Page 33 of 87
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Mon May 26, 2014 7:55 am
by Setesh
Mathlord wrote:When I massed you last night your defense was half the size it was when I spied you last Sunday...so I don't entirely know how your logs were empty lol...in fact...in that recon, you had a 70 tril defense whereas last night you had a 30 tril defense with 60 mil weapons and 30 mil def supers...there would have been no way for those 30 mil defense supers to hold a 70 tril defense...someone would have had to mass your defense supers down quite a bit since last Sunday. I agree with your assessment about your PPTs this week though.
@ Huxley, the majority of Omegans sit with next to nothing built...or are on vac mode.
Nice return massing tonight HE...always a pleasure to remove your stats and have mine removed in return! Now go ac the people I'm massing since you keep distracting me haha.
Now now Math, you and I both know by OE he means "Rhett and Andy"
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Mon May 26, 2014 8:01 am
by Mathlord
They should really change the name to that...cut the dead weight. Could probably get a sitcom out of it too
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Mon May 26, 2014 9:20 am
by Setesh
Mathlord wrote:They should really change the name to that...cut the dead weight. Could probably get a sitcom out of it too
"Rhandy"?
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Mon May 26, 2014 1:44 pm
by High Empty
When I massed you last night your defense was half the size it was when I spied you last Sunday...so I don't entirely know how your logs were empty lol...in fact...in that recon, you had a 70 tril defense whereas last night you had a 30 tril defense with 60 mil weapons and 30 mil def supers...there would have been no way for those 30 mil defense supers to hold a 70 tril defense...someone would have had to mass your defense supers down quite a bit since last Sunday. I agree with your assessment about your PPTs this week though.
@ Huxley, the majority of Omegans sit with next to nothing built...or are on vac mode.
Nice return massing tonight HE...always a pleasure to remove your stats and have mine removed in return! Now go ac the people I'm massing since you keep distracting me haha.
if you looked i said Simpson i just didn't finish with the 22 pages that you and Simpson added to me yesterday, however prior to that my logs all disappear from the last massing you gave me or KJ.
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Mon May 26, 2014 2:07 pm
by Setesh
Or "Anette"
![[047.gif] :smt047](./images/smilies/047.gif)
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Mon May 26, 2014 2:44 pm
by Clockwork
Setesh wrote:Or "Anette"
![[047.gif] :smt047](./images/smilies/047.gif)
I errr, don't want to picture that thanks

Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Mon May 26, 2014 11:13 pm
by Mathlord
And another rank 2 statted High Empty is massed...all defenses in Omega were zeroed. There are still some nuisance defenses in Delta and Titans, but nothing worth mentioning. Left a defense for you guys.
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 9:52 pm
by Mathlord
Every defense in the Omegan Empire off PPT is 0. This would not have been the case as ETL still had his defense, but someone decided to use an alliance PPT I guess to protect him or the others who had already been zeroed. Either way, party rockin in the house tonight.
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 4:54 am
by Huxley
Mathlord wrote:They should really change the name to that...cut the dead weight. Could probably get a sitcom out of it too
That's a bit ironic coming from you.
Speaking of which, who has a defense built in TA? Nope. No one. All 0. Yawn. Anything worth nibbling on in the other cannon fodder filled alliances, nope. Double yawn.
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 5:44 am
by dgb
Huxley wrote:Mathlord wrote:They should really change the name to that...cut the dead weight. Could probably get a sitcom out of it too
That's a bit ironic coming from you.
Speaking of which, who has a defense built in TA? Nope. No one. All 0. Yawn. Anything worth nibbling on in the other cannon fodder filled alliances, nope. Double yawn.
dgb rank 2 Defensive Action 58,133,141,879,400 Ranked: 11 not off ppt at mo will be soon altoe you didnt state that anyway.
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 6:38 am
by Mathlord
lol Huxley, you gave up your nibbling abilities when you decided the only thing you'd do in gatewars is sit here and rant. That said, please do go nibble something! Prove to us there's still life left in the troll.
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 6:47 am
by Huxley
dgb wrote:Huxley wrote:Mathlord wrote:They should really change the name to that...cut the dead weight. Could probably get a sitcom out of it too
That's a bit ironic coming from you.
Speaking of which, who has a defense built in TA? Nope. No one. All 0. Yawn. Anything worth nibbling on in the other cannon fodder filled alliances, nope. Double yawn.
dgb rank 2 Defensive Action 58,133,141,879,400 Ranked: 11 not off ppt at mo will be soon altoe you didnt state that anyway.
You answered your own query there.
Mathlord wrote:lol Huxley, you gave up your nibbling abilities when you decided the only thing you'd do in gatewars is sit here and rant. That said, please do go nibble something! Prove to us there's still life left in the troll.
Mathlord Defense wrote:Defensive Action 0
Nibble what?
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 7:15 am
by Mathlord
Apologies, there you go...nibble away. Don't say I don't give you anything...
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 10:28 am
by Huxley
Mathlord wrote:Apologies, there you go...nibble away. Don't say I don't give you anything...
I turned away from the screen for a hour or so...
Mathlord wrote:Defensive Action 0
Your defenses don't last long do they? I assume that was Duderanch this time.
Re: TÅF vs OE
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 11:06 am
by Mathlord
Well it most certainly wasn't you. Defense back again. I have war settings out with most of the big fighters in this war. My defenses aren't meant to last. Just to give who are willing to give me a war setting back something to play with
