StarGateWars Forums

Sol wrote:

Calibretto wrote:SoL, if you have the time, please create a top 10 of tournamentplayers as well, its fun.

top 10 of what mate? most kills?

for example and of previous tournamentwinners. Maybe other suggestions?

Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.

Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.

Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.

Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.

I only record the kills, permanently, logs are stripped after the arena, and the personal logs will vanish normally (two weeks or whatever it is).

Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.

Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.

Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is ok

We dont want to make you even more intelligent then you already are

Calibretto wrote:We dont want to make you even more intelligent then you already are

HA! Hilarious! *sits back watching Sol's head grow bigger and wonders how he's gonna get through the door*

GhostyGoo wrote:

Calibretto wrote:We dont want to make you even more intelligent then you already are

HA! Hilarious! *sits back watching Sol's head grow bigger and wonders how he's gonna get through the door*

Well I was actually talking to her...

Ghosty we cant have sols head grow bigger, we still need him

Calibretto wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.

Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.

Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is ok

I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...

Sol wrote:

Calibretto wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.

Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.

Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is ok

I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...

Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVerses

No need to reinvent a wheel.

Cersei Lannister wrote:

Sol wrote:

Calibretto wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.

Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.

Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is ok

I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...

Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVerses

No need to reinvent a wheel.

hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .

I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...

We do already have an overall rank for the past games in kill history.

Sol wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:

Sol wrote:

Calibretto wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.

Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.

Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is ok

I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...

Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVerses

No need to reinvent a wheel.

hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .

True. But list the 'highest' stats people build instead?

Sol wrote:I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...

My word. That sounds exquisite. I understood exactly 93% of that, and the idea I got out of that, is good.

Sol wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:

Sol wrote:

Calibretto wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.

Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.

Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is ok

I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...

Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVerses

No need to reinvent a wheel.

hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .

I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...

We do already have an overall rank for the past games in kill history.

...love it...on the other hand...I never was in the other tounaments

Calibretto wrote:

Sol wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:

Sol wrote:

Calibretto wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.

Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.

Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is ok

I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...

Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVerses

No need to reinvent a wheel.

hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .

I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...

We do already have an overall rank for the past games in kill history.

...love it...on the other hand...I never was in the other tounaments

div-null error risk!

Cersei Lannister wrote:

Sol wrote:hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .

True. But list the 'highest' stats people build instead?

Could I suppose, it's possible, but it would require constant checks and such and a bit of a hustle in the DB.

Cersei Lannister wrote:

Sol wrote:I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...

My word. That sounds exquisite. I understood exactly 93% of that, and the idea I got out of that, is good.

It's practically an average of your outcome in each tournament, then ranked against others.
Example (out of 3 tournaments):
Player A: rank 1, rank 5, rank 2, AV=2.67
Player B: rank 2, rank 1, rank 1, AV=1.33
Player C: didnt enter, rank 3, rank 3, AV= (However many people entered the first + 3 +3)/3
if we assume in the first tournament 5 people played then player C's average is 3.667

So player B's tournament skill rank is 1, Player A's is rank 2, and player C is rank 3

The rank effectively shows how likely you are to get rank 1 or very close to rank 1 in any given tournament, so it's practically showing how skilled and tactical a fighter you are in a pressured environment.

Cersei Lannister wrote:

Calibretto wrote:

Sol wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:

Sol wrote:

Calibretto wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.

Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.

Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is ok

I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...

Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVerses

No need to reinvent a wheel.

hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .

I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...

We do already have an overall rank for the past games in kill history.

...love it...on the other hand...I never was in the other tounaments

div-null error risk!

(Inverse rank 0 ) +1, ultimate div-null turn around

Sol wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:

Calibretto wrote:

Sol wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:

Sol wrote:

Calibretto wrote:

Cersei Lannister wrote:Seeing how the 'Top Ten' is basically a free-recon-fest, I do not believe there is much to be gained from watching this specific to Arenas.

Of course, I am completely in favour of extremely detailed Arena historical statistics.

Well, I cant explain it in details very well, but I mean indeed statistics where the previous winners are listed; previous top3 or top10. Maybe a little less then extremely detailed, but detailed is ok

I could do that, but not now, no point really, we have only had a handful of tournaments...

Something like Quantum's Legends could work? http://quantumgate.gatewars.com/legends ... ntumVerses

No need to reinvent a wheel.

hmm...the problem is we anticipate that people will be demolished, and so there will be always little to no stats on anyone .

I just thought of something, like a sort of average tournament rank, pretty much adds your tournament ranks together, divides by how many tournaments you entered and sorts accordingly (including how many you actually entered, so it stops someone from just entering 1 tournament, getting rank 1 and just not entering any others).
So in essence it will display what you roughly get per each tournament, perhaps i could use the trapezoidal approximation instead...

We do already have an overall rank for the past games in kill history.

...love it...on the other hand...I never was in the other tounaments

div-null error risk!

(Inverse rank 0 ) +1, ultimate div-null turn around

Boom, snap! I got mathed. You are so evil. Keep it up, it leads to good things.