Page 4 of 5

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 10:00 am
by TheRook
right I have spoken to zesh and this has been dealt with niether side will pay reparations...

but we hopefully have walked away without too much ill will on either side :)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 10:06 am
by madcat
ARC_trooper wrote:wooo.. new bullies :P

ps: it was around the 2-300k UU, you said its not much? why dont you give anything then? if its "not much" anyway


its the principle of the matter :P

if u asked us to pay 1 uu to not get the whole of TL/TC massed ......... we wouldnt pay 8) we'd just hurt u a LOT more than u hurt us :wink:

i havent spoken to Jack about the massing yet, but in all honesty ... i dont see the problem. he was being farmed, so he reacted!

as for being bullies?!? lol any alliance worth their salt generally has the same/very similar policy :P

EDIT: Glad all is sorted now :-D

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 10:06 am
by SVaRuN
It seems actions will need to be taken against some others too since they are abusing our good will to avoid incidents

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 11:53 am
by Nightmare
we tried sorting this out diplomatically, but the only thing that happened is it turned in to a spamfest with 5 random WoB members moaning that scavenging doesn't deserve a massing and majorly annoying me .

Lord Jack was involved in the Cia vs Cop war. When he came out the wob member began farming him every few turns...Scavenging.

Scavenging = Mass

I think most people will agree on that :P

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 12:04 pm
by ARC_trooper
damn.. dont get into that again!!

i think i was the only one who had fun in that convo :P all of you were annoyed :roll:

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 12:39 pm
by Atticus
Since the other thread was (rightly) locked and I actually had something on topic to post . . . I'll post it here!
I'm interested in knowing wether TL classify the following logs as farming or a massable offence in accordance with their 2 strike rule:
May 23, 2007 F1deK Attack defended 15 15171 9584 **,949,688,198 **,804,879,750 details
May 23, 2007 F1deK Attack defended 15 16087 11065 **,065,671,935 **,427,770,044 details
May 23, 2007 F1deK 728,829,810 Naquadah stolen 1 747 1238 **,730,391,000 **,687,703,436 details

The TL player got blessing on his 1 turn test attack.

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 12:45 pm
by Raven
Atticus wrote:Since the other thread was (rightly) locked and I actually had something on topic to post . . . I'll post it here!
I'm interested in knowing wether TL classify the following logs as farming or a massable offence in accordance with their 2 strike rule:
May 23, 2007 F1deK Attack defended 15 15171 9584 **,949,688,198 **,804,879,750 details
May 23, 2007 F1deK Attack defended 15 16087 11065 **,065,671,935 **,427,770,044 details
May 23, 2007 F1deK 728,829,810 Naquadah stolen 1 747 1238 **,730,391,000 **,687,703,436 details

The TL player got blessing on his 1 turn test attack.



if you have a problem go to extremer or Svarun theres no need to go on ranting here.....

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 12:49 pm
by Atticus
Umm . . . Sorry I believe I posted this enquiry in a polite manner . . . i have no qualms over the attack at all, hell he didnt even get my naq, I was just interested on TL's standpoint on issues such as this.
Think of it as an oppertunity to clarify the issue to the SGW public or simply a confused Atticus :-)

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 12:50 pm
by Giovanni
SVaRuN wrote:It seems actions will need to be taken against some others too since they are abusing our good will to avoid incidents


huh ???

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 12:50 pm
by Hansbrough
I believe they're saying if it happens that ascended blessing kicks in, then it's exempt from their rules :p

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 12:53 pm
by ~Phoenix~
So attacking a lot of times then when their defense is weak you take their naq is alright? You guys really need to explain your policy more or revise it if you think people are going to take that.

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 12:56 pm
by Raven
ok let me rephrase it then farm anyone of us and expect to be massed regardless of what alliance tag your wearing.....

If someone is farming you we wont team up with the guy you can fight it 1-1

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 12:57 pm
by ~Phoenix~
Raven wrote:ok let me rephrase it then farm anyone of us and expect to be massed regardless of what alliance tag your wearing.....

If someone is farming you we wont team up with the guy you can fight it 1-1


So if he farms the whole alliance by himself its an alliance on 1 then? Nice.

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 12:58 pm
by Atticus
Raven wrote:ok let me rephrase it then farm anyone of us and expect to be massed regardless of what alliance tag your wearing.....

If someone is farming you we wont team up with the guy you can fight it 1-1


Thankyou for the clarification

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 1:18 pm
by Raven
~Phoenix~ wrote:
Raven wrote:ok let me rephrase it then farm anyone of us and expect to be massed regardless of what alliance tag your wearing.....

If someone is farming you we wont team up with the guy you can fight it 1-1


So if he farms the whole alliance by himself its an alliance on 1 then? Nice.


technically yes but most good people have good defences to big to get farmed anyway and so have alot of TL members .....
The exeptions is if people start farming with 350bill strikes to get to naq defended by a 600bill def.......thats not farming anymore and it will be considered an act of war