StarGateWars Forums

bebita wrote:one thing will never understand tle with svarun in front
we don't need your game view
not everything means to stay in front of pc and banking because svarun say so or blahh or zesh
i have a def because i want to protect my income not because for rank
blahh and tle show that a defence can't protect income
and if i have rank 1 def they come to mass it and inventing reason for wars (zion war)
so escuse me svarun
u suck in gameplay

So you're now upset that your defense wasn't big enough to protect your income? Oh you poor baby.

Thanks to planets and motherships, farming can be very cheap. Tough.

Also lol at inventing reasons for war. Tekki really does have all of you so nicely trained doesn't she?

Mathlord wrote:

bebita wrote:one thing will never understand tle with svarun in front
we don't need your game view
not everything means to stay in front of pc and banking because svarun say so or blahh or zesh
i have a def because i want to protect my income not because for rank
blahh and tle show that a defence can't protect income
and if i have rank 1 def they come to mass it and inventing reason for wars (zion war)
so escuse me svarun
u suck in gameplay

So you're now upset that your defense wasn't big enough to protect your income? Oh you poor baby.

Thanks to planets and motherships, farming can be very cheap. Tough.

Also lol at inventing reasons for war. Tekki really does have all of you so nicely trained doesn't she?

i am not crying
i am just post why i am here and why tle will be history in this game

This whole 'Christmas Ceasfire' business seems more like a case of crossed wires than anything else. I don't think either side is at fault for the fact it didn't take off.

Mordack wrote:This whole 'Christmas Ceasfire' business seems more like a case of crossed wires than anything else. I don't think either side is at fault for the fact it didn't take off.

i wouldn't trust them for a ceasifire
they will invent reasons or something else like they show in the past to break that ceasefire

hos is mine spam It plain and simple No Xmas cease fire will be granted by DDE hence Im MR Scrooge

REK wrote:hos is mine spam It plain and simple No Xmas cease fire will be granted by DDE hence Im MR Scrooge

cease fires are for sissies. If you don't want to be hit, vacation mode...so we can make fun of you

Plus doubt too many people will be on to steal your naq. And if so then so what. What makes it any more different than playing regularly.

JediMasterX wrote:

REK wrote:hos is mine spam It plain and simple No Xmas cease fire will be granted by DDE hence Im MR Scrooge

cease fires are for sissies. If you don't want to be hit, vacation mode...so we can make fun of you

Plus doubt too many people will be on to steal your naq. And if so then so what. What makes it any more different than playing regularly.

good point of view

I thought maybe I would ask a strange question or two?

1. What do you want this agme to look like when this war is over?

2. What does each alliance in this war currently want?

I dont figure it would be such a terrbile thing to ask nor answer at this point, but it may be revealing at the very least and the best maybe even helpful.

I will ask this question in the other thread as well as I am not sure completely where it belongs and I dont undersand the point of the two threads either lol

1. What do you want this agme to look like when this war is over?
More options and more wars with a better scoring system.

2. What does each alliance in this war currently want?
More Live battles and a way to score them...and more wars!!

I dont figure it would be such a terrbile thing to ask nor answer at this point, but it may be revealing at the very least and the best maybe even helpful.

Why not just join in, it isnt so bad. Its what the game is about basically. Diplomacy is needed because of the animosity bred on these uselss forums not on the actual SGW battlefield. So if players stick primarily to the battlefield..diplomacy isnt needed. Dont take my post the wrong way, Im not being sarcastic or attempting to be funny. I respect you allot therefore your post deserves my honest reply.

As for the proposal of the ceasefire I can understand where the idea comes from. Ceasefire or not people will be with their familes. As the same for each year whether there is a massive war going on or not most people will ppt/vac around Christmas to be with family and friends and ppt New Years to celabrate/party with friends. Though I suggest not being around the day after due to everyone having hangovers and being grumpy

1. What do you want this agme to look like when this war is over?
I agree with Jedi~Tank and also wouldnt mind seeing a little bit more balance over all.

LOL TheWay, you already know what I want. I'd like the wars to be a little more ... decisive though. I will stay in this one for as long as it takes but something decisive would be nice for a change.

Jedi, I know what you are getting at. If people are honest ingame and respectful ingame then there is no real need for diplomacy but we need diplomats for those times when things are just misunderstood or for when battlefield diplomacy just isn't going to cut it. Sometimes, I believe that some solutions do need to be discussed - probably over MSN.

you already know what I want. I'd like the wars to be a little more ... decisive though. I will stay in this one for as long as it takes but something decisive would be nice for a change.

Thats the problem ive had with wars for quite some time now, Unless its a squashing, E.g. Omega Vs some random 3rd page alliance, Anyone with a half decent account can survive in a war indefinatly, Decisive-ness would make it all less boring...but i dont think theres any way to fix that...

...Might i suggest you all do battle in real life?

hehehe, that wouldnt work too well, there probably only 3 or 4 of us that can actually rumble.

well since I think most would agree why not just set the agreements before the war aka

The war will last 2 weeks after which time if there is no vistor each side will no where the other stands. If the war started because of over farming then the alliance that over farmed knows if they cross that line it will be war again and the alliance getting farmed may also know that the other alliance may choice for whatever reason to end up at war again.

It doesnt realy matter who wins just that each side gets the point, in the end the one who wins is the one who walks away with what they want

Forinstance if the alliance getting farmed did a good job in the war then maybe the farming alliance will realize it isnt worth the resources to farm said alliance beyond their terms. Or maybe the alliance getting farmed will see they cannot stop the farming alliance and they will try to either restaff and be stronger or just live with the afrming they get as they wont think a war is worth the cost.

I figure this is what a good war will be a statement of consequence, you do this and this is the response simple and easy.

In the end if one alliance surrenders in awar and the winning alliance takes that as a victory but in reality the losing alliance just does the same thing again as many have seen happen in this war. People have tried to do all kinds of things to stop stuff like this but in the end the important thing is the message you deliver.

I guess the message that is desired to be delivered here is who will fight the longest meaning if you attack us we will go to war with you til you submit but I havent seen what this submission will be.

If it is just we admit we lose what has either gained other then they can out last the other but because of the length and cost of this war in particular you run into the issue of if the war ends with a simple surrender wont it just start up again and be a yr war again.

If you set an end game and this is where the community would need to agree then wars can be fun and have an ending date of course thye could simply start again the next week but i would have to figure that most wouldnt want a war again so quickly, as it simply cost to much unless your opponant just lays down then it may be worth it but utterly pointless and not much fun.

You see then the point of war is the end result rather then a surrender when surrender wont happen.

I agree it is most likely to late for this in this war but you two being the largest powers in the game I figure if you in some way though this made sense it could possibly help the rest of the game to find some sense of balance to the idea of wars.

I just want some thoughts as this was just some stuff I was thinking