Page 5 of 7
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:39 am
by Finn
The TA used to have a lot of honor. Back in the days of yester year they had players who truly knew what the term "respect" meant, people like Munchy, Blitz, Jamesdavies42, Manetheren, Freespirt, and others that I've forgotten or have moved on.
Now however they have allowed their ranks to be filled by people who at the very least are questionable in their "honor". People used to blame Omega all the time for massing someone because of a post they made here on these forums, and yet in this very thread we have TA members saying that they'll mass you for posting anything against the the TA (qacol) and that a 200 mil army massing an under 5 mil army is ok because, wait for it......its a war game (mathlord).
As a longtime player who left and came back in a much more minor role from my previous gameplay, I have to say that I am very disappointed in the TA. While I was on the opposite side of them in many wars long since past, I always held a bit of respect and dare I say it admiration for the TA. There were many a night I spent massing TA members in game, whilst chatting with them on MSN. It seems almost impossible to image that same thing happening now though, which really is a shame.
In the rush to beat FUALL the TA has allowed themselves to become the very thing they claimed to be fighting against.
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:01 am
by Manetheren
Finn wrote:The TA used to have a lot of honor. Back in the days of yester year they had players who truly knew what the term "respect" meant, people like Munchy, Blitz, Jamesdavies42, Manetheren, Freespirt, and others that I've forgotten or have moved on.
Now however they have allowed their ranks to be filled by people who at the very least are questionable in their "honor". People used to blame Omega all the time for massing someone because of a post they made here on these forums, and yet in this very thread we have TA members saying that they'll mass you for posting anything against the the TA (qacol) and that a 200 mil army massing an under 5 mil army is ok because, wait for it......its a war game (mathlord).
As a longtime player who left and came back in a much more minor role from my previous gameplay, I have to say that I am very disappointed in the TA. While I was on the opposite side of them in many wars long since past, I always held a bit of respect and dare I say it admiration for the TA. There were many a night I spent massing TA members in game, whilst chatting with them on MSN. It seems almost impossible to image that same thing happening now though, which really is a shame.
In the rush to beat FUALL the TA has allowed themselves to become the very thing they claimed to be fighting against.
Thanks for the mention mate. I must say I disagree with you though. While we have become more aggressive in the last year or so we still are not Fuall and will never be like them.
Now I have been gone for over a week and havent read all of Sempers red and white posts but I do wonder what purpose is served by attacking someones recruitment post.
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:03 am
by GeneralChaos
Thats right your not FUALL, your worse, you ally yourself and support The Educators ( TLE ) which is alot worse, you cant deny that now can you, (which i am aware a few members of FUALL joined and should have been booted because of it)
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:07 am
by Skunky 2.0
GeneralChaos wrote:Thats right your not FUALL, your worse, you ally yourself and support The Educators ( TLE ) which is alot worse, you cant deny that now can you, (which i am aware a few members of FUALL joined and should have been booted because of it)
some of FUALL were not educators? how are TA worse than FUALL who do obviouisly are ignostic to the fact that they DO NOT go around bullying, sitting on people forcing them to contiue fighting.
'the enemy of our enemy are our friends'
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:18 am
by Brdavs
GeneralChaos wrote:Thats right your not FUALL, your worse, you ally yourself and support The Educators ( TLE ) which is alot worse, you cant deny that now can you, (which i am aware a few members of FUALL joined and should have been booted because of it)
I`m getting tired of this being dumped to TLEs lap. And even IF TE were TLE exclusive, so what?
I got 2 words for you mister, Bloody Sunday. Heck, more words... GA... MAD... Random ID generator. Tik tok tik tok. etc. etc.
So
shove it GeneralHypocrite. Or disband pritty much all FUA alliances and boot your leaders.
You guys at FUA are just irked that some other alliances made the mental jump to the state where omega&co has been for ages and that enabled the old guard some sort of "rule" ("rule" they`d like to recreate to this day, but tough bannanas, the world has changed) since they were the first to get there: not backing down even when/if reason/decency dictates / being pushovers / caring much for others oppionion / being out for n1, allways.
booo hooo people. How dare the meanies brake our meanie monopoly?

Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:59 am
by Draleg
Brdavs wrote: Or disband pritty much all FUA alliances and boot your leaders.
But then who will bully ppl ?
Lets face it , we need to be what we are , all games need good and evil .
All ppl fill in for them selves what they consider to be the good side and bad.
You don't back down , we don't back down , so what , like the rest of the server cares , they have there own things to worry about and its not 2 pigheaded empires and there history.
The day this war end is probably the day 30 % of the ppl in the war will quit the game , stubbornness is a good motive to keep playing.
now lets stop throwing stones in this tread and get back to insulting in the GC

Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:00 am
by arkangel13
yeee shall be judge in our court of game law. If you dont like TOO
BAD.
Draleg i like ur post
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:31 am
by Brdavs
Draleg wrote:Brdavs wrote: Or disband pritty much all FUA alliances and boot your leaders.
But then who will bully ppl ?
Lets face it , we need to be what we are , all games need good and evil .
All ppl fill in for them selves what they consider to be the good side and bad.
You don't back down , we don't back down , so what , like the rest of the server cares , they have there own things to worry about and its not 2 pigheaded empires and there history.
The day this war end is probably the day 30 % of the ppl in the war will quit the game , stubbornness is a good motive to keep playing.
now lets stop throwing stones in this tread and get back to insulting in the GC

Fine by me.
Just wish you made a habit of showing up with these profound pearls of wisdom in time to stop guys like GC getting on their lill soap box preaching about deeds and practices their alliances and leaders either fathered or made mainstream.
Cos one cant really take that sort of twofaced sermons without his kettle temp. raising a few degrees.
Who the heck is he and what friggin alliance/empire/powerblock is he part of, to be more papal than the pope about these things in such threads. Hes`avin a laugh, that`s what he is, hes`avin a laugh. But it just ain`t the funneh.
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 7:58 am
by GeneralChaos
Brdavs wrote:Draleg wrote:Brdavs wrote: Or disband pritty much all FUA alliances and boot your leaders.
But then who will bully ppl ?
Lets face it , we need to be what we are , all games need good and evil .
All ppl fill in for them selves what they consider to be the good side and bad.
You don't back down , we don't back down , so what , like the rest of the server cares , they have there own things to worry about and its not 2 pigheaded empires and there history.
The day this war end is probably the day 30 % of the ppl in the war will quit the game , stubbornness is a good motive to keep playing.
now lets stop throwing stones in this tread and get back to insulting in the GC

Fine by me.
Just wish you made a habit of showing up with these profound pearls of wisdom in time to stop guys like GC getting on their lill soap box preaching about deeds and practices their alliances and leaders either fathered or made mainstream.
Cos one cant really take that sort of twofaced sermons without his kettle temp. raising a few degrees.
Who the heck is he and what friggin alliance/empire/powerblock is he part of, to be more papal than the pope about these things in such threads. Hes`avin a laugh, that`s what he is, hes`avin a laugh. But it just ain`t the funneh.
Do you have the ability to read English if so, the answer to your question is in my sig.
Now go round up your little education group you call the educators and go mass some 5 mill army guy with no co and no alliance so you can feel like a big man again.
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:24 am
by Brdavs
n1: You obviosuly can read english but lack the mental capacity to recognise rhetorical questions.
n2: I can`t round guys up and go educate a 5 mil guy. Cos all the educators members of TLE (that I`m aware of) are no longer playing SGW.
Geisha for one however, is still in Omega. (Believe you me, I use the term "still there" as loosly as possible.) When you see her, ask her if she`s up for a stroll down the memory lane with me tagging allong? Heck, just send anyone from your leaders here, that`s guaranteed random massings fun. Only wish some of them hadn`t left, cos the field of candidates for massing ppl for things posted seems to have narrowed whith that.
So once again GH, stick your hypocracy where the sun don`t shine, ok? Noone is "madre theresa" around here, that`s for sure, but the chimneyman doesn`t get to point at other ppls black/dirt marks on white shirts crying "shame!". "Big man". *kiss*
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:48 am
by Mathlord
Finn wrote: that a 200 mil army massing an under 5 mil army is ok because, wait for it......its a war game (mathlord).
Don't misquote me, I said 200 mill armies were massing 5 mill armies in a WAR, not because it's a war game. Wars involve every member of an alliance.
About everything else, I respect your opinion, but unfortunately you're seeing alot of things out of context here thanks to some other people who pride themselves on doing nothing else but making us look bad.
@GC grow up, The Educators had plenty of OE and DDE members in it as well as TLE. Don't forget your history when you're so quick to bash others.
Scarily enough, I agree with Draleg

Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:50 am
by semper
Mathlord wrote:You can't call posting your own skewed version of history that fits your perspective and the diatribe you persist on posting as shining a light on the situation, it's merely posting to make you look good, which we know you just love
I am not going to bother replying to that, other than...no. lol.. its quite obviously none of what you have said, anyone can see that you're desperately trying to defend yourself and failing...Now excuse me, the repetitive nature of this argument is really boring me here. Keep trying to make us look bad, I'll laugh some more at you guys in the morning...well later in the morning.
lol.. another glaring display of your ignorance and inability to defend against me Mathlord. I think it appears I have succeded, the final blow shall come at the end of this post...Oh and by the way Semper, going back on something we were talking about before the last time you pretended my posts didn't exist, how long have you been on the forums this night? Or am I to assume it's once again just 6 minutes of very fast post writing

I gave y'all extra attention as I was incapable of sleeping.. I do actually have a proper problem with sleeping. I am dyslexic too.. do you and the TAM want to take the mickey out of them both too?
Norbe wrote:Semper, most of the "red writing" you added to my post adds nothing to this discussion
It's not meant to, it's just meant to counter what you say...
There is nothing much to be discussed, you guys lied, you've tried to lie again..and now your clinging to some very weak arguments to try and save face, which I am walking over with little to no effort...oh, and I am going for yellow this time!. However I will entertain the notion that a small amount of it does and I will reply accordingly. I've made things easier for you by making replies in red. If you can debate with yourself, so can I
We'll see..
Norbe wrote:What possible gain could ever arise out of the claims you are making?
I was reffering to gain from TÅs perspective,
I don't think so...within the context of the way you wrote it, thats quite certainly not what you were referring too, but ok I will humour you and allow you to change your meanings and words.. perhaps I missed out one single word which may have made things confusing. I'm not going to spend ages proofreading my posts, i dont care enough, so things like that will happen on occasion.
*insert red writing here about my inability to post*Accidents happen, people struggling like to make convenient mistakes to by time or save themselves from bad points 
Regardless there is no gain for TÅ if we "bully" and "lie".
Of course their is, lol..you bully to try and get to me, you fail at that, ignore it and say things contrary to what's happened whilst pretending they did not..which is lying. That is the point I was making.
*insert red writing here claiming we do it for funnies*Yeah...that was funny..
Semper wrote:Would you like to elaborate on that more before I reply to it? It can be a double edged sword... and of course we all dislike them. Is this saying it's ok for a player of 100+mill army size account to attack and mass an account 1/20th or less of their size? Does the TA condone those actions?
Yes I would like to elaborate. I will elaborate with an example. Player A, has a large army, but low stats due to a war. Player B is a newer player with a small army. He sees that Player A makes a lot of naq and chooses to take it. Player A then replies with a nice message saying "Please don't take my naq, i'm in a war". Player B says replies saying "I will take it whenever I want" and follows that up by several more attacks. Is Player A supposed to just let Player B continue to hit him, without hitting back, just because Player B has a smaller army? If Player A does hit
back does that make him a "bully"?
Of course it does not, however that is not what happened. The TAM and Mathlord attacked the Nemesis Quarter because I, apparently had the 'audacity' to declare war on someone else whilst I was waiting for them to give us a fight...that, is bullying a smaller group of players to try and attack me, and it failed and now I have flipped it on you guys *Insert red writing about how TÅ logging into this game is bullying and claiming otherwise is lying*Perhaps a stupid point you would make.. but my points tend not to be on par with what a 6 year old could muster.. try degree..adult sort of area for inspiration on what I would say..
In this example, Player A is the stereotypical TÅ member here. Perhaps not everyone conforms to the sterotype as well as others.
*Insert red writing containing an internet abbreviation such as rofl or lol*yeah, lol.. you got this one right. lmao..Semper wrote:This is not propaganda, its truth and you sure as hell better expect anyone reading this will know that before the end of the discussion.
All I see is someone trying to form truth about a large group of people, without knowing all of the facts.
*Insert red writing about how I don't know all of the facts, afterall I've only been a member of the alliance for years!*have you read the thread? I direct you to the latter part of this post, and then we'll see how much of the facts you know..
, so far you've pretty much displayed you know a lot about what the TA like to think they do, but not what they actually get up to..I know everything I need to know. TÅs mandate has not changed. It won't change. Yes our reactions may be more aggressive than ever before, perhaps even our fuses have shrunk a tiny bit. But our actions are always for a reason.
Erm..ok..your mandate can be whatever you want it to be. You know what my mandate is? To be a nice, informative person with respect for all people equally...do I do that? I sure as hell don't..do you follow your's..well..we shall see in a moment. Your actions always have a reason? God...do you want to get any more obvious? 'We do everything for a reason'...geeeze.. lol. OF COURSE you do.. so do I, so does a tramp on the street, so does the Queen of england and the chief of an amazonian tribe, am I talking to a pre-school kid here? [color=#FF0000]*Insert red writing containing lol or rofl again*It is a shame that the war against FUALL has spilled over to involve your alliance.
Indeed it is.. You seem like a decent bunch of people (with perhaps a few nameless exlusions).
Well I don't think you can judge anything by how we act here, most people see how I act, but know a lot differently.
However you did have plenty of time to avoid this; almost every other alliance has managed to avoid getting caught up in it.
lol.. we did do nothing. We stayed away from you guys. YOU declared war on US because...firstly it was because Jordan Sullivan apparently faked a coma (which is a pathetic reason, honestly), then it was because she scammed people for resources, yet you have no proof and well, that actually never happened...THEN it turned into something about her being an FUALL officer, and we'd all have to suffer because we were loyal to our alliance member, and now its some sort of mix between that and me being a cheeky bugger to you. I am not saying you are bullying Nemesis Sect..I never ever said that, from the word go. I said you are bullying Nemesis Quarter. No one in Nemesis Sect has below 50mill army. Do keep up old chap...(I deleted your red writing, anyone interested refer to his post...) If you wish to now cite The Pond war as another example of TÅ bullying, let me inform you that there have been many issues between TÅ and The Pond members over the past couple of years. When their names appeared in our logs and their diplomats were not being friendly, we simply raised our hand yet again.
*Insert red writing "yet another example of TÅF bullying"*You really do, have no idea why we're discussing this don't you? You have gone off on this massive tangent..under this delusion that the TA somehow have the ability to bully Nemesis Sect, let a lone actually be doing it. You've been push overs so far...Again, just so you get it..I am saying the TAM are bullying the Quarter and I believe Qacol massed Ashu and his alliance because they dared post in our support.And finally, to once again address what is said in our recruitment thread. All of the senior TÅ members agree with me here.
*Insert red writing claiming we are good at lying collectively as well as individually* Unfortunately there are numerous incidents lately of wars which have arisen that could have been avoided.
*Insert red writing blaming TÅ for this* Long wars do have an effect on everyone involved. In the future, when the dust settles on all battlefields, TÅ will still be who we always have been. We are now, its just we don't give you chance to poke your head out to see. Feel free to try, but we have our guns aimed at the right spot just incase.
*insert red WTH?*Another display at how, you really don't know what is going on...or you do, and your lying in plain sight..read below.
For everyone other than Semper. You have no reason to fear TÅ. Our guns have enough targets, so long as you don't give us a reason to point them at you. Leave us alone (and don't get caught helping our enemies) and we shall do the same to you.
~Norbe~
Please.. like anyone, like I, Semper.. fear the TA.
I don't fear anyone or anything in this game...
..because it's a game.P.S. I'm only posting once per day max in this thread. Will check it again tomorrow if I feel like it.
OK then..as apparently your HC is ignorant as to what's going on.. and to putt he final nail in.. here we go...
here is the TA, mandate supposedly..I will highlight the more, relevant areas...
Dirty Harry wrote:The Tauri Ålliance Family would like to announce we are recruiting members into our Family. The TÅ was formed in March 2005 and we are still going strong. The TÅ Family consists of the Tauri Ålliance, Tauri Ålliance Åtlantis Expedition (TÅÅE), Dark TÅ and Tauri Ålliance Training Syndicate (TÅTS).
We are at War with FUA and The Pond right now and new wars happen from time to time. We don't run from wars.
We are those that won't go around bullying, and will try to stop silly wars from starting. But rest assured, that does not mean being pushed around. We walk that line. People get what they deserve when they mess with us. As a member you agree to that.
You don't go around bullying, and you try to solve the problems when they arise. But when the metal meets the road, you are prepared to thrive in year long fights.
We don't want you if you will run from a fight. We don't want you if you
want to bully innocent SGW players.
We don't want you if you can't keep your cool and solve problems. The greater good of the TÅF is what matters. As a member you agree to do everything you can to help progress the TÅF, and the TÅF makes you the promise that the fights you are engaged in
are honorable, justified, and needed. We are an alliance that is filled with members who want to have a say, and in the TÅF you will have your say and we listen. One of the best aspects of the TÅF is that the cream always rises to the top. If you are a good player, with good ideas, humble, and comes correct, you will go far in TÅF just like all those that meet those traits have before you.
We are lighthearted, and jokes/getting a rise on our members occasionally happens, deal with it.
You must be a person willing to be 'bigger'. That said, blatant insults are not allowed, and you'll be called out. You must be able to distinguish between an over the top joke and an insult. As many of the former sound to many like the latter.
'I hear your mom is the biggest ha***or in the U.S., but at least she's cheap' and 'So and so is a f****t, I hate him' are two completely different messages. If you can't distinguish between the two, you may be lacking the mental chops necessary to be a part of the TÅF, and should look elsewhere
You will be part of the TÅ family, as such you treat all your fellow TÅF members with respect.
If you refuse to raid when able to, we don't want you. If you don't like a fight, don't join. If you are inactive, don't join. If you are looking to fight anyone just because you can, we don't want you. If losing your defense and playing with none for up to a year is too much for you, don't join. If you don't plan on playing much longer, don't join.
If you roll like we do, and none of this stuff bothers you, you meet the TÅ test, are a quality player, and we're very interested in hearing from YOU!
You will be added to the family and be amongst a deep list of long time hardcore SGW players that also feel the same way.
Remember, it's not always about where you are at, it's where you want to be and what you are willing to do to strive for greatness. We understand that you may be new, or took a year break, or were never in an alliance, or an alliance that couldn't help flesh out your skills. Size does not always equate skill and determination. You'll have your chance to practice and increase your skills, to use your determination to grab the glory that will be yours. It's not easy, but nothing good ever is.
Save the bull for somewhere else, our perceptions of reality are attuned to reality, thus the lack of GC bull coming out of our players. Only the weak believe it. Our power comes from embracing reality, and dealing with it in a superior fashion.color=yellow](I have to say, this bit amused me the most..)
Stop by our forums and fill out a Application.
http://taurialliance.smfforfree2.comFor More Information please Contact one of the Following:
TÅ HC:
Mathlord:
MathlordSGW@hotmail.comNox:
ricvkokas@hotmail.comManetheren:
manetherenta@hotmail.comThe O-Neill:
thedanieljackson@hotmail.comVendetta:
adam_adam@msn.comDirty Harry:
ascendedreaper@hotmail.comKSM:
shaggy50187@hotmail.com
OK! So! The opening post of the TAM declares war on NS thread...is..
Wherub wrote:reason Jordan Sullivan
Turkeyman then asked,
Turkey_man wrote:What did Jordan Sullivan do?
arkangel13 wrote:Im not surrrr. (Fell asleep) maybe cause we neeee(fell asleep) damn i fell so COMAtose tonight.
A direct implication, by someone who was not around at the time, at why the TAM were attackingVendetta wrote:Well maybe your member should have picked a time when they did have stats to annoy them. Timing isn't their fault. Would you rather they waited 10 years for the war to be over before starting this? But then, that would just be countered with a "that reason is so old" BS.
TATS leader.. seems to have no clue, what the reason is, he boils it down to JS annoying you... XD
Glennwood wrote:Another reason, you guy love giving aid and comfort to our enemies.. Harbor them all you want it will only make us rich.
Directly states that their first reason is not to do with us harbouring an FUALL officer/supporter.Mathlord wrote:She FAKED A COMA. And used said faking to get resources for her account. Who forgets these things? Plus she's a FUA officer, among other things.
Again.. seem's the main reason for this war is made clear, and we've started to add in the facts that there may be a few other reasons..I think this clears up the 'why we're fighting' question doesn't it?Admittedly, the entire argument with the TAM directly stating it was because of her act on the coma was deleted and removed by Clarkey because of how vicious it got, however.. I am sure he wouldn't mind giving me the low down on msn, and I can always post the chat logs to testify what was said... As for a point on bullying..Clarkey wrote:Can we keep this thread to what is happening ingame with this WAR.
Please cease the "bullying" of Universe. What she did in the past should remain in the past.
Last warning, anymore bullying and warnings will be issued.
5 ) The abuse of other users whether through verbal attacks on their character, threats against them as a person or attacks on another’s race / gender / ethnicity or other minority status are prohibited on these boards.
Well he is certainly not referring to Nemesis bullying our own members!
Qacol wrote:This war in my eyes is all because of Jordan. She's been massed and farmed and will not leave you. So I ~Qacol~ had this war started because of that reason.
Is trying to force someone to leave an alliance a respectable, non bullying action?Qacol wrote:Ashu you just cost SOUL there def's- There now targets.
TA ~Massers~ SOUL alliance is now a target too.
Ashu the 10 mill man army with the big mouth.
~Qacol~
Erm.. have you seen the size of SOUL? So what Ashu came and gave his support and defended his friends, those guys are tiny to you all in comparison. In what world is resorting to attacking them ingame NOT bullying? They had nothing to do with the war save those comments...arkangel wrote:wow u can sure post horse crap. how about u and cripple boy go play with each other
Nice...apparently you guys fought honourably and all that? Cripple boy? Bullying? R/L slating..doesn't seem to follow the mandate tbh!arkangel wrote:You speak in a physical sense yet I mean in a mental sense.
but pappy beat NS to what i built last night.
Again, another point to make honest men out of you.. oh wait! maybe not..
It should be noted arkangel actually got banned at this point for his third forum warning for insulting another player...good old TA mandate!Of course, however.. before jack saw that personal/r-l, insult arkangel got many more in i counted at least five others in separate post's...one of the worse being..see pages 20-21.. arkangel wrote:yay CB2s daddy is proud of him. yay does he change ur bib too or are you able to do it all on ur own.
go CB2 your the man if you cant do it i bet a 4 year old can.
After that, Qacol got banned for a r/l insult..again.. we're right on target with that mandate arn't we!!!
Qacol also went cross server to Origins not long after these events...Qacol wrote:Yes ark needed to get banned-
Nice support for their members there! However.. that's a bit of a toofer isn't it! We're seeing some honesty, but at the same time a TA LEADER admitting the calibre of actions submitted to the forums by one of their memebers..Qacol wrote:I sent out pm to all TA ~Massers~ not to hit Nemesis Quarter.
Obviously good proof, the Nem Q were not part of the war. They were being hit though...Qacol wrote:The HC of the TAM have add the NQ into the TAM vs NS war.
Vote 3 yes to 1 no. I voted no.
~Qacol~
The Q, had nothing to do with the war..
It was there, but Whereub has quite nicely deleted his post, that the NQ were added to the war because Tyber and Myself declared war on the GE due to TAM's ineffectiveness...I might still have the ingame PM's to prove this one.. *fingers crossed*
ah ha... here we are.. screen shots will be available upon request, but I will probably post them later anyway...Qacol wrote:My HC did not like your GE war and comments made about the TAM.
So the HC voted 3 to 1 to hit NQ.
There being massed by members now.
~Qacol~
Is that not picking on innocent parties? Let me answer for you, yes.. yes it is...I add in all credit to Qacol, personally at this point, he did say the war again NQ would end after a week, but it never happened..at least he had the good intention, but not the motivation..Wherub wrote:when did you get new leaders?

As a very honourable reply to universes post...
Do I need to post more? Have I made my point? Are you ready to admit...you were wrong? You know what I don't actually care if you admit it now.. there is enough proof there from your members quotes...
You know what though TA? It's ok to be the bad guys...it's ok to be the liars...well, it's not.. but you seem to think it's ok.
Oh.. what was this? Another example of how a God works? maybe..maybe not.. *opens arms to allow lab coat to flow* the lord does work in his divine and mysterious ways...I rest my case, I close my statement.. the argument is over...
sweet dreams kiddies!
*glides off down the hall with lab coat billowing, after a few meters he jumps into the air and clicks his heels before doing a graceful twirl, displaying his huge grin once more and then continuing down the corridor casually waving behind him whilst not looking*Ace Ventura wrote:OHHHHHHH!!!! And thats the game!
Can you feel it? Ah! Ha! CAN! YOU FEEL IT!
La-hooo-sa-loooo-Zer!

Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:13 pm
by Mathlord
Well I got to hand it to you Semper. You turned your sorry excuse for an argument into an essay about your sorry excuse for an argument. High! Five!
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:31 pm
by semper
Mathlord wrote:Well I got to hand it to you Semper. You turned your sorry excuse for an argument into an essay about your sorry excuse for an argument. High! Five!
I'll take that as your surrender to my point. No counters, just a pure insult post... yeapt. Pretty much a final cherry on top of the whole point..[sarcasm]my oh so 'great, honourable, non bullying opponent'...

[/sarcasm]
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:13 pm
by qacol
Semper,
Just think for a sec- We don't care what you think. Your a farm and caused all your members to be farms. You had a chance and it's gone.
Now sit back and act like an ear of corn and get picked.
~Qacol~