StarGateWars Forums

Sarevok wrote:Yes. I did it myself, And checked what happened. I attacked someone, so they were damaged, and used the repair option. Attack weapons, only 1 strength left, but the fleets were repaired. Wasn't able to test defence, as i wasn't attacked lol

Mine were all full strength, and they all went to 1 power from what I remember. It's weird.

Yeah, i though i should attack, to make sure that it considered they needed repairs.

But now we know that whether at full strength of damaged, they go to 1 strength

I also noticed that planet building costs were cheaper compared to legocalc. Since legocalc has always been correct for me, however I have not built up planets in main, so I could not cross check that. Had anyone noticed something similar?

what stats? was it defence? cause if it was then Jason said he was reducing the cost of the upgrade

MaxSterling wrote:If there is one thing that I'd love to see... it's to remove the 2-hour PPT you get for spending $ in the in-game Black Market. I think it's overabused by some players to avoid getting massed, especially when they've already used both 2 day PPTs. What does a person need a 2-hour PPT for when purchasing ATs? We can't steal them or raid them. Naq and UU I can understand and frankly... people should be making those purchases while already on PPT.

Came up with a solution...

Goods purchased thru the in-game Black Market page are shown on the Trade Broker page as a trade with the game. The goods are given a "Recover Goods" button which will expire like any rejected broker, so they're safe from being taken until the player is ready. No PPT is necessary. Goods are safe.

Sarevok wrote:what stats? was it defence? cause if it was then Jason said he was reducing the cost of the upgrade

Planet I noticed on was my attack planet.

J may have made it a little cheaper due to doubling of attack and defence power?
Or the calc could be wrong. I noticed that the power it says is the same regardless of size, yet when you increase size, you increase facility efficiency

not sure if it's already been mentioned, though i cant atk anyone in my alliance.

i guess its something to do with them being in the same house??

That would make sense, and is probably the explanation.

any ME chasers in beta want this:

Defensive Action 104,424,418,611,000 Ranked: 5

Super Guards 256,074,815
Defending Mercenaries 72,906,541


look me up

(only thing i ask is you post your losses ect and how many turns you used, and naq used approx.
have no nox

also, im a bit unsure.

i tryed hitting my old officer (who hasent been my officer since before beta was opened)

i get this message:
Vacation is vacation. Officer are officers. Attacks are attacks. Do not mix the these ingredients...

is something stuck or something?
i set war with him aswel, but no such luck

Rottenking wrote:i get this message:
Vacation is vacation. Officer are officers. Attacks are attacks. Do not mix the these ingredients...

IMO, implies you can't hit vacationed people or your own officers

Rottenking wrote:any ME chasers in beta want this:

Defensive Action 104,424,418,611,000 Ranked: 5

Super Guards 256,074,815
Defending Mercenaries 72,906,541

Technically with the updates to ME... you might gain more ME than they do.

Sarevok wrote:

Rottenking wrote:i get this message:
Vacation is vacation. Officer are officers. Attacks are attacks. Do not mix the these ingredients...

IMO, implies you can't hit vacationed people or your own officers

yes, but he is neither, is isnt on vacation, and is not currently my officer, and not in a house.

so my question is, why do i get that message.

he WAS my officer months ago, but isnt currently

MaxSterling wrote:

Rottenking wrote:any ME chasers in beta want this:

Defensive Action 104,424,418,611,000 Ranked: 5

Super Guards 256,074,815
Defending Mercenaries 72,906,541

Technically with the updates to ME... you might gain more ME than they do.

hence why i would be interested to see the outcome

if someone is short on the turns to do it, and will seriosly mass it, i can send them some

Ah right. Can you share the ID?

Sarevok wrote:Ah right. Can you share the ID?

his ID is
id=40348


my id is id=35154