Page 33 of 33
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 2:03 pm
by Drahazar
I hate NAPs DRAs any thing that removes the sandbox element of this game, i love open freedom and the ability to do whatever i want, its fun.
I am bitter that i'm now in a 6 month NAP and there isn't anything i can do about that, Mezz and Daku before me knew that long wars pretty much kill activity, and with this game at what maybe 200 active now, im sure sure it could survive any more 2+ year wars.
Colye you forget that during the DDE war which was FS's last long war, a good 90% of those that fought in it have either left the game or have vacced indefinitely, sure i would have fought for the next 4 years or so and giving it my all, however would that have been the best option for the family.
Wars are always predictable in the fact that they always escalate, me and math agreed to keep it FS-TA but eventually it would have been FSF vs TAF, and that wouldn't have been best choice for the family at all.
I do not like NAPs i do not like DRAs, it is highly unlikely that i will bow to any such agreements in a very long time, this has been a nasty pill to swallow for me and its going to taste bitter for the next 6 months, but you do what your alliance needs you to do.
If you want to complain Coyle, try returning to FS and actually lending a hand. You have been away for so long i doubt you could even name 5 members of the current FS.
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 2:44 pm
by Lord Yojimbo
Drahazar wrote:I hate NAPs DRAs any thing that removes the sandbox element of this game, i love open freedom and the ability to do whatever i want, its fun.
I am bitter that i'm now in a 6 month NAP and there isn't anything i can do about that, Mezz and Daku before me knew that long wars pretty much kill activity, and with this game at what maybe 200 active now, im sure sure it could survive any more 2+ year wars.
Colye you forget that during the DDE war which was FS's last long war, a good 90% of those that fought in it have either left the game or have vacced indefinitely, sure i would have fought for the next 4 years or so and giving it my all, however would that have been the best option for the family.
Wars are always predictable in the fact that they always escalate, me and math agreed to keep it FS-TA but eventually it would have been FSF vs TAF, and that wouldn't have been best choice for the family at all.
I do not like NAPs i do not like DRAs, it is highly unlikely that i will bow to any such agreements in a very long time, this has been a nasty pill to swallow for me and its going to taste bitter for the next 6 months, but you do what your alliance needs you to do.
If you want to complain Coyle, try returning to FS and actually lending a hand. You have been away for so long i doubt you could even name 5 members of the current FS.
It doesnt have to be so bitter dude - this is a great chance for TAF and FS to build relations or at the very least friendships
From an independence standpoint and the war of course I can understand the bitterness of it but all the same, the gains of this NAP between FS and TAF could well out weigh the lack of one - Frienships and building bridges is also part of the game and thus diplomatic relations add to the "sandbox" in my opinion
.
It may not be an off the cuff style of play but like all alliances - you have to try to interact with other alliances in the most structured and measured way possible
This is my perspective for what it is worth
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:25 pm
by Master_Splinter
Drahazar wrote:Wars are always predictable in the fact that they always escalate, me and math agreed to keep it FS-TA but eventually it would have been FSF vs TAF, and that wouldn't have been best choice for the family at all.
This is true but I think there should be a congratulations for all involved to keep this war between the two main alliances. While there is some bitterness from both sides, I think this fact holds great hope for our two side building a strong friendship and understanding in the near future.
Master Splinter
~TAAE Leader
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:04 pm
by sarparto
War officially over, this can be locked now.
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:36 pm
by ~Les Erebus~
sarparto wrote:War officially over, this can be locked now.
+1 Good job to all.. Happy hunting to all
Yes please close thread
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:28 am
by InR
that was ok
Re: FS vs TA
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:19 am
by ~Coyle~
Drahazar wrote:I hate NAPs DRAs any thing that removes the sandbox element of this game, i love open freedom and the ability to do whatever i want, its fun.
I am bitter that i'm now in a 6 month NAP and there isn't anything i can do about that, Mezz and Daku before me knew that long wars pretty much kill activity, and with this game at what maybe 200 active now, im sure sure it could survive any more 2+ year wars.
Colye you forget that during the DDE war which was FS's last long war, a good 90% of those that fought in it have either left the game or have vacced indefinitely, sure i would have fought for the next 4 years or so and giving it my all, however would that have been the best option for the family.
Wars are always predictable in the fact that they always escalate, me and math agreed to keep it FS-TA but eventually it would have been FSF vs TAF, and that wouldn't have been best choice for the family at all
I do not like NAPs i do not like DRAs, it is highly unlikely that i will bow to any such agreements in a very long time, this has been a nasty pill to swallow for me and its going to taste bitter for the next 6 months, but you do what your alliance needs you to do.
If you want to complain Coyle, try returning to FS and actually lending a hand. You have been away for so long i doubt you could even name 5 members of the current FS.