Page 5 of 6
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:09 am
by ThunderCat
The reason I want my warning removed is that I did not know I was breaking the rules. you had still told him it was fine. If you told me to remove the sig I would have removed it. I could understand your grounds for warning me if I had refused to remove it, but hey look it's gone....
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:11 am
by Nimras
Don Lewis wrote:Why is **Filtered** considered offensive? That in itself is pathetic.
Ask Smooshable and Bazsy as they make the word filter and decide that alone.
Nimras.ThunderCat wrote:also I still haven't heard why the medical term for someone's behind hole is in the filter
I say this for the last time if you dont find it right that this word is in the filter and why making it stand out means you breake the filter take it up with Smooshable and Bazsy they alone decide the filter until its removed accept your breaking rules.
Nimras.ThunderCat wrote:The reason I want my warning removed is that I did not know I was breaking the rules. you had still told him it was fine. If you told me to remove the sig I would have removed it. I could understand your grounds for warning me if I had refused to remove it, but hey look it's gone....
Actually i warn you for writing and bypass the filter not the sig should i take a look at that sig also??
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:12 am
by ThunderCat
Nimras wrote:Don Lewis wrote:Why is **Filtered** considered offensive? That in itself is pathetic.
Ask Smooshable and Bazsy as they make the word filter and decide that alone.
Nimras.ThunderCat wrote:also I still haven't heard why the medical term for someone's behind hole is in the filter
I say this for the last time if you dont find it right that this word is in the filter and why making it stand out means you breake the filter take it up with Smooshable and Bazsy they alone decide the filter until its removed accept your breaking rules.
Nimras.ThunderCat wrote:The reason I want my warning removed is that I did not know I was breaking the rules. you had still told him it was fine. If you told me to remove the sig I would have removed it. I could understand your grounds for warning me if I had refused to remove it, but hey look it's gone....
Actually i warn you for writing and bypass the filter not the sig should i take a look at that sig also??
where did I bypass the filter?
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:13 am
by Azarak
ThunderCat wrote:where did I bypass the filter?
Dont both fighting, its just a waste of time. The Mods do what they want and meh.
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:15 am
by Brdavs
Yes Brdavs got a warning too, ty for your concern geisha, lol.
Not sure why but hey, who am I to argue the powers at be about the finer points of things, they have enough of you on their backs heh... I`ll just consider myself a noble sacrifice on the altar of impartiality to the never satisfied gods of whining.
Warning recieved and noted, pax.
FUALL (is gonna loose) (
)
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:16 am
by Maha Vishnu
As the alliance war system cannot calculate the true winner then no one will win, as there is endless UU/NAQ/Turns.
It will come down to which players get bored. Both sides could war for a year and no one would win, simple as that.
Then. when a the dust has settled, a draw has been called, NAPS ALL AROUND, you will all congratulate one another and have warm milk and cookies whilst the harder core will have beers + cookies.
All friends again
It is a shame, that the system could not calculate TOTAL war deaths of each side and amounts of attack turns used and flash it up on the forums so we sad people could sit and see the death toll rise in real time
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:16 am
by Nimras
Azarak wrote:ThunderCat wrote:where did I bypass the filter?
Dont both fighting, its just a waste of time. The Mods do what they want and meh.
Acutally me and ThunderCat is talking as i found out he where refering to a warning not given by me lol my bad 
Nimras
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:17 am
by TheRook
your warning sticks Thundercat.
you only have 2 you havent been suspended... I've been on here for 2 years and not received one... it should be easy to keep not get any more warnings.
The whole Janus Pact being used to mask the word anus which is filtered is no being brought to a close...
warnings are given now to all who by pass the filters/forum rules using images/text with or without masking.
Also implying the word anus but typing janus pact at the end doesn't mean its ok.
This is a note for everyone.
TheRook
actually... I'm going to get Nimras to give me a warning... as I got over the top in the FUAL vs TJP thread while not breaking any rules I was taunting FUALL players and to make it fair I should get one.
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:21 am
by Brdavs
Here is a radical idea... how bout both fuall and TJP just rename into something gradeschoolers can`t reinterpert in a profane way and we`re home&dry heh...
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:23 am
by Mordack
Brdavs wrote:Here is a radical idea... how bout both fuall and TJP just rename into something gradeschoolers can`t reinterpert in a profane way and we`re home&dry heh...
Team A and Team B?
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:31 am
by ThunderCat
TheRook wrote:your warning sticks Thundercat.
you only have 2 you havent been suspended... I've been on here for 2 years and not received one... it should be easy to keep not get any more warnings.
The whole Janus Pact being used to mask the word **Filtered** which is filtered is no being brought to a close...
warnings are given now to all who by pass the filters/forum rules using images/text with or without masking.
Also implying the word **Filtered** but typing janus pact at the end doesn't mean its ok.
This is a note for everyone.
TheRook
actually... I'm going to get Nimras to give me a warning... as I got over the top in the FUAL vs TJP thread while not breaking any rules I was taunting FUALL players and to make it fair I should get one.
so their name should be filtered then.
I don't care about your warning. It doesn't erase my warning. maybe if you took a timeout for your biased modding I would be happy, but that's not going to happen. instead of doing your real job, you waste time on silly crap like this so that you can try to ban people on the other side of a war who annoy you.
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:34 am
by ThunderCat
also everyone in radical minority should be warned for having sigs that say "f'n u all up the janus". this is a violation of the filter also.
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:34 am
by TheRook
ThunderCat wrote:also everyone in radical minority should be warned for having sigs that say "f'n u all up the janus". this is a violation of the filter also.
already done.
theRook
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:35 am
by Brdavs
Judochop wrote:Mordack wrote:Brdavs wrote:Here is a radical idea... how bout both fuall and TJP just rename into something gradeschoolers can`t reinterpert in a profane way and we`re home&dry heh...
Team A and Team B?
I like it.
Blahh is mr. T mark2; new and vastly improved (minus the bling bling) so I hereby officially call dibbs on "The A Team" for the "entity formely known as TJP".
We pitty the fualls!
Re: FUALL or Janus pact?
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:35 am
by geisha
I really wonder what kind of comments I would get on the forums if I created an empire and named something like "Black Assgard Hole"... I mean seriously... don't people think about what a name rhymes with... "Janus Pact" really is kinda asking for it.
Guess we were just one step ahead when we created the Fundamentally Unbreakable Alliance and made sure it would have a nice abbreviation