Page 31 of 34

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:20 am
by Baxter
GeneralChaos wrote:Ive also noticed 1 person who hit me, when i checked them they where unascended, so i figured meh it was an unlucky hit on me,

Then today i check and there suddenly a Prince of Timeless Ancient God,

Soooo yea, i think you need to remove this whole, descend yourself, to get the boost from unascended realms, get GnR and then ascend again and you go up by 1 ascension level,

Its bascially giving them a free Vac Mode in ascended without punishment.

If you descend yourself, bam you lose all your ascension levels, it was your choice to do it.

however, there have been multiple issues with accounts descending themselves, without the owners doing it
what would happen to them? admin thinks that its a 'perk'; so to speak

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:46 am
by MaxSterling
Spies lost during sabbing missions are not counted towards spies lost on ME.

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:17 am
by Travis Dane
Travis Dane wrote:..............

Also, admin, after you have gained your 1k g/r points and because you have been in 5 point range, is it possible that instead of getting this message:

"There is a 14 day rest period between ascensions. Before then you are too weak...."

Just like in that small update way back, now telling us exactly what time our ms will return, can you add in time remaining to how long before one can ascend?

Just looked and seen this ( Thnx, Jason - Woot Woot !! - U Da Man !! )

There is a 14 day rest period between ascensions. Before then you are too weak....
You estimate critical strength in 3.16 days.

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:46 pm
by speedyrossco
A member of a different alliance but in the same "house" is attacking my self and other members of the alliance Im in. Is this a " update bug ", as I have told this is not ment to be possible.

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:50 pm
by Sarevok
If the player hasn't been in the alliance for 5 days, or the alliance hasn't been in the house for 5 days, then there is no peace setting until the 5 days has elapsed.

Basically,

IF "Player in alliance longer then 5 days" AND "Alliance in house longer then 5 days" THEN "Peace setting" Otherwise "No relation change"

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:59 pm
by speedyrossco
Well Im not sure how long the player has been in the other alliance, but the alliance hes in has been leading the house for a while now. I dont want to start naming names yet but if any members of admin want to know then pm me (SS knows about this).

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:11 pm
by Sarevok
Ask the alliance leader how long they've been in there. If they say less then 5 days, that why they can.

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:25 am
by MaxSterling
speedyrossco wrote:Well Im not sure how long the player has been in the other alliance, but the alliance hes in has been leading the house for a while now. I dont want to start naming names yet but if any members of admin want to know then pm me (SS knows about this).


If the name of the House is not below their name, then they are not a member of the House yet and can hit anyone within the same House.

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:28 am
by speedyrossco
MaxSterling wrote:
speedyrossco wrote:Well Im not sure how long the player has been in the other alliance, but the alliance hes in has been leading the house for a while now. I dont want to start naming names yet but if any members of admin want to know then pm me (SS knows about this).


If the name of the House is not below their name, then they are not a member of the House yet and can hit anyone within the same House.


It is below their name. :-k

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:54 am
by MaxSterling
Was it when he made those attacks?

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:48 pm
by MaxSterling
Did some planet massing the past few days and noticed some inconsistencies in regards to number of planet defenses destroyed. Feel free to check my logs. ID 83707. I have the same fleets massing the same unplatformed planet and some hits are destroying twice as many defenses as other hits.

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:55 pm
by Sarevok
It varies dependant on fleet power. And fleet power varies within 90 and 102%.

Twice as many does seem a little extreme though.

Re: Alliance PPT BUG ?

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:51 am
by MEZZANINE
BuMp

Still no word on this problem or if it has been fixed

Re: Alliance PPT BUG ?

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 5:09 am
by Sarevok
No word yet

Re: Jun29th update BUGS

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 8:12 am
by MaxSterling
Sarevok wrote:It varies dependant on fleet power. And fleet power varies within 90 and 102%.

:roll: Duh... I think I know that...

This is bugged...

Jul 23, 21:42 x K3 conquered 15 61,836 0 194,208,000,000 179,942,760,000 details
Jul 23, 21:42 x Attack defended 15 6,608 0 198,254,000,000 199,172,040,000 details
Jul 23, 21:42 x Attack defended 15 6,338 0 190,162,000,000 215,372,160,000 details
Jul 23, 21:41 x Attack defended 15 6,069 0 182,070,000,000 218,297,700,000 details
Jul 23, 21:41 x Attack defended 15 6,675 0 200,277,000,000 257,326,440,000 details
Jul 23, 21:41 x Attack defended 15 6,271 0 188,139,000,000 258,879,720,000 details
Jul 23, 21:41 x Attack defended 15 13,756 0 206,346,000,000 288,776,070,000 details
Jul 23, 21:41 x Attack defended 15 6,203 0 186,116,000,000 291,683,880,000 details
Jul 23, 21:40 x Attack defended 15 13,620 0 204,323,000,000 302,437,590,000 details
Jul 23, 21:40 x Attack defended 15 12,542 0 188,139,000,000 353,449,500,000 details
Jul 23, 21:40 x Attack defended 15 13,350 0 200,277,000,000 370,500,000,000 details
Jul 22, 13:38 x K1 conquered 15 63,185 0 182,070,000,000 180,077,250,000 details
Jul 22, 13:38 x Attack defended 15 5,680 0 170,401,262,500 185,935,500,000 details
Jul 22, 13:38 x Attack defended 15 12,138 0 182,070,000,000 229,298,040,000 details
Jul 22, 13:38 x Attack defended 15 11,428 0 171,423,735,000 244,363,440,000 details
Jul 22, 13:38 x Attack defended 15 6,338 0 190,162,000,000 255,738,840,000 details
Jul 22, 13:35 x Attack defended 15 6,473 0 194,208,000,000 280,377,000,000 details
Jul 22, 13:34 x Attack defended 15 6,541 0 196,231,000,000 273,000,000,000 details