StarGateWars Forums

Just dont use anything Jenny cooks! :p

Tok`ra wrote:Just dont use anything Jenny cooks! :p

be nice and get on topic mate... back to the commentary of the cia oath...

yawn!

Taxonomist3 wrote:

Tok`ra wrote:Just dont use anything Jenny cooks! :p

be nice and get on topic mate... back to the commentary of the cia oath...

yawn!

No..no by all means discuss honey-mustard dip in your thread commentating about our oath!

Me....sarcastic.....never

pfft they stole that recipe from the DDE Culinary section

Are you sure? For it to come from DDE it seems like it would be a bit more spammy =)



Always out of respect my Lord.

[BERSERKER] wrote:To comment...

I think that the oath is somewhat dramatic but I guess it gets the point across.

I would like to say that Coalition of Independent Alliances is a really silly name i would like to know who though of it. (Coalition of Paragons aint much better fellas! )

Oh well viva la "CIA" vs CoP war may the side that doesn't lose win !

And the Grand Alliance was any better?

Taxonomist3 wrote:

geisha wrote:

S T I wrote:

geisha wrote:

Balhaar wrote:

Taxonomist3 wrote:

Dundee wrote: as long as CoP and its leaders force unto us their rule in this game.

huh? And how exactly did we force you into giving up your first born?

You were all to glad to give away that crying little thing!

Am i the only one who thought that made no sense? but what COP would want with children is anyones guess

we eat them

Omega has changed since i left, do you get dips with them, I do so like those spicy ones

well, time you get back then... you will love the honey mustard dip...

SHHH!!!! Only tag-carrying members of Omega can know about the honey-mustard dip ones!

I know about it, and I don't have the tag anymore.

(DDE) zeon wrote:Are you sure? For it to come from DDE it seems like it would be a bit more spammy =)



Always out of respect my Lord.

yeah those darn Omegan always leave the good part out

Hensenshi wrote:

[BERSERKER] wrote:To comment...

I think that the oath is somewhat dramatic but I guess it gets the point across.

I would like to say that Coalition of Independent Alliances is a really silly name i would like to know who though of it. (Coalition of Paragons aint much better fellas! )

Oh well viva la "CIA" vs CoP war may the side that doesn't lose win !

And the Grand Alliance was any better?

Hey now! Stop giving things I partook in the creation of a bad name! GA v1.0 wasn't all that bad, we didn't randomly go to war, infact we were declared war upon by FRA and fremen's Grand Alliance and Flavars "The Resistance"

So stop giving v1.0 a bad name It was v2.0 and after that was conisdered the most evil one's

too much spam lol but honey and mustard just sounds wrong

!Encore wrote:too much spam lol but honey and mustard just sounds wrong

it's only wrong if you don't try it!

I hereby pledge my and BWP's allegiance to CIA.

Oh and btw: I love Honey Mustard sauce on my wings!

Cheers,
Bamse - BWP 3rd in Command

lemon pepper hmmmmmmm wings

Taxonomist3 wrote:

R3B3L wrote::?

Dude, is that necessary?

I could have said it in there thread, but I decided to at least be polite enough to make a thread to comment on their crap...

this is actually an attempt at comically pointing out that they were never "ruled" by anyone accept their own inactiviness, and yet they feel the necessity to keep blaming us for all their/your inadequacies ingame

I think the expression ruled here would mean...you had a policy that was quite alternative and not nearly as like that unwritten SGW policy which was wipped along with the late GA or better to say COP.

That new policy of yours was in a crossfire with the policy of other alliances...and after few wars they learned they better change their policy...which was before considered to be peaceful and normal one..but simple naq strikes were of the chart also...so having a policy in which you dont believe and because of the COP (as it means the COP would wipe you out if you wouldnt have it) basically means they were rulled by you...in a metaphore of course...

It is nth wrong with it that is my opinion...you had the power and therefor the "right" to impose it...but the result of it is here today...and since everybody likes this war so much there isnt a problem really..you are infact happy this is happening and as it seems like CIA is also happy...so we are both happy...but perhaps to understand what happened that all this events take their place...read above...

It was your policy nth more...

And as you like what is happening...I think I must say that the policy by my opinion was a really good move

Im not gonna read the thread, its pointless and im near possitive you knew what was meant and yet played the idiot/ignorance card to make this thread and slander ours.

By "forcing us to thier rule" we do not mean that if our army size is small, or if the alliance isnt ranked 1 or 1st page, or if our incomes or stats arent as good as yours that its your fault. we mean, that no one can attack a CoP member, without having that members entire alliance Jump on them and/or thier alliance, and if any retaliation to that is made all 6 alliances jump in and some stupid reason for ALL of them to be needed is made.

NOT lack of army or stats or rank or whatever the hell your thinking.

I will only say one thing. CIA practicise same rule the CoP do.

They're merely jealous it is not working for them as good as for CoP.