StarGateWars Forums

Memento wrote: yt it was FUALL who exploited that "bug" and didnt whine abut it here.

it was dirty dozen, at the time it got removed FUALL didn't evn existed yet.

dastupy wrote:

Memento wrote: yt it was FUALL who exploited that "bug" and didnt whine abut it here.

it was dirty dozen, at the time it got removed FUALL didn't evn existed yet.

Different name, same old players.

actually FUALL members right now are "exploiting" it

Well as the same goes, when the door is open. I"m going to walk on in.

Since i wasn't calling doc or any of you using it cheating, and i still don't believe that it's cheaping. I know it's just a Loophole.

no its a FEATURE lol

Mato wrote:no its a FEATURE lol

Yup, a feature that makes wars rather pointless when used heavily. Which is why it was posted about in the 1st place, not because we were "whining", but because we knew how lame the war would become when we started using it like we did tonight.

Borek wrote:

Mato wrote:no its a FEATURE lol

Yup, a feature that makes wars rather pointless when used heavily. Which is why it was posted about in the 1st place, not because we were "whining", but because we knew how lame the war would become when we started using it like we did tonight.

Then how come the AC feature that made wars more interesting and diverse was taken out? Clearly the aim is to make wars as slow, dull and boring as possible amiright?

High Empty wrote:Well as the same goes, when the door is open. I"m going to walk on in.

Since i wasn't calling doc or any of you using it cheating, and i still don't believe that it's cheaping. I know it's just a Loophole.

Then why did you post in the cheater's section and not the bugs section

Vendetta wrote:

Borek wrote:

Mato wrote:no its a FEATURE lol

Yup, a feature that makes wars rather pointless when used heavily. Which is why it was posted about in the 1st place, not because we were "whining", but because we knew how lame the war would become when we started using it like we did tonight.

Then how come the AC feature that made wars more interesting and diverse was taken out? Clearly the aim is to make wars as slow, dull and boring as possible amiright?

Because being able to kill a defense of unlimited size with 1 attack weapon and less than half the number of spies the enemy has as assassins was deemed unfair by jason and changed.

Mathlord wrote:

High Empty wrote:Well as the same goes, when the door is open. I"m going to walk on in.

Since i wasn't calling doc or any of you using it cheating, and i still don't believe that it's cheaping. I know it's just a Loophole.

Then why did you post in the cheater's section and not the bugs section

Lol you want the honest truth, cause i made a mistake, happens, i when looking in the bug section the morning after i posted, and though hmm i wonder which admin deleted my post again...

but then i found it here.

Borek wrote:

Vendetta wrote:

Borek wrote:

Mato wrote:no its a FEATURE lol

Yup, a feature that makes wars rather pointless when used heavily. Which is why it was posted about in the 1st place, not because we were "whining", but because we knew how lame the war would become when we started using it like we did tonight.

Then how come the AC feature that made wars more interesting and diverse was taken out? Clearly the aim is to make wars as slow, dull and boring as possible amiright?

Because being able to kill a defense of unlimited size with 1 attack weapon and less than half the number of spies the enemy has as assassins was deemed unfair by jason and changed.

1 attack weapon yes, half the AC as spies ONLY IF you have atleast a few levels higher AC than they do covert, and then you also need spies to sab, and a descent spy level to do it with, and then a strike atleast half the size the defence was. It's not like it was a no cost tactic, infact the loss ratios were pretty dam close to your regular successful massing ratios, only this made it acctually possible to take the defence down in a reasonable amount of time, rather than giving them time to have a shower, sleep, eat, go for a walk, then come and repair.

And if nox is changed then i find it unfair that people cant hold a strike capable of massing defences THE WAY FORUM seems to want it done outside of PPT.

What is inevitably going to happen is both alliances are going to be required to have every member off PPT at once, and the alliances take turns not being online. Otherwise every war there are gonna be people left with defences because no one is gonna bother even trying to hold a strike. And if they build and sell they will get accused of cheating


Jason, get new advisors, your current ones suck.

just remove nox from the game its a pile of **Filtered** that reduces the benefits of turn farming

High Empty wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

High Empty wrote:Well as the same goes, when the door is open. I"m going to walk on in.

Since i wasn't calling doc or any of you using it cheating, and i still don't believe that it's cheaping. I know it's just a Loophole.

Then why did you post in the cheater's section and not the bugs section

Lol you want the honest truth, cause i made a mistake, happens, i when looking in the bug section the morning after i posted, and though hmm i wonder which admin deleted my post again...

but then i found it here.

High & Empty probly

Actually their is something that might make it harder. But it wouldn't make any diffrence as their are "Empires"

u could suggest that attacking ur own allaince members is forbidden like u have the relationship between Command & Officer.

However like I said its totally pointless in suggesting it as their are "Empires" with diffrent teams that can "Phase u".

Althougt , dont tell OE & DDE never tryed it or never done it to say the least High Empty cus that would be a terrible lie.