StarGateWars Forums

Duck Dodgers wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:Its a sever war team battle idea everyone send a minimum oF 10 members, 10 constitutes alliance or empire representation..then the scenario..either us vs them, them vs those or all of these vs all of these etc etc etc etc yadda yadda ya.

Would be cool if each alliance, who sends in 10, do an entry fee of 50 trillion, (5t per participant) and in the end, the winning team takes all.

Each alliance would then work independently to win.
Winning team decided by the best kills versus losses ratio

Nice one duck...just a question,who would safeguard the entry nag?

Fallen Gabriel wrote:

Duck Dodgers wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:Its a sever war team battle idea everyone send a minimum oF 10 members, 10 constitutes alliance or empire representation..then the scenario..either us vs them, them vs those or all of these vs all of these etc etc etc etc yadda yadda ya.

Would be cool if each alliance, who sends in 10, do an entry fee of 50 trillion, (5t per participant) and in the end, the winning team takes all.

Each alliance would then work independently to win.
Winning team decided by the best kills versus losses ratio

Nice one duck...just a question,who would safeguard the entry nag?

I'd go with willy on that one

Dexter Morgan™ wrote:Oh we have 5 in FP at the very least that have proven themselves battle worthy.

We? I thought you left the Forgotten Empire, or what not, for reason x, y and z. Hence your app to us. Shouldn't it be 'They have 5 in FP...'
Anyway, FP are classed as independent, so training alliance can't be used as an excuse. Can't be a training alliance to yourself. That being said, I think FM's reply had to be one of the greatest I have ever read >.< Just one behind 'Insert smart-ass reply here'. Can't remember who posted that, but made me lmao. To summarize, FM is funny (genuinely, not sarcastically), Dex confuses me, FP should have better excuses.

Gohan wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:..real life killing allowed!

**Filtered** just got real

LMAO!

Best quote of ETL ive seen in years!

~Tziki~ wrote:

Gohan wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:..real life killing allowed!

**Filtered** just got real

LMAO!

Best quote of ETL ive seen in years!

But who was it aimed at?

Duck Dodgers wrote:

Drahazar wrote:

Duck Dodgers wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:Its a sever war team battle idea everyone send a minimum oF 10 members, 10 constitutes alliance or empire representation..then the scenario..either us vs them, them vs those or all of these vs all of these etc etc etc etc yadda yadda ya.

Would be cool if each alliance, who sends in 10, do an entry fee of 50 trillion, (5t per participant) and in the end, the winning team takes all.

Each alliance would then work independently to win.
Winning team decided by the best kills versus losses ratio

a prize would be fun, but i think kill/death ratios would be hard to do

Actually, that is quite simple to do with instructions set:

reset ME before each team vs team battle, post beginning and end ME
If both sides do this, you can even filter out incorrect entries (cheating attempts to get extra score) , seeing as results from both sides, all added up, should have near close the same numbers.
ie team a's kills should nearly resemble team b's losses, and vice versa.

in the end, simply do some math on the totals and voila.

It actually requires you to mind your stats and losses, and not mindlessly throw resources at it ....

Easier to play it fair... soon as your 0 you are out confirm time kills and if 0 member plays on DQ +1 member final score gets tallied at end

Silliness! Empires must risk ALL their members or this is pointless!

xXxsephirothxXx wrote:

Duck Dodgers wrote:

Drahazar wrote:

Duck Dodgers wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:Its a sever war team battle idea everyone send a minimum oF 10 members, 10 constitutes alliance or empire representation..then the scenario..either us vs them, them vs those or all of these vs all of these etc etc etc etc yadda yadda ya.

Would be cool if each alliance, who sends in 10, do an entry fee of 50 trillion, (5t per participant) and in the end, the winning team takes all.

Each alliance would then work independently to win.
Winning team decided by the best kills versus losses ratio

a prize would be fun, but i think kill/death ratios would be hard to do

Actually, that is quite simple to do with instructions set:

reset ME before each team vs team battle, post beginning and end ME
If both sides do this, you can even filter out incorrect entries (cheating attempts to get extra score) , seeing as results from both sides, all added up, should have near close the same numbers.
ie team a's kills should nearly resemble team b's losses, and vice versa.

in the end, simply do some math on the totals and voila.

It actually requires you to mind your stats and losses, and not mindlessly throw resources at it ....

Easier to play it fair... soon as your 0 you are out confirm time kills and if 0 member plays on DQ +1 member final score gets tallied at end

Though that sounds enticing, it leaves the strong at the top ... however, assuming alliances would be represented by their most prominent warriors, it actually could work very well. Only issue I see with that is starting times. With arranged matches at given starting times on which both agree, it could work very well.

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Silliness! Empires must risk ALL their members or this is pointless!

I would guess the team battles have more of a competitive nature then an all out slaughter fest.
Now go eat some catnip before I take a poop in your litter box.

Duck Dodgers wrote:

xXxsephirothxXx wrote:

Duck Dodgers wrote:

Drahazar wrote:

Duck Dodgers wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:Its a sever war team battle idea everyone send a minimum oF 10 members, 10 constitutes alliance or empire representation..then the scenario..either us vs them, them vs those or all of these vs all of these etc etc etc etc yadda yadda ya.

Would be cool if each alliance, who sends in 10, do an entry fee of 50 trillion, (5t per participant) and in the end, the winning team takes all.

Each alliance would then work independently to win.
Winning team decided by the best kills versus losses ratio

a prize would be fun, but i think kill/death ratios would be hard to do

Actually, that is quite simple to do with instructions set:

reset ME before each team vs team battle, post beginning and end ME
If both sides do this, you can even filter out incorrect entries (cheating attempts to get extra score) , seeing as results from both sides, all added up, should have near close the same numbers.
ie team a's kills should nearly resemble team b's losses, and vice versa.

in the end, simply do some math on the totals and voila.

It actually requires you to mind your stats and losses, and not mindlessly throw resources at it ....

Easier to play it fair... soon as your 0 you are out confirm time kills and if 0 member plays on DQ +1 member final score gets tallied at end

Though that sounds enticing, it leaves the strong at the top ... however, assuming alliances would be represented by their most prominent warriors, it actually could work very well. Only issue I see with that is starting times. With arranged matches at given starting times on which both agree, it could work very well.

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:Silliness! Empires must risk ALL their members or this is pointless!

I would guess the team battles have more of a competitive nature then an all out slaughter fest.
Now go eat some catnip before I take a poop in your litter box.

I'd like to see you try...in real life!

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Duck Dodgers wrote:
I would guess the team battles have more of a competitive nature then an all out slaughter fest.
Now go eat some catnip before I take a poop in your litter box.

I'd like to see you try...in real life!

I doubt your litter box is big enough

Duck Dodgers wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Duck Dodgers wrote:
I would guess the team battles have more of a competitive nature then an all out slaughter fest.
Now go eat some catnip before I take a poop in your litter box.

I'd like to see you try...in real life!

I doubt your litter box is big enough

Want your balls sliced or diced? My cousins, the Royal Bengals are hungry.

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Duck Dodgers wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Duck Dodgers wrote:
I would guess the team battles have more of a competitive nature then an all out slaughter fest.
Now go eat some catnip before I take a poop in your litter box.

I'd like to see you try...in real life!

I doubt your litter box is big enough

Want your balls sliced or diced? My cousins, the Royal Bengals are hungry.

You need cousins ? **Filtered**

The pre server war has started already, word fight.

I say let those that want to play, play, those that don't don't, and those that think of ways to not get into it stay in hiding.

Put all participating alliances in a hat
Draw for team a and team b
That's your 2 sides
Make an initial time limit but no rules other than that

Or


A battle royale dog eat dog, every man, woman and child for themselves.

Jedi~Tank wrote:

A battle royale dog eat dog, every man, woman and child for themselves.

FREE FOR ALL! i would very much like to see this and the dynamic it might hold
try and knock out one alliance? or take out the top guys first? all while being attacked by two talented and uncoordinated attacks.. ..