Page 4 of 4

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:21 pm
by stefanos
Forum wrote:REPOST since a lot apparantly did not see it (and edited to the basics..to see original look on page 2 of this thread):

have people convinced me it should be a bit harder each time to reascend? yes.

what is the method:
same Glory and Rep needed;
higher UP needed.
***increased UT/trained/Naq ratio with each reascension***

is that on top of the higher up or because of it

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 2:51 am
by chunkysoup
drastic suggestion but i think it needs to be considered - do away with troop transfers just like in quantum

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:01 am
by chunkysoup
or hey, while we're beating this topic to death, here's another idea - the sooner you want to reascend, the more it costs - ie, if you try to reascend in 3 weeks, you need 3k up and 150k troops left behind, 4 weeks is 2.5k up and 125k troops, etc

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:24 pm
by fremen
Forum wrote:i believe it was the huge accounts in the first place that caused some imbalance. and that imbalance could nto be stopped in one ascension....for reasons mentioned above (and no real way to stop transfer/transfer back).

can/should a large main account remain as large after reascension? no...
Does the 1000UP / 25k UT / 10k Trained / 250Mil Naq minimums (at 1000UP) help? I believe, yes, they do, as honestly - how many times can people expend that and still have ability to climb in 2weeks to top 100??

have people convinced me it should be a bit harder each time to reascend? yes.

what is the method: same Glory and Rep needed; higher UP needed.
increased UT/trained/Naq ratio with each reascension....

I believe this will keep it so that one cannot reascend 5x with 'one account worth' of goods....

now get ready for the onslaught of counter-opinions :) ....... ;)


I would like to suggest increasing the UP requirement to reascend to 2000, then three thousand for the third go around, then four thousand for the fourth attempt. The investment and troop requirement based on UP would slow down the ability of people to ascend four times in three months. How many incarnates do we need?

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 6:47 pm
by XIZOR
fremen wrote:
Forum wrote:i believe it was the huge accounts in the first place that caused some imbalance. and that imbalance could nto be stopped in one ascension....for reasons mentioned above (and no real way to stop transfer/transfer back).

can/should a large main account remain as large after reascension? no...
Does the 1000UP / 25k UT / 10k Trained / 250Mil Naq minimums (at 1000UP) help? I believe, yes, they do, as honestly - how many times can people expend that and still have ability to climb in 2weeks to top 100??

have people convinced me it should be a bit harder each time to reascend? yes.

what is the method: same Glory and Rep needed; higher UP needed.
increased UT/trained/Naq ratio with each reascension....

I believe this will keep it so that one cannot reascend 5x with 'one account worth' of goods....

now get ready for the onslaught of counter-opinions :) ....... ;)


I would like to suggest increasing the UP requirement to reascend to 2000, then three thousand for the third go around, then four thousand for the fourth attempt. The investment and troop requirement based on UP would slow down the ability of people to ascend four times in three months. How many incarnates do we need?


here here

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:45 pm
by Elemental_FIRE
I think that there is someone who is working on their fourth ascension right now.

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:27 pm
by agapooka
Umm... and there are soem people that ahve already ascended 5 times, at least one. JUAN.

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 4:24 pm
by Weiland
Lol

Say One Juan out loud.

now say tu-tu.

Sorry, bad humour sense of...