Page 5 of 7
Re: Development
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:41 pm
by Richard_Destroyer
adminGary wrote:Agreed, if we do implement a market, it well be extremely limited in function.
Glad to hear it

Re: Development
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:41 pm
by Lore
Make it so you trade with "the market" and limit/kill P2P trades.
Re: Development
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:08 pm
by Iƒrit
being able to create allianecs would be a good start

Re: Development
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:11 pm
by SmokeJaguar
Lore wrote:Make it so you trade with "the market" and limit/kill P2P trades.
100% agree. no P2P trading EVER.
Re: Development
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:15 pm
by Iƒrit
SmokeJaguar wrote:Lore wrote:Make it so you trade with "the market" and limit/kill P2P trades.
100% agree. no P2P trading EVER.
Nah I think you could still have P2P trades just limit the amount of transfers you get say like 1 or 2 a week or something like that, maybe make it so you need SS to do it.
Re: Development
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 6:18 pm
by Lore
Ifrit wrote: maybe make it so you need SS to do it.
I totally disagree, The one thing i always admired about SGW was the fact anyone could become equal in time, a non $$ donater could get the same benifits as a donater by ascending
no ascention = non $$ can not = a donater
Please dont do that, its not fair if $$ can get things thos without $$ can
Re: Development
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 6:22 pm
by Iƒrit
Lore wrote:Ifrit wrote: maybe make it so you need SS to do it.
I totally disagree, The one thing i always admired about SGW was the fact anyone could become equal in time, a non $$ donater could get the same benifits as a donater by ascending
no ascention = non $$ can not = a donater
Please dont do that, its not fair if $$ can get things thos without $$ can
fair enough, i can understand that sentiment
Re: Development
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:38 pm
by Arcturus
Lore wrote:Ifrit wrote: maybe make it so you need SS to do it.
I totally disagree, The one thing i always admired about SGW was the fact anyone could become equal in time, a non $$ donater could get the same benifits as a donater by ascending
no ascention = non $$ can not = a donater
Please dont do that, its not fair if $$ can get things thos without $$ can
I agree, there should always be a way for nonpaying players to be equal with those that choose to play for cash.
If there is no way for someone to gain all bonuses on their own without the use of money, the bonuses should not exist.
Re: Development
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:47 pm
by adminGary
At this time we have no intentions (aside from a prefix) of giving SS special bonuses that are unavalible to everyone else.
Re: Development
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 8:33 pm
by Manetheren
I really liked the undead race from quantum a couple of waves ago. A 5th race would be nice, maybe the wraith with those undead bonuses? Just throwing it out there.
Re: Development
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:09 pm
by ~Josh~
That would be deeply changing the original version, thus making "Origins" pointless.
Re: Development
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:32 pm
by Manetheren
~Josh~ wrote:That would be deeply changing the original version, thus making "Origins" pointless.
Yes I know.. just throwing it out there.. lol
Re: Development
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:43 am
by Skunky
kinda need to change all the quantum stuff
other than that, just need to implement all the ideas and test them in beta ect.
good job
Re: Development
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:57 am
by Cole
In my opinion, alliances and commanders/officers relations must be added.

Rest seems ok, even though I suppose sooner or later adding super soldiers would be a good idea.
Re: Development
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:41 am
by Skunky
don't suppoe we can get a personal log
