StarGateWars Forums

Wepwaet wrote:Yall heard the man, who's up for a rousing chorus of "Jason does not listen"?

Wepwaet wrote:Were their any plans on reducing the science house's bonus?

Wepwaet wrote:Are Alliance bought perks permanent? As in would the increase in bank capacity stay if you switched alliances?

Forum wrote:done and done.
def weapons now corrode more slowly, and are also helped by realm alert...

MaxSterling wrote:

Sarevok wrote:...and weapons lasting longer.

This is really the only option to increase a defense's usefulness. Which is why my suggestion to tie weapon fatigue to realm alert would probably work the best.

Increasing costs hurts smaller players.

No matter what the power levels are, massing will not change unless the weapons last longer.

Clarkey wrote:

CCTheCapedCrusader™ wrote:perg should be for those only below Living God and 30 million or taken away altogether now as it gives us more to play with

Maybe scrap the perg army size limit and only make perg accessible for the first 90 days since an account has been created? Or something along those lines...... a certain amount of time that gives a new account enough time to grow in perg and ascend to a decent level before being kicked out of perg after 90 or whatever days?

Sylus wrote:I have no interest in playing norm for a while. I played it for 2 1/2 years, and at the end I stopped enjoying the game.

I came to perg, I found a slower pace, where I could still enjoy the game. There are already enough restrictions on perg as is, 60 turn on a single player, no market, restricted turns, restricted army size.

It's like hitting my head against the wall when I talk to norm players about perg. I either get called a coward, or someone who exploits the system. And it's all about rank (read: egos), perg ranks upset norm . The fact that perg is a different style of play that relies on higher power levels with a capped army size never enters into it. I never saw perg as a place to grow, I built my account in norm, and ascended to EAG there. It's easier to grow in norm, with an abundance of farms, and access to the market.

And yet you talk about ascension restrictions, look at the ascension requirements as is, you do realise that perg players have to work their butt off to get the resources for high end ascensions, and they can't stay in perg to do it.

Let's make it perfectly clear. Norm players hate perg. Simple, nothing constructive is ever said, norm is hell bent on making it unplayable. And if you put those updates in, you will have succeeded. Even a 90 day cap, what would the point be? Might as well just obliterate it. Honestly, why does perg affect norm so much?

Have you ever stopped to think that you are going out of your way to reprimand players who have found somewhere they enjoy playing the game, and continue to? For no discernible reason.

I'm pretty sure the game is struggling to get new members, and it's stuggling to sustain existing members, if you stay the course of screwing up perg, I guarantee you will lose 80% of active players in perg. I'm more inclined to say 100%. I for one have no immediate desire to play in norm. It's got nothing to do with big numbers, I just find it more fun in perg. And I don't see something inherently wrong with that. And yet I have other players who have nothing to do with perg constantly trying to kill any and all enjoyment I have from playing period.

Well Kudos to you.

renegadze wrote:I would guess many use and play perg the way it was always intended...however some are clearly abusing the fact they can't be massed, it's almost like giving them perma PPT. If you don't want anything changed with ranks\power\ascended levels...how about if admin removes the 60 turns a day on 1 player rule? how long do you think until a lot of main players drop size and come in there massing?

Sarevok wrote:

renegadze wrote:I would guess many use and play perg the way it was always intended...however some are clearly abusing the fact they can't be massed, it's almost like giving them perma PPT. If you don't want anything changed with ranks\power\ascended levels...how about if admin removes the 60 turns a day on 1 player rule? how long do you think until a lot of main players drop size and come in there massing?

Erm, why don't alliances/empires to it now then? They do it on main, why not do it in preg. If you got 100 players in there, at 60AT/player, I'm pretty sure you could mass everyone in there. Heck, even 20 players in there is plenty. 2/3rds of the people in an alliance broker their UU to other members, enter perg, mass with the 40-50mUU they enter with, and then leave again.

I can see the appeal of perg. If you can only play lets say 2 hours/day. That allows you to do all the farming you want. 15AT/hit over 4 turns (2hours) and your done for the day. Unlike main, where you can sit there and farm the same people for hours if you have the time