Page 4 of 4
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:18 pm
by GAME0VER
if its standing i attack it,if its moving i attack it,then again im in attack mode 24/7
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:18 pm
by cyberblade
I'd have to say that hitting officer's isn't a dirty tactic-but its a different level of warfare...
With regards to the "hit and run" tactics-they may not be dirty, but they sure are cowardly... (I would know, we were declared war on-hit for 2 hours then the other alliance went on PPT, they jumped off today, 4 days later, started hitting again but when I started to hit back they all went on PPT again...) It's viable, and if you were hit first I would even say its fine... But there should be a rule that if you declare war on someone you can't run away when they try to fight back...
</soapbox>
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 5:03 pm
by Shornaal
Everything and everyone is fair game.
I wouldn't do cross server but i dont play any other servers......
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:00 pm
by deathguard
the only dirty tactic ican think of is stealing a planet seconds befor war ends and if there is a nap agred starts and you are unable to get the planet back but he thats just my opinion
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:38 pm
by Shornaal
deathguard wrote:the only dirty tactic ican think of is stealing a planet seconds befor war ends and if there is a nap agred starts and you are unable to get the planet back but he thats just my opinion
Thats not dirty. Thats funny
Ishtar66 wrote:for me personally dirty tactics are:
cheating, multi-ing.
going back on ones word once it is given
backstabbing
I agree completely.
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:42 am
by deathguard
God shornaal wrote:deathguard wrote:the only dirty tactic ican think of is stealing a planet seconds befor war ends and if there is a nap agred starts and you are unable to get the planet back but he thats just my opinion
Thats not dirty. Thats funny
it is incredibly anoying
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:19 am
by Reaperman
In a game of war the only dirty tactic is breaking the rules or breaking your word... and taking fights to non related servers.
-Officer hits are legit as officers support their CO with UU
-Planet stealing is legit as they support your enemy
-Involving others is legit as whats the point of having allies if your not going to use them.
-descension has to be legit as you can remove a great deal of your enemies power by descending his account. It's kinda like taking out miscile silos
-hit and run is legit particularly when facing a larger opponent with greater recourses.
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:40 am
by Shornaal
Play for the win. Do anything necisary to gain victory. Evrything is viewed as a dirty tactic if your opponant cant do it back. So ignore them and mass them and verything they hold dear.
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:11 am
by Bob_2007
cyberblade wrote:I'd have to say that hitting officer's isn't a dirty tactic-but its a different level of warfare...
With regards to the "hit and run" tactics-they may not be dirty, but they sure are cowardly... (I would know, we were declared war on-hit for 2 hours then the other alliance went on PPT, they jumped off today, 4 days later, started hitting again but when I started to hit back they all went on PPT again...) It's viable, and if you were hit first I would even say its fine... But there should be a rule that if you declare war on someone you can't run away when they try to fight back...
</soapbox>
PPT is an abomination that should be taken out and shot.
By all means keep ppt. God knows even I use it when I want a couple days peace and quiet without worrying about naq building up, or if I'm going away for the weekend...
BUT. PPT should only be usable if you haven't attacked anyone in the last 48 hours. Period. You guys call this a WAR game and cower like stinking rats behind the ppt after you strike, are the lowest scum in the game. Get in wars or stay out. The choice is yours. But once you're in, you're in until it's over. That'd knock all this crap about wars being unwinnable on the head once and for all.
Did I mention you hit a sore point, bringing up the ppt issue?
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:13 am
by buck
Hit em hard, hit em fast, Hit em first, Hit em where it hurts, if that means throwing some mud in there eyes, then so be it, So no mercy to them, there officers or alliance, Unless they first proove they are worthy of such mercy.
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:38 am
by Teal'auc of the Void
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:40 pm
by Bob_2007
PPT
Re: What in your opinion is 'Dirty Tactics' in a war
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:17 pm
by Legendary Apophis
