Page 4 of 6
Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:30 pm
by Empy
Almost38 wrote:if they post in his section i think he can
If Section Mods could check IPs then that would be the case, but Jack never posted in Suggestions/Reports which Clarkey is a Mod of.
Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:06 pm
by Clarkey
Almost38 wrote:Jack wrote:FYI: I'm not new to the game, and this is my alias forum account. I created it so I couldn't be punished for being honest. (although I suspect 1 or 2 people know who I really am)

Clarkey wrote:Yes some of us do know Sebastian. But who told me? Funny thing is it wasn't even a staff member that told me. Oh well.
and how did u find out check his ip?
Nope, as EMP said. And as I said no member of staff told me and I did not find out using any mod abilities. Nice to see you using your narrow sightedness.
Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:15 pm
by Almost38
I askex a question I never accused yu so no need to get ur panties all up in a bunch
Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:49 pm
by Clarkey
Almost38 wrote:I askex a question I never accused yu so no need to get ur panties all up in a bunch
You accused of wrong doing by specifically asking if I checked his IP rather than just asking how did i find out.
Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:51 pm
by xDaku
Clarkey wrote:Almost38 wrote:I askex a question I never accused yu so no need to get ur panties all up in a bunch
You accused of wrong doing by specifically asking if I checked his IP rather than just asking how did i find out.
That's still not an accusation, LMAO. You see it as such, that's different. Perspective differences - doubt goes to the asker

Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:55 pm
by Juliette
Clarkey wrote:Almost38 wrote:I askex a question I never accused yu so no need to get ur panties all up in a bunch
You accused of wrong doing by specifically asking if I checked his IP rather than just asking how did i find out.
Hardly. It is a directed question, yes, but it is not an accusation. It is an insinuation, at worst.
Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:05 pm
by Jack
Jack wrote:Greetings everyone.
Who the **Filtered** are you?

Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:16 pm
by MEZZANINE
Ids ( unique identification Numbers ) are NOT Stats ( Account Statistics ), simples
I never understood why a so called 'higher' ascended being should want to hide anyway, or why you should be able to find a main from ascended but not ascended from main, or why the ascended server even exists lol
Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:18 pm
by Sol
Clarkey wrote:To get someone's Ascended ID you need to God Quest until you find the one linked to the Main account. Therefore God Questing is basically the same process as spying and therefore should and is considered as stat posting if you post it on forums.
So if you get someones main ID alone through god questing its considered a stat

Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:25 pm
by The Doctor
Firstly, have a look at the link of the images Jack linked. That's how Clarkey found out, I'm guessing.
Code: Select all
http://i1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa410/ sebastian172 /Capture2-Copy.png
http://i1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa410/ sebastian172 /Capture.png
Secondly,
Jack wrote:As far as I can see I havn't broken any moderator ''rules'' in this post, so they shouldn't delete this one as well. However if they do, I plan to post this on my own forum and send the URL to the first 10 pages of players in GateWars. Let's see them try to delete that information! LOL
I honestly wouldn't care if you did that. You know why? Because it is within the rules. It isn't posted in any way on forums, therefore forum rules wouldn't apply. Good that you have found a way that doesn't break or circumvent a forum rule.
Semper wrote:Since when has ID posting fallen under the rule of stat posting? If you're banned from stat (statistic) posting then everyone who's ever discussed other players ranks, start date, forum post count etc etc should be warned too as that's just the same...
I've seen players being bullied that have posted the ID and name of their assailants in an effort to get help.
As mentioned by others, this is about the link between main and ascended ID's.
~Dä Vinci~ wrote:so you can't post id's when buying turns aha mods just make stuff up to please them self

As I'm sure you noticed, those are all just main IDs. This was about the link between main and ascended IDs. I'm unclear on whether main IDs are against the rule on stat posting (I've seen a post removed by another mod due to someone using my ID in it) but as far as I can recall I haven't modded based on main IDs alone.
Now Jack, you know my view on this. You were told in the first thread that you were not allowed, yet you posted another thread, the only difference being that instead of the IDs, you posted a link to a different forum with the same details of the original thread in it. Surely you can see that if a thread wasn't allowed with the IDs, linking to a thread with the same information would not be allowed either?
Btw, I voted no

Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:27 pm
by Juliette
Haz wrote:Firstly, have a look at the link of the images Jack linked. That's how Clarkey found out, I'm guessing.
Code: Select all
http://i1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa410/ sebastian172 /Capture2-Copy.png
http://i1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa410/ sebastian172 /Capture.png
Isn't posting someone's pseudonym the summum of all stat posting?

Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:31 pm
by Mordack
Firstly, unless something massive has changed since I was an admin, all blue mods are unable to do anything with IPs. I just tired clicking on various things for five minutes, and I wasn't able to do so, so I assume it's all status quo. As far as I'm aware, it's greens and above who can get up to that sort of thing (not that it excludes the possibility of a leak).
Secondly, please scroll up and read my post. I can include cliff notes if you like.
Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:33 pm
by The Doctor
Julietta Putina wrote:Haz wrote:Firstly, have a look at the link of the images Jack linked. That's how Clarkey found out, I'm guessing.
Code: Select all
http://i1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa410/ sebastian172 /Capture2-Copy.png
http://i1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa410/ sebastian172 /Capture.png
Isn't posting someone's pseudonym the summum of all stat posting?

Except for the fact the user (Jack) posted the images, therefore allowing anyone access to the links, providing us with his pseudonym

Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:38 pm
by Juliette
Haz wrote:Julietta Putina wrote:Haz wrote:Firstly, have a look at the link of the images Jack linked. That's how Clarkey found out, I'm guessing.
Code: Select all
http://i1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa410/ sebastian172 /Capture2-Copy.png
http://i1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa410/ sebastian172 /Capture.png
Isn't posting someone's pseudonym the summum of all stat posting?

Except for the fact the user (Jack) posted the images, therefore allowing anyone access to the links, providing us with his pseudonym

There are quite a few people using sigs made by various sigmakers, a few of which host their images in their own space. I could make a sig for you and give you the link. Not everyone saves their images for themselves.
What you have, is a suspicion. You have no conclusive proof.

(As long as you present this as your only evidence.)
Re: UNJUST MODERATOR!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:46 pm
by The Doctor
Julietta Putina wrote:Haz wrote:Julietta Putina wrote:Haz wrote:Firstly, have a look at the link of the images Jack linked. That's how Clarkey found out, I'm guessing.
Code: Select all
http://i1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa410/ sebastian172 /Capture2-Copy.png
http://i1196.photobucket.com/albums/aa410/ sebastian172 /Capture.png
Isn't posting someone's pseudonym the summum of all stat posting?

Except for the fact the user (Jack) posted the images, therefore allowing anyone access to the links, providing us with his pseudonym

There are quite a few people using sigs made by various sigmakers, a few of which host their images in their own space. I could make a sig for you and give you the link. Not everyone saves their images for themselves.
What you have, is a suspicion. You have no conclusive proof.

(As long as you present this as your only evidence.)
Like I said, I was guessing. This may have been the way Clarkey found out, I don't know.