seems....
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:40 pm
by Kikaz
Or perhaps, I don't even care about winning or playing, perhaps I just enjoy watching so many people cry around?
And yeah cause the 6k units I lost sabbing you needed SO MUCH UU...
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:43 pm
by Quina Quen
Theodore Bikel wrote:All too often arrogance accompanies strength, and we must never assume that justice is on the side of the strong. The use of power must always be accompanied by moral choice.
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:01 pm
by Scenester
Kikaz wrote:Or perhaps, I don't even care about winning or playing, perhaps I just enjoy watching so many people cry around?
And yeah cause the 6k units I lost sabbing you needed SO MUCH UU...
I do think thats the only thing thats keeping you here hahaha, finally attention.
That last sentence doesn't make much sense?
Yeah Im way better off investing billions of naq into cov and def, and train millions of units into cov.
Because thats totally going to protect me from someone who spends tons of money on a game and gets 10k more units per raid on average due to having personal farms which makes his acc twice as powerfull as anyone else.
No...
Either way I don't give a ratsass about you donating, getting fed or what ever.
What DOES piss me off is that you CONSTANTLY go all defensive over both of these subjects, even deny getting fed to your own alliance members.
So somewhere... not even too deep inside...you do care...
Btw, I declared you peace because dastupy thinks your hits will hurt less 
Just go a head sit on me more, prove me even more right, you do care, in fact its all you live for!
Anyone who has critics about it has to be shutup immediatly right, you should go into politics.
Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:08 pm
by Kikaz
Deny getting fed to my own alliance members? lol
Who do you thinks doing the feeding?
Sorry didn't really bother with the rest of your post..
@ General Riveria
Kikaz wrote:Lulz.
Look I can post bold quotes too!