Alliance Attack logs

[Zeratul]

ok, most, if not all agree that outgoing should be limited to leaders, so no need to say that anymore...

[Ston]

the way it is now is just lovely. well done admin!

[Ero`Sore]

looks like you guys are in the wrong alliance..
i trust my alliance with my list, i don't worry for a second that they would steal it

lol, as you must have raided the whole server by now I guess it wouldn´t be a problem..


I also think the functionality is GREAT but as we have limited covert turns for a reason, it should be limited to AL and 2iC only.

Incoming attacks could be visible to all though.

what can I say? I have the best list ingame.. everyone pages 30-2000

[Zeratul]

nice one... noone steals your entire list.... would take too much time to steal it...

[Roboute Guilliman]

ok, most, if not all agree that outgoing should be limited to leaders, so no need to say that anymore...

I tried to plead our case in admin chat, no one really backing me up except you Zeratul, and like 3-4 people saying to keep it the way it is ,so looks like it will continue to stay like it is now.

<URZA> admin alliance attack logs, allow only alliance commanders and 2IC see who we atack, but still allow all members of alliance to see who attacked members
<Zeratul> yes, that is wanted by many, many people
<GeorgeBush> Alliance logs are fine
<GeorgeBush> no need to change alliance logs other then adding what was lost or gain
<adminHere> URZA - really??
<adminHere> ok - so it works like i thought it should -- alliance members can see attack by, and on --yes?
<LordMato> its ok the way it is
<adminHere> good enough for me
<Ferra> its perfect the way it is

[Lord Silent Bob]

Nice to see the masses were heard

[Forum]

if everything was final once released, everyone would miss out on the beggining, and middle

this is a good framework. will see where it goes...

weather changes. people change. and - here - the universe changes,too

[loce]

somehow i already see guys leaving and rejoining alliance for couple of days just to raid... i wouldnt blame them

[Brdavs]

Well this may prevent a few arguments on GC as to who started what... We`ll see...

It will help alliances to better "take care of their own" when you think about it... and you whiners can only think of your own preciouss raid/farm lists... tisc tisc tisc... if a guys leaves an alliance to raid and then rejoins to keep it a secret form his m8, and you cant blame him, you both need to be booted to the curve... Nice way for all selfrespecting alliances to weed out those who are there only for their own benefit...

Despite that I dont see any notable practicall value of it tbh... Sure, it has the potential to make random mass generators obsolete and it makes for an interesting read for voayers but... meh... I would have thought certain other things would take precedans... but who knows what the allmighty forum has in store n the long run and how this ties into the big picture...

[loce]

somehow i get the feeling you're not a raider...

[Hansbrough]

as people have said before, if you don't trust your alliance, then leave.

furthermore, the only tweak I'd like to see, perhaps, just making this log available if alliance war is declared.

[CDRrules]

Someone should make a poll. Available to everybody, or just leader?

[Zeratul]

for now, admin has said he wont change it... he wont change it for at least 1 month...

[da31fox]

Well like most things it has it good points and bad.

I like that you can see if someone is getting massed and is proof to whole alliance if someone is hitting you regularly.
I dont like that it shows everyones attacks on others for everyday farming and raiding. I think that part should only be on when the alliance declares war, then the war stats would be more clear, and everyone can see who participated, and if they followed any rules of engagement.

[GeneralChaos]

Its a good idea, but can you remove the raiding part, it takes forever to load all them raid targets, maybe raids against the alliance, hits against, and hit/sab done by, would this not keep the log smaller?