Page 32 of 33
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 8:32 am
by Lord Yojimbo
~Coyle~ wrote:Sad to see fs go down the nap road, things must really have changed, good luck all
NAP's NMA's and other diplomatic tools have been a great item to use to build friendships Coyle so its not the be all and end all if two parties agree to a Non Permanent Non Aggression Pact. Maybe its for the better? FS can use such diplomatic tools to build and/or further their friendships and influence
One doesn't lose their Independent Alliance Status by using such methods
Well Played to All -
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 8:38 am
by doc holliday
~Coyle~ wrote:Sad to see fs go down the nap road, things must really have changed, good luck all
Sometimes when you bite off more than you can chew you have to compromise your values to make it out alive.
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:43 am
by Scar Face
Coyle does have a point thou
It took FS and DDE 2 years to end it, while think we can say FS was the underdog there also, thou at the time FS had coyle, mezz, brothers etc crew. Still times change so totally understand the move
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:46 am
by BMMJ13
Drahazar wrote:BMMJ13 wrote:Les Ennemis wrote:Forgotten Serenity admits that the forces of the Tauri Alliance had better organization and were better prepared for war but never the less Forgotten Serenity stood still in battle trenches.
Warring parties agreed on following:
Mutual agreement on ending war
War ends on October 1st 2012 23:59 game time
NAP between TAF and FSF will follow (0 hits main and ascended)
Les Ennemis FSF 2IC
This end at 23:59 game time which will be 24 hours so there are NO immediate NAP breaches. Good fight guys.. Any problems you know who to contact.. best wishes in your endeavors..
TA accepts this ending agreement. Some good fights on both side. Good luck to everyone coming out of this war.
BMMJ13
TAF HC
Not saying i'm against this, however the only person who can agree to deals where the entire family is involved is myself, and i haven't heard back from Odin about what CS wants.
As it stands FS and FP do indeed agree to terms, tho i will need to hear back from Odin before CS can be included in this agreement.
I would assume since much of CS have since set peace to TA, that it was indeed approved by him as well and therefore still stands as what was posted?
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:56 am
by Drahazar
All i need from CS is verification, its best not to assume what CS wants. I know Odin had an agreement with a branch of the TAF family, so i cant say its likely he wont back this, i still need him to say, "yeah cool im good with that" or something and we can put this to rest.
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:31 am
by Mathlord
Well played everyone, thanks for the fun and I look forward to reforging friendly ties with FSF over the coming months.
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:41 am
by Mathlord
Les Ennemis wrote:TAF HC[/i] We agreed to that, why is Math saying now he wants a perm NAP or he will sit on the whole family? Come on man yes we did first strike but a 6 month NAP will give us time to get over this feud.. There was nothing left to diplo before.. The war needed to happen.. Now you can think you got us by the seat of our pants and that we look ignorant.. But, does that give you a right to back on on deals?? I am confused so please
me understand why the change?
Yeah I never said that...I told Drahazar last Thursday I think it was that I wanted longer than a two month NAP which was his offer at the time...that was all lol. Haven't been on msn much at all (if at all) since then. In fact I was spending the weekend at a lovely bed and breakfast in Ephrata, PA. Kromer's B&B is run by the nicest sweetest couple you will ever meet.
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:49 am
by Drahazar
Done received Clarification from CS. All sorted
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:57 am
by ~wilco~
And to think you was so sure you would never go down the NAP route
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 12:36 pm
by Jim
doc holliday wrote:~Coyle~ wrote:Sad to see fs go down the nap road, things must really have changed, good luck all
Sometimes when you bite off more than you can chew you have to compromise your values to make it out alive.
Lulz.
So how was the war? Everyone have fun?
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:13 pm
by ~Coyle~
Pretty sure if easy seen this he would have you change the name of FS, it's changed now and not the way he would have wanted.
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:21 pm
by Mathlord
~Coyle~ wrote:Pretty sure if easy seen this he would have you change the name of FS, it's changed now and not the way he would have wanted.
Sometimes people have to make decisions for the good of their alliance that aren't their ideal choice. We've all done this throughout the years, just a part of leading an alliance in stargatewars.
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:25 pm
by ~Coyle~
Scar Face wrote:Coyle does have a point thou
It took FS and DDE 2 years to end it, while think we can say FS was the underdog there also, thou at the time FS had coyle, mezz, brothers etc crew. Still times change so totally understand the move
Ah times do change I suppose, still without net, laptop or anything to play on and haven't a clue when I'll be back but personally I wont be honouring naps when I am back so probably means my leaving of FS, not that I was around much lately anyway. Good luck all
You are right math and I wish drah and the rest of the leadership best of luck
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:35 pm
by Jim
Ex-FS leadership have no right to complain that their Ex-alliance has adapted new methods to cope with the fact that their ex-leaders left them in a position of weakness!
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:56 pm
by ~Coyle~
Hmmm now thats idiocy there, I never told anyone to go ahead and mass a taf member for one hit, the no nap policy never started this war and we did fine all those years with the policy we had so think again there, easy let the FS name continue on as long as it stayed the was it was, guard what I'm allowed to go on about, its not the same alliance anymore and thats just the way it is.