StarGateWars Forums

Mathlord wrote:Hey ETL? How's the permaban going for you?

Come to think of it, how did that 1-week oh wait, should I say 4 day ban go for you?

And excuse this TA member for trying to speak the truth...I guess it's not the apropos thing to do these days.

You speak from ignorance..as always!! You sadly can't seem to comprehend that there are some things beyond ingame enmities. Perhaps I need to educate you..here's a little taste..

I was warned TWICE for one phrase, "the supposed mod should have used her brains and just called jake her nemesis, instead of getting personal with calling him a jerk." Now apparently that is now abuse.. and referring to the fault of the mod is considered disrespect to the mods. I won't even go into the implication of FS calling me a liar about the 4th MT.

And the reason why my perma ban was removed b/c admin knows very well it was illegal...apparently I was supposed to have changed the settings of the forum, when admin knows for a fact I didn't.

It's amusing as hell u lot desperately defending someone who thinks of the TA with scorn. lmao

I understand where you're coming from Jake, but if you look at the posts and the rule of "defying the mods" he breaks that rule a number of times before being banned. Whether you agree or disagree with the rule, that's one thing, but it's still a rule. If you don't like it, work to change it, don't just act all shocked and outraged when it's actually used against someone you like for a change.

RepliJake wrote:

My point was, Rhett was warned for abusive language and insulting a mod for the same thing.

Along with various other rule breeches and was banned accordingly.

Trife wrote:

RepliJake wrote:

Trife wrote:Almost38 and the other people in the 'complainer' camp: With any luck you guys will get over this sometime.

If not, the use of this forum isn't mandatory/required, feel free to leave if you're this unhappy with this situation.

Geesh, get over it already.

And you aren't required to read this.

You aren't required to cry like a 9 year old girl over the moderation of an online forum, either.

Luckily I don't.

RepliJake wrote:

Trife wrote:

RepliJake wrote:

Trife wrote:Almost38 and the other people in the 'complainer' camp: With any luck you guys will get over this sometime.

If not, the use of this forum isn't mandatory/required, feel free to leave if you're this unhappy with this situation.

Geesh, get over it already.

And you aren't required to read this.

You aren't required to cry like a 9 year old girl over the moderation of an online forum, either.

Luckily I don't.

If it sounds like a 9 year old girl crying, if it looks like a 9 year old girl crying, it's probably a 9 year old girl crying. I call 'em as I see em, champ.

Shaitan wrote:
You speak from ignorance..as always!! You sadly can't seem to comprehend that there are some things beyond ingame enmities. Perhaps I need to educate you..here's a little taste..

I was warned TWICE for one phrase, "the supposed mod should have used her brains and just called jake her nemesis, instead of getting personal with calling him a jerk." Now apparently that is now abuse.. and referring to the fault of the mod is considered disrespect to the mods. I won't even go into the implication of FS calling me a liar about the 4th MT.

And the reason why my perma ban was removed b/c admin knows very well it was illegal...apparently I was supposed to have changed the settings of the forum, when admin knows for a fact I didn't.

It's amusing as hell u lot desperately defending someone who thinks of the TA with scorn. lmao

Well excuse me for not keeping up with the hourly moodswings of admin and your friendship with him...

Look, I'm not here to argue with either you or Jake, I'm just defending the just actions of Freespirit who actually had the courage to do the right thing.

right thing he banned etl to cover up the mods were getting another market turn

Almost38 wrote:right thing he banned etl to cover up the mods were getting another market turn

lol, banning etl wasnt gonna cover up squat. But do go on.

Vendetta wrote:

Almost38 wrote:right thing he banned etl to cover up the mods were getting another market turn

lol, banning etl wasnt gonna cover up squat. But do go on.

QFT, Because there are obviously no other way to comunicate other than the forum.

Almost38 wrote:right thing he banned etl to cover up the mods were getting another market turn

OH NOEEEEEEEEEEES!!!!2111!!!!

EVERYBODY PANIC!!!!!!

WAT IS WE SUPPOSED 2 DO?!?!!!!

Almost38 wrote:right thing he banned etl to cover up the mods were getting another market turn

lol ETL was breaking the rules...plain and simple. Whatever the motivation, he was.

And now that I've said this ten times, allow me to say it again...have a problem with the rules, work to change them, don't just break them.

he broke a rule stating not to falsify a game update which he didnt and fs lied and said he did

Almost38 wrote:he broke a rule stating not to falsify a game update which he didnt and fs lied and said he did

walk on fanboi and learn to read.

^--- Tru Storie!

~Neph

Almost38 wrote:he broke a rule stating not to falsify a game update which he didnt and fs lied and said he did

Falsifying game updates is a rules violation. However, also are defying mods, using abusive language and a good five other violations.

viewtopic.php?f=101&t=89529

Read Freespirits post...

but he said mods get a 4mt which they did and fs said nothe mods dont when he knew they did so he said etl falsified a game update which he didnt