Page 4 of 11
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:42 pm
by timistar
Hensenshi wrote:311 [TA] wrote:and is it okay to just put *modded* when u want to say a bad word because you have been doing it alot lately?
Because he actually says the
*modded* word and it just gets caught by the word filter. See the bold?
Penegal wrote:Another quick question. What evidence do you gain of people cheating and how do you get it?
Nebulator: accused of cheating, caught cheating, banned.
Koskesh: accused of cheating, caught cheating, punished
Stoney: accused of cheating, caught cheating, punished
J1mbo: accused of cheating, caught cheating, banned.
Timistar: accused of cheating, caught cheating, suspended
General Ben: accused of cheating, caught cheating, suspended
I'm sure there's many more, those are just the ones I can remember off the top of my head. How do we get evidence? Observe. Cheaters are easily seen if you look.
You accuse us of claiming cheats in every war, but I don't remember anyone being accused of cheating during the AK war, or the Pheonix Alliance war or Bloody Sunday, or the FRA war.
what about your friend the cheater "ASP" ? no dont mentiom him , he is cop aka forum aka game priviledged ... come on , rename that gate wars forums to cop forums it would look better wouldnt it
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:44 pm
by timistar
Nox wrote:Hensenshi wrote:
Nebulator: accused of cheating, caught cheating, banned.
Koskesh: accused of cheating, caught cheating, punished
Stoney: accused of cheating, caught cheating, punished
J1mbo: accused of cheating, caught cheating, banned.
Timistar: accused of cheating, caught cheating, suspended
General Ben: accused of cheating, caught cheating, suspended
I'm sure there's many more, those are just the ones I can remember off the top of my head. How do we get evidence? Observe. Cheaters are easily seen if you look.
You accuse us of claiming cheats in every war, but I don't remember anyone being accused of cheating during the AK war, or the Pheonix Alliance war or Bloody Sunday, or the FRA war.
General Ben: accused of cheating, suspended, proven wrong, unsuspended
CrimsonFrost (OmegaPlayer): caught cheating, slap on the rist
right after nebulator got deleted, remember that sahib
about the ta being ur b*****, lol, we surrendered in the GA war yes, because we were not in 1:1 war, after cfe surrendered and disbanded, we were alone agaisnt the entire GA
the next war was with Alpha, not omega, someone might even remember the name of that war (Land of Oz, thats where they were then, and it seems u too now sahib)
and now this war, we couldnt war agaisnt omega 1:1, lol, try us, disband CoP and we can have a go m8
and finnaly, atleast we fight our own wars, might i remind u the 1st wave in quantum
where u payed someone to mass the ta players there, mainly me and fury, or are u gonna denie that aswell, or maybe say: "i was joking"
lol, and about metal and ben, u have been accusing them for a long time, like u did with Juan, just because they have bigger armies than u, and werent omega, nothings been proven, now juans uu's are in omega, im not even gonna talk about that, but ben and metal have been looked yet many times by admin and nothing was found
and how about talking how the caspian supply of naq was found ? and how the gamemod powers were cut down a bit after that
ps. not game related, hope u feel better m8
now now , etl has 93 mil army (: tr00 skilla ( p.s. next time buy all the mercs off the market )
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:01 pm
by evilhomer
SSG EnterTheLion wrote: Ask SALVO if they exploited or not...a member of the EPA. They tried to bribe him to keep quiet.
Salvo, a member of the EPA and for quite some time your mouthpiece to the EPA, always touting the greatness of Omega....He would also be the person who passed out his username and password freely, offering people naq or UU in exchange for banking for him when he was off, then his account got "hacked" and he lost his UU. He got them back, which was a sad thing considering Its more likely he lost his UU to someone he had banking for him, not hacked as he claimed. AND, since that is against the rules, that makes your little buddy a cheater. Chalk up another one...
Damm its slippery in here.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:27 pm
by SSG EnterTheLion
evilhomer wrote:Salvo, a member of the EPA and for quite some time your mouthpiece to the EPA, always touting the greatness of Omega....He would also be the person who passed out his username and password freely, offering people naq or UU in exchange for banking for him when he was off, then his account got "hacked" and he lost his UU. He got them back, which was a sad thing considering Its more likely he lost his UU to someone he had banking for him, not hacked as he claimed. AND, since that is against the rules, that makes our little buddy a cheater. Chalk up another one...
Damm its slippery in here.
So your denying they did this??
http://herebegames.com/StarGateWars/vie ... php?t=2761
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:40 pm
by Nox
Forum wrote:it is true. there was no 'cheating' since the game did allow this tactic.
Questionable? Yes... Illegal - technically no.
This tactic is no longer available - and this 'loophole' has been closed a couple days ago, and did not exist for long at all....
What now?
Well - the ability to gain Naq from troop untraining is gone.
There will be a limit put on race changing and the 'cost' of doing so increased.
(Vacation option as well -- one will not be able to vacation if one has attacked or sabatoged within the last 24 hours).
As always - in improving the game, sometimes there are loose ends... The end result is always (well, that is a matter of opinion, but I think most will agree....) positive, even if there is an hour, or a day, of 'cleaning up loose ends'...
thanks for your patience while we try to make a better universe Smile
admin.
and i seem to remember when miners(or was it raid) apeared in game, that during a short time, many ppl had their uu's out, milions of uu's, and others raided them for those milions, it was a bug, since the uu's should have been trained automaticaly has miners, so admin sent the uu's raided has miners to the ppl that lost them, and his response to the ppl that did the raiding and grew a lot was:
"The quickness favours the bold" or something like that,
so again quoting admin i say:
"Questionable? Yes... Illegal - technically no."
and what about ur friend omegan Crimson?? that used the test server to get spy lvls and tons of naq in main server?? yes he was caught, some spy lvls taken away some uu's aswell, didnt that deserved a more harshed penalty?? what about the ppl that never cheated and got massed by him while he had such a powerfull account made from cheating, like me, remember, u asked him to mass me, cause i took tons of naq from u??
i think u have a selective memory m8, u remember ur enemies cheats but not ur friends
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:51 pm
by SSG EnterTheLion
Nox wrote:Forum wrote:it is true. there was no 'cheating' since the game did allow this tactic.
Questionable? Yes... Illegal - technically no.
This tactic is no longer available - and this 'loophole' has been closed a couple days ago, and did not exist for long at all....
What now?
Well - the ability to gain Naq from troop untraining is gone.
There will be a limit put on race changing and the 'cost' of doing so increased.
(Vacation option as well -- one will not be able to vacation if one has attacked or sabatoged within the last 24 hours).
As always - in improving the game, sometimes there are loose ends... The end result is always (well, that is a matter of opinion, but I think most will agree....) positive, even if there is an hour, or a day, of 'cleaning up loose ends'...
thanks for your patience while we try to make a better universe Smile
admin.
and i seem to remember when miners(or was it raid) apeared in game, that during a short time, many ppl had their uu's out, milions of uu's, and others raided them for those milions, it was a bug, since the uu's should have been trained automaticaly has miners, so admin sent the uu's raided has miners to the ppl that lost them, and his response to the ppl that did the raiding and grew a lot was:
"The quickness favours the bold" or something like that,
so again quoting admin i say:
"Questionable? Yes... Illegal - technically no."
and what about ur friend omegan Crimson?? that used the test server to get spy lvls and tons of naq in main server?? yes he was caught, some spy lvls taken away some uu's aswell, didnt that deserved a more harshed penalty?? what about the ppl that never cheated and got massed by him while he had such a powerfull account made from cheating, like me, remember, u asked him to mass me, cause i took tons of naq from u??
i think u have a selective memory m8, u remember ur enemies cheats but not ur friends
first of all crimson bought the naq..which he willingly gave up when I asked him to. So yes there's a HUGE difference.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:57 pm
by evilhomer
Actually, I dont have to deny they did it. As a matter of fact, I was told later by BrotherCrit that it was done. Now, before you go screaming cheaters, Let me remind you, using the same thread you pointed to now, of this:
Forum wrote:t is true. there was no 'cheating' since the game did allow this tactic.
So, having Forums input on that one, its a dead issue.
Maybe you should wait till your not on meds anymore to post here...cause this is too easy.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:59 pm
by Nox
bought the naq??
with what? stuff he got from the test server???
he was caught ofc he "willingly gave up" the stuff lol
yes i agree there is a huge diference between someone that was caught cheating and someone that by admins own words did not cheated since the game did allow this tactic.
im not here to defend them, they used those tactics thats their problem, im just quite admired that someone that is so agaisnt cheating is in fact protecting one
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:12 pm
by S T I
[/quote]
So, having Forums input on that one, its a dead issue.
Maybe you should wait till your not on meds anymore to post here...cause this is too easy.[/quote]
I just pop on to have a quick read & see this,
SHAME ON YOU
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:33 pm
by evilhomer
S T I wrote:SHAME ON YOU
Meh, so shame on me. I'm honest about things, so sue me.
And for the record, as stated before, if ETL is on pain meds, (which DO impair your ability to function properly) then as I said, perhaps he should refrain from posting until such time as he is no longer on them.
And its still easy.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:48 pm
by S T I
evilhomer wrote:S T I wrote:SHAME ON YOU
Meh, so shame on me. I'm honest about things, so sue me.
And for the record, as stated before, if ETL is on pain meds, (which DO impair your ability to function properly) then as I said, perhaps he should refrain from posting until such time as he is no longer on them.
And its still easy.
what has honesty got to do with what you said, there are rules about picking on people speach/spelling for good reasons, there have been other players on here who have been very ill & been on meds as have othersfor other reasons, so i think this is even worse.
just because you were having a discussion with some one about a subject does not give you the right to try to put them down by bringing up about them being on Meds.
quote Evilhomer
Meh, so shame on me. I'm honest about things, so sue me.
why would i want to sue you, what is this meant to mean
?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:52 pm
by Tok`ra
S T I wrote:evilhomer wrote:S T I wrote:SHAME ON YOU
Meh, so shame on me. I'm honest about things, so sue me.
And for the record, as stated before, if ETL is on pain meds, (which DO impair your ability to function properly) then as I said, perhaps he should refrain from posting until such time as he is no longer on them.
And its still easy.
what has honesty got to do with what you said, there are rules about picking on people speach/spelling for good reasons, there have been other players on here who have been very ill & been on meds as have others, so i thik this is even worse.
just because you were having a discussion with some one about a subject does not give you the right to try to put them down by bring up about them being on Meds.
quote Evilhomer
Meh, so shame on me. I'm honest about things, so sue me.why would i want to sue you, what is this meant to mean
?
When youre honest people from all sides flame you.
Get used to it.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:56 pm
by Angnoch
I think EtLs original post was very well said despite the b****** comment which he tried to rectfiy and trying to bash him for things like him being on meds for a medical issue is just plain wrong.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:00 pm
by Tok`ra
The problem is that due to this war some people on BOTH sides are unable to pull their heads out of their backsides and look at a post in any other manner than 'ohh, enemy, bash, flame'
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:04 pm
by Boooby
The discussion/debate was getting good actually, its like a history lesson
