Page 4 of 7
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:30 pm
by Hensenshi
Raven wrote:on another note as long as Couzens is TL and we dont have a NAP we will retaliate in main for every attack you do in ascension.....the Nap protects both of us in both servers not one way.....so i really doubt if you would wanna attack him even if we didnt have a NaP unless you think an all-out war is a good option for getting some DMU
We have a NAP to ward off potential war between our alliances as neither alliance would come out with a positive outcome. But the sword has two sides. if you can complain about how much DMU we leave out, we can complain about how much DMU you leave out.
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:43 pm
by Antius
Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Dark Bahamut wrote:lol jenny i meant you wudnt have the heart to not that you wudnt have the resources
I would have the heart to do it if i have to. Alliance comes first. Just look at Gordash... he was my very first friend in this game, hell he even bought me SS for his own UU (when you could buy full SS with ingame resources) and now? I am at war with him because he stepped the line while hitting my alliance mates.
Teal'auc
So you backstabbed your friend, possably your best and most loyal friend in this game? This is how I read this.
chosen one wrote:1 naq hit= massing=childish
that goes for ALL aliences
not ok in my book
just my 2 cents
I find this amusing seeing that you are in the DDE empire... where 1 AT attack is good enough for alliance wars, if you guys are bored enough.
Hensenshi wrote:Raven wrote:on another note as long as Couzens is TL and we dont have a NAP we will retaliate in main for every attack you do in ascension.....the Nap protects both of us in both servers not one way.....so i really doubt if you would wanna attack him even if we didnt have a NaP unless you think an all-out war is a good option for getting some DMU
We have a NAP to ward off potential war between our alliances as neither alliance would come out with a positive outcome. But the sword has two sides. if you can complain about how much DMU we leave out, we can complain about how much DMU you leave out.
Or we could just stop complaining... All of us
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:17 pm
by Curumo
Antius wrote:chosen one wrote:1 naq hit= massing=childish
that goes for ALL aliences
not ok in my book
just my 2 cents
I find this amusing seeing that you are in the DDE empire... where 1 AT attack is good enough for alliance wars, if you guys are bored enough.
Not true ... Not always that is
Antius wrote:Hensenshi wrote:Raven wrote:on another note as long as Couzens is TL and we dont have a NAP we will retaliate in main for every attack you do in ascension.....the Nap protects both of us in both servers not one way.....so i really doubt if you would wanna attack him even if we didnt have a NaP unless you think an all-out war is a good option for getting some DMU
We have a NAP to ward off potential war between our alliances as neither alliance would come out with a positive outcome. But the sword has two sides. if you can complain about how much DMU we leave out, we can complain about how much DMU you leave out.
Or we could just stop complaining... All of us
I completely agree ...
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:29 pm
by Teal'auc of the Void
Antius wrote:So you backstabbed your friend, possably your best and most loyal friend in this game? This is how I read this.
No. If he would consider me as friend, he'd hear up my friendly notice to leave my alliance mates alone. And notice it was him who massed me first. So who backstabbed who.
Teal'auc
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:31 pm
by Dark Bahamut
lol i only wanted to know wat everyones policies are
and btw REK has become quite the little diplomat lol
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:51 pm
by Teal'auc of the Void
Dark Bahamut wrote:lol i only wanted to know wat everyones policies are
and btw REK has become quite the little diplomat lol
Teal'auc
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:14 pm
by __The General__
i dont like people hideing behind there big friends or there alliances, if you dont have the deff but you have a high income you will be att, and when you send a message to the person who att you,it shouldnt say my alliance is going to mass you or i will get my friend rank 5 to mass you, what it should say is if you dont give back my naq i WILL mass you, thats if someone really needed the naq.
if you send the message saying my allaince is going to mass you or friend, it just shows how much of a coward you are and it all so shows you are yousing your alliance as a lever to get out off things and to get what you want.it means you cant hold your own and your just a noob.
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:11 pm
by Bull-E
Dark Ifrit wrote:i dont like people hideing behind there big friends or there alliances, if you dont have the deff but you have a high income you will be att, and when you send a message to the person who att you,it shouldnt say my alliance is going to mass you or i will get my friend rank 5 to mass you, what it should say is if you dont give back my naq i WILL mass you, thats if someone really needed the naq.
if you send the message saying my allaince is going to mass you or friend, it just shows how much of a coward you are and it all so shows you are yousing your alliance as a lever to get out off things and to get what you want.it means you cant hold your own and your just a noob.
agreed
Antius wrote:chosen one wrote:1 naq hit= massing=childish
that goes for ALL aliences
not ok in my book
just my 2 cents
I find this amusing seeing that you are in the DDE empire... where 1 AT attack is good enough for alliance wars, if you guys are bored enough.
we go to war to train the new comers to the empire, including myself
i woulnt get mad at a 1at probe
unless u do it more then 2X a day
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:00 am
by REK
Dark Bahamut wrote:lol i only wanted to know wat everyones policies are
and btw REK has become quite the little diplomat lol
Yes .. tis true
only a half massing now as a warning ^^
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:01 am
by Teal'auc of the Void
REK wrote:Dark Bahamut wrote:lol i only wanted to know wat everyones policies are
and btw REK has become quite the little diplomat lol
Yes .. tis true
only a half massing now as a warning ^^
What's half massing?
Teal'auc
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:23 am
by REK
they dont get raidied.. I know im too kind ^^
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:31 am
by Dark Bahamut
thats wat i meant by him going soft lol
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:19 am
by Envy
fool me once shame on me (NAQ hit)
fool me twice shame on u (Farming) + (Warning)
fool me again bounce on u (Massing)
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:34 am
by buck
REK wrote:Dark Bahamut wrote:lol i only wanted to know wat everyones policies are
and btw REK has become quite the little diplomat lol
Yes .. tis true
only a half massing now as a warning ^^
You are dead to me rek...
Re: alliance farming policies
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:37 am
by JediMasterX
I'll just got ahead and tell you naq hits alone along with raiding will most likely result in a massing on any DDE/DXM/DOC members.