Page 4 of 6

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:37 am
by Ryuujin Jakka
Every one is brothers today lol ;)


Need I say
HULKAMANIA IS RUNNING WILD BROTHA !!!!!!

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:40 am
by AeonKnight
Ryuujin Jakka wrote:I'm not arguing with you AK but don't u think lilfish just stood for what he thought was right , fish is a good guy I told him dot mass Andy well sort it out but he had already done the deed fish wouldn't have done anything of Andy just said to chill bro war on alliance was an accident I don't want a war , fih don't want this either he's just finished warring with Rico's and has been slowly rebuilding , tiki I think u would understand me better , why is it so much hastle just fr a mass , both sides provoked just let them har their fight or talk it over with them at the same time instead of. Moaning and groaning 7t naq fair hit but fish stood up for him self , u expect him just to let everyone moan back and forh in pm's Andy knows me well and so does fish I didn't want two friend warring but in
The end of the day it's a war game a little trouble here and there is goin
To happen

~ryuu


True, which is why i told fish and andy i'd talk to SS and arange a proper vendetta between them both with was sanctioned by both alliance commands, Fish just ignored me.

I'm not saying fish shouldnt of stood up for himself, but even in DDE its at least commun sence to inform your alliance commanders what you intend/have done. I didnt get anything about it appart from checking the alliance logs to see he'd massed, same went for huxley, did let me know about that untill he started to struggle and asked for help.

I think everyone knows i'm not normally the diplomat, but i wanted vodka to do things properly this time, thats all i asked fish to do but he ignored me, end of the day, doesnt matter what alliance your in, you ignore commands from your leaders and end up putting the whole alliance at risk, would they support you still?


And lol, wish i didnt have a brother sometimes :( if everyones so eager to have one they can take mine xD

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:46 am
by Bromas
Rudy Pena wrote:
Andy! wrote:No, I will accept it if he farms me profitably... Prefferably without saying he wants no war.

100bil and 40bil are profitable hits, brother.


Andy! wrote:I'm annoyed because he decided he didnt want war then farmed me twice knowing I was online.

01:56 ~lilfish~ 39,916,422,850 Naquadah stolen 15 384,092 537,044 2,483,903,154,350 2,877,119,269,240 details
01:41 ~lilfish~ 98,820,236,736 Naquadah stolen 15 392,313 558,730 2,483,903,154,350 2,958,090,993,260 details


384K UU costs more than 40B so no, it is not profitable.

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:48 am
by ~Tziki~
Yes Ryu, i agree sticking up for yourself is an admirable trait. However there was a destinct order out about hitting andy.

Whilst i admire fish's (daniel's) drive to defend himself, it wasnt needed. Andy is a young player, and fish knows better than to be riled up by a few trolling pm's.

Fish is also a member of an alliance, and these thing unfortunatly involve those around you, fish knows how we at vodka want to run things as he himself has a good say in it.
regrettably fish is not a good suit to a new alliance, i like him and hes a good player but i do not think he is suited to team play.


Enjoy the vend both of you, its a shame it came to this...

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:51 am
by Rudy Peña
Andy! wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
Andy! wrote:No, I will accept it if he farms me profitably... Prefferably without saying he wants no war.

100bil and 40bil are profitable hits, brother.


Andy! wrote:I'm annoyed because he decided he didnt want war then farmed me twice knowing I was online.

01:56 ~lilfish~ 39,916,422,850 Naquadah stolen 15 384,092 537,044 2,483,903,154,350 2,877,119,269,240 details
01:41 ~lilfish~ 98,820,236,736 Naquadah stolen 15 392,313 558,730 2,483,903,154,350 2,958,090,993,260 details


384K UU costs more than 40B so no, it is not profitable.

140bil is profitable. :-D

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:58 am
by AeonKnight
~Tziki~ wrote:Yes Ryu, i agree sticking up for yourself is an admirable trait. However there was a destinct order out about hitting andy.

Whilst i admire fish's (daniel's) drive to defend himself, it wasnt needed. Andy is a young player, and fish knows better than to be riled up by a few trolling pm's.

Fish is also a member of an alliance, and these thing unfortunatly involve those around you, fish knows how we at vodka want to run things as he himself has a good say in it.
regrettably fish is not a good suit to a new alliance, i like him and hes a good player but i do not think he is suited to team play.


Enjoy the vend both of you, its a shame it came to this...


Same from me and the rest of Vodka, Fish is a good player, perhaps a little too head strong for a new alliance but thats not a fault to him :)
Have fun fish and andy, enjoy what ever you do.
This matter no longer has anything to do with Vodka so have fun both :)

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 10:18 am
by Bromas
Rudy Pena wrote:
Andy! wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
Andy! wrote:No, I will accept it if he farms me profitably... Prefferably without saying he wants no war.

100bil and 40bil are profitable hits, brother.


Andy! wrote:I'm annoyed because he decided he didnt want war then farmed me twice knowing I was online.

01:56 ~lilfish~ 39,916,422,850 Naquadah stolen 15 384,092 537,044 2,483,903,154,350 2,877,119,269,240 details
01:41 ~lilfish~ 98,820,236,736 Naquadah stolen 15 392,313 558,730 2,483,903,154,350 2,958,090,993,260 details


384K UU costs more than 40B so no, it is not profitable.

140bil is profitable. :-D

140B hit with those losses from ONE hit yes, it would be profitable. But unless you plan on buying 750K for 100B...

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 10:23 am
by Rudy Peña
Andy! wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
Andy! wrote:
Rudy Pena wrote:
Andy! wrote:No, I will accept it if he farms me profitably... Prefferably without saying he wants no war.

100bil and 40bil are profitable hits, brother.


Andy! wrote:I'm annoyed because he decided he didnt want war then farmed me twice knowing I was online.

01:56 ~lilfish~ 39,916,422,850 Naquadah stolen 15 384,092 537,044 2,483,903,154,350 2,877,119,269,240 details
01:41 ~lilfish~ 98,820,236,736 Naquadah stolen 15 392,313 558,730 2,483,903,154,350 2,958,090,993,260 details


384K UU costs more than 40B so no, it is not profitable.

140bil is profitable. :-D

140B hit with those losses from ONE hit yes, it would be profitable. But unless you plan on buying 750K for 100B...
I think there would be some noob willing you make that sell. :D

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 10:24 am
by Bromas
Doubtful

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 12:13 pm
by Borek
98b off a 2.5t defense is not profitable especially if there's MS damage to factor in. Not saying he'd be losing naq on that particular hit (unless his MS was blown through anyway then maybe) but you could certainly get more just selling the turns, let alone the UU.

Obviously if Andy was farming then it's entirely possible he had more naq out so i'm not saying fish was wrong to hit, plus i got not idea what went on in PM's between the 2 of them, but just looking at the numbers on those 2 hits fish would have got a lot more naq selling the turns and UU he lost than hitting for those farms.

End of the day when anyone joins an alliance they need to respect the alliance rules and how they deal with things, i hope fish can find an alliance to call home, there's nothing wrong with standing up for yourself and being aggressive, just need to find somewhere that appreciates it.

Bottom line what's done is done, it's Andy's vendetta and up to fish what he wants to do from here. For the record Huxley farmed fish because i went to look at fish and saw the naq out and he happened to be on MSN, off ppt with a strike capable of taking it, i have 1 weap atm for raiding or i'd have taken it myself. It was purely a profitable farm hit, well multiple hits due to the limitations based on army size, there was no other motive.

7.5t is a lot of naq to leave out and not banking it whilst posting on the forum is why it got stolen.

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:16 pm
by Brothers
Ryuujin Jakka wrote:Every one is brothers today lol ;)


Need I say
HULKAMANIA IS RUNNING WILD BROTHA !!!!!!



can peps kindly refrain from using my name PLEASE LOL :smt081 :smt064

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:43 pm
by MEZZANINE
Brothers wrote:
Ryuujin Jakka wrote:Every one is brothers today lol ;)


Need I say
HULKAMANIA IS RUNNING WILD BROTHA !!!!!!



can peps kindly refrain from using my name PLEASE LOL :smt081 :smt064


He aint heavy............... :smt043

Re: lilfish

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:04 pm
by Catsupmotor
AK said it was common sense even in DDE to inform your superiors of actions you are taking that may affect the alliance. This is blatant falsehood. Everyone in DDE doea whatever they want. Lilfish is too careless with naq. I got him for 1.2 trill in 2 hits the other day. Use your bank kid!!

Re: lilfish

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:14 am
by Ryuujin Jakka
he farms alot and 1.2t naq on a 12t def :P

is an okay hit not that great :P

andy

when i farm hard i farm any naq on any defence
because i almost always have close to 2x my mercs as i do supers ive had hits i lost 2.3m uu and not very many were supers , ( my unit production covers my farming losses) aka any losses dont count ans lost profit to me :)

plus with all the profit over time gives me enough naq to buy that extra uu and all the turns back with spare naq , you may say im silly but when i farmed at my best i was probably more profitable than even the wise mathematicians on gw :P

some people dont worry about unit losses as most unit production covers it when they ppt for 2 days or find a big uu raid

which u do now and again :)

Re: lilfish

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:30 am
by Huxley
What is this witch craft?