Page 5 of 5

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:23 am
by GeneralChaos
pianomutt20000 wrote:Nope, this thread can't be locked ;)



It's not your decision Chaos, quit spamming please. I'd hate to see you warned.


Bill



Actually your right, i never thought of it this way, technically as your surrender was rejected and your still an enemy to the Empire, per the war, your officers are fair game.

See ya soon :)

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:54 am
by pianomutt20000
GeneralChaos wrote:
pianomutt20000 wrote:Nope, this thread can't be locked ;)



It's not your decision Chaos, quit spamming please. I'd hate to see you warned.


Bill



Actually your right, i never thought of it this way, technically as your surrender was rejected and your still an enemy to the Empire, per the war, your officers are fair game.

See ya soon :)



That's officers and CO.

Can't forget the CO part, or you don't follow the war.

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 2:37 pm
by Flavar
Wow i really love this high mighty surrender not acceptet party.

I really dont know what all whent on... But one thing is clear Bill doesnot break his word.

So the problem is just some people who right now are in positions of power that hold silly grudges like 5 year olds.

Nothing more than expected. Its just sad what the game became.

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 2:56 pm
by Tekki
Flavar wrote:Wow i really love this high mighty surrender not acceptet party.

I really dont know what all whent on... But one thing is clear Bill doesnot break his word.

So the problem is just some people who right now are in positions of power that hold silly grudges like 5 year olds.

Nothing more than expected. Its just sad what the game became.

LOL Fine one to talk about long memories, considering how short yours seems to be.

I believe the reason his surrender has been rejected in this case is partially for some of the older stuff and the following: going from Alpha to TG in the space of 5 hours or so, and inciting members of Alpha to leave during the war. That's the sort of thing that does encourage leadership - no matter who they are to refrain from allowing surrender.

It could be other reasons, I'm not pretending I know but I suspect that is at least some of the reason.

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:31 pm
by Mordack
I am now going to personally petition FUALL's leadership for the continued rejection of pianomutt2000's surrender. You can thank Flavar for that.

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:41 pm
by Antz
hey hey hey, once more, you can't really hold bill responsible for what others have posted,

granted, if he himself had posted it, i could understand your comment Mister Mordack..(:P)


I agree with what has already been said though, what's posted here isn't likely to help bill's case and should be conducted behind the scenes as much as possible. This isn't a matter for public discussion, it's between two parties (or three if you include AK...:P) and no matter what joe bloggs thinks should happen, that won't change...:)

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:16 pm
by Mordack
Well, maybe he should discourage his friends from posting such high-and-mighty standoffish comments in his defense.

I'm not going to lie; I'm starting to like Bill. I think he's been an excellent omnsbudsman, and I think he generally has a good head on his shoulders. But this entire thread, and almost everything I've read in it, makes me want to get down my knees and beg my leadership not to accept his surrender. I'm sorry, but his friends should have had the sense to realise how bad this would look.

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:16 pm
by Mango
GeneralChaos wrote:You cant help yourself can you mutt,

This thread can be locked,

Its not up for discussion, the surrender was refused, this thread is pointless.

Thanks


Sounds like someone has got some unresolved issues that they need to address.

Mordack wrote:I am now going to personally petition FUALL's leadership for the continued rejection of pianomutt2000's surrender. You can thank Flavar for that.


personally???

wow

now its time for people to sit up and take notice when someone of your calibure PERSONALLY petitions the FUALL's leadership

I didnt realize it was that serious, but now....well, I guess I know :)

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:22 pm
by Mordack
Mordack wrote:I am now going to personally petition FUALL's leadership for the continued rejection of pianomutt2000's surrender. You can thank Flavar for that.


Mango wrote:personally???

wow

now its time for people to sit up and take notice when someone of your calibure PERSONALLY petitions the FUALL's leadership

I didnt realize it was that serious, but now....well, I guess I know :)


I'm glad you agree. :lol:

But there we go.. another sarcastic, anti-FUALL post from one of Bill's supporters, and another example of how you really aren't helping his case. Nice job digging the hole.

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:40 pm
by Mango
Mordack wrote:I'm glad you agree. :lol:

But there we go.. another sarcastic, anti-FUALL post from one of Bill's supporters, and another example of how you really aren't helping his case. Nice job digging the hole.


Sometimes you have to call a spade and spade and sometimes you just have to hit someone with a spade.

Please enlighten me how my post was anti-FUALL or are you in 'Paranoid' mode?

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:44 pm
by Mordack
Mango wrote:
Mordack wrote:I'm glad you agree. :lol:

But there we go.. another sarcastic, anti-FUALL post from one of Bill's supporters, and another example of how you really aren't helping his case. Nice job digging the hole.


Sometimes you have to call a spade and spade and sometimes you just have to hit someone with a spade.

Please enlighten me how my post was anti-FUALL or are you in 'Paranoid' mode?


It was a sarcastic, albeit funny, comment that was clearly intended to undermine a FUALL member's opinion regarding the surrender. Perhaps not as brazenly Anti-FUALL as your average TJP post, but hilariously unproductive to pianomutt's cause nonetheless.

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:17 pm
by GunZ
Curumo wrote:Lmao mango. Classic.

Bill i would accept it, if it was me in charge. But it's not me in charge. So anything we say here won't change anything. Wait for things to cool a bit, wait for etl to speak to gunz and talk to gunz and that's it. Not much more you can do about it now.

Mango:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIfuaUTH9Y4 :wink:



I will say this a final time ...I have stated multiple times .
Quite honestly I do not understand why there is still debate or discussion on this matter.

I will not accept Pianomutt's surrender.

As I have told Bill privately , in real life he may well be a terrific person ,and I do not wish him ill this world, but in this game he has gone out of his way multiple times to cause harm and disharmony with my mates and with my alliance. Frankly it would be betraying my OE mates to allow him an opportunity to do so again ...and I won't.

It will not happen again on my watch .

Now you guys can talk to ETL all you want, but you are wasting your breath. This decision is made , it has been stated over and over, and it will not change.

Re: about pianomutt2000

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:23 pm
by weilandsmith
Since an emphatic decision from the OE leadership has been delivered, topic locked... sorry Bill.