Page 5 of 12

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:14 pm
by Scenester
Kikaz wrote:Deny getting fed to my own alliance members? lol

Who do you thinks doing the feeding? #-o

Sorry didn't really bother with the rest of your post..
@ General Riveria

Kikaz wrote:Lulz.


Look I can post bold quotes too!



Riveria didn't want to believe it, so dunno what you told him but it worked.

You didn't bother because you don't have an argument.
Sucks when someone does speaks out their minds right?
Boy do you care!

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:15 pm
by Quina Quen
Well Ben, well done for being a royally smug bar steward. I remember the time when you were actually a very easy going person back in AB, happy just to be here, and look what a combination of this game and your arrogance did to you. You used to be humble.

Scen - not quite sure what your last post means/implies.

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:28 pm
by Scenester
General Riviera wrote:Well Ben, well done for being a royally smug bar steward. I remember the time when you were actually a very easy going person back in AB, happy just to be here, and look what a combination of this game and your arrogance did to you. You used to be humble.

Scen - not quite sure what your last post means/implies.


''
I was looking at the latest incident with a presumption that it was the first - however I will take your word for it in this instance.
''

Took me quite some messages/explaining/proof before you took my word for it.

--------------------------------------------------
But hey look at me im Kikaz, i dont care about this game at all tudududu oh wait, SOMEONE DARES TO CRITICIZE ME??!?!? *Bam* sab * sab* I care so little about this! * sab * sab *
Ahh let me get my friends to increase my UP and lets spend dozens of dollars on this game I TOTALLY dont care about!
OMG someone dares to write my way of playing this game on the forums, AND I TOTALLY DONTT CARE ABOUT IT.
So Ill just mass, to shut them up, because whatever they say is something I TOTALLY DONT CARE ABOUT, so little in fact that ill just spend even more cash on this in the future.
Just because I dont care!
---------------------------------------------------

Im done, kthnxbye.

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:50 pm
by Kikaz
Scenester wrote:

Riveria didn't want to believe it, so dunno what you told him but it worked.

You didn't bother because you don't have an argument.
Sucks when someone does speaks out their minds right?
Boy do you care!

An argument for what, the rest of it's you brain storming what everyone already knows..

Lemme splain it..

Yes, I've donated this era.
Yes, I've been fed.
No, I don't honestly care about hurting another persons feelings over the internet.
Yes, declaring peace will hurt less than a war/war - war/neutral setting.
Okay, I will sit on you.
No, I don't really care your just the one complaining the most and I get a lot of humor out of it.


General Riviera wrote:Well Ben, well done for being a royally smug bar steward. I remember the time when you were actually a very easy going person back in AB, happy just to be here, and look what a combination of this game and your arrogance did to you. You used to be humble.

Why thank you, kind sir, coming from someone such as yourself who doesn't know me at all, the words you typed with your keyboard really mean a lot!

After nearly 7 years of playing this game, SGW as a whole every server, helping shape it, spending hours in private chat with admin helping fix bugs, beta testing, modding on forums, pushing the limits on every server, massing the 'unmassable', sitting at rank 1 in every server for months on end.. You get extremely bored to the point where your logging in less than once a week. At that point you can do one of two things.

1.) Quit the game and take the standing $2,500 offer on your account.
2.) Leave your alliance of the past two years as acting leader, stop caring, create a new alliance, cut off all ties. Start massing all the people you wanted to mass but couldn't because you cared to much about what would happen to your friends if you did.. Do away with all the NAPs and farming agreements, truly enforce a 1 hit mass policy. etc. etc.

I chose option two obviously, left MaYHeM as acting leader, changed my name to Misery in main, found six friends just as crazy as I was who also changed their names and together we thrive by tormenting others. It's no secret, MOST of the Community/Server already knows this.

Oh noes I lost some E-rep, but I'm enjoying myself thoroughly and posts and topics such just fuel my ego and create more lulz. #-o

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 9:51 pm
by Retribution
Kikaz wrote:After nearly 7 years of playing this game, SGW as a whole every server, helping shape it, spending hours in private chat with admin helping fix bugs, beta testing, modding on forums, pushing the limits on every server, massing the 'unmassable', sitting at rank 1 in every server for months on end...


Oh boy, that made me LOL. The highest you've ever finished in Quantum was 5th in the Old School Rulez, and as I recall, you hardly led that Era at all! Congratulations on creating the funniest joke I've ever read... Oh wait, you were serious? :shock:

The funniest part about all of this, is that you actually think you are "hurting people's feelings" on here. The only thing you've been hurting is the integrity of this game. So don't act like your some visionary who helped to build the game. :smt043

The greatest thing about all of this? You're barely in the top-30 of the QL, and you don't even deserve to be mentioned alongside any of those true legends like ETL, 12ag, HE, Zaphor, Hipster or even King4Day (Fury to some) or Bahamut, who barely even played Q.

And did you seriously pass on $2.5k for your account?? If so, then you are either richer than southern sweet tea or madder than hatter. Either way: it would explain a lot. :smt047

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 11:46 pm
by HippyFool
To be honest I don't know what you are all complaining about.

Isn't it common knowledge that Kikaz comes to Q every couple of waves and trolls the crap out of everyone both ingame and on forums and then bails, awaiting his next surprise visit?

Personally I am just happy to see the forums so active :smt081

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:04 am
by Scenester
Well Im glad I can keep someone entertained, and will keep on doing so that if it makes you stay :razz:
Last era the only messages I got were peace declartions and ''whyyyy'' now Im actually getting threats, plenty already.

Its really starting to look like a war game now instead of a text version of ''farmville'' which is what I complained about other era's Hahhaha.

Now what should be done to make this era even more interesting so we not only keep the oldbie's in but also attract new players... :-k
Now like 5 fred accounts are gone we got gabs to fill...

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:15 am
by R0B3RT
Kikaz wrote:
Scenester wrote:

Riveria didn't want to believe it, so dunno what you told him but it worked.

You didn't bother because you don't have an argument.
Sucks when someone does speaks out their minds right?
Boy do you care!

An argument for what, the rest of it's you brain storming what everyone already knows..

Lemme splain it..

Yes, I've donated this era.
Yes, I've been fed.
No, I don't honestly care about hurting another persons feelings over the internet.
Yes, declaring peace will hurt less than a war/war - war/neutral setting.
Okay, I will sit on you.
No, I don't really care your just the one complaining the most and I get a lot of humor out of it.


General Riviera wrote:Well Ben, well done for being a royally smug bar steward. I remember the time when you were actually a very easy going person back in AB, happy just to be here, and look what a combination of this game and your arrogance did to you. You used to be humble.

Why thank you, kind sir, coming from someone such as yourself who doesn't know me at all, the words you typed with your keyboard really mean a lot!

After nearly 7 years of playing this game, SGW as a whole every server, helping shape it, spending hours in private chat with admin helping fix bugs, beta testing, modding on forums, pushing the limits on every server, massing the 'unmassable', sitting at rank 1 in every server for months on end.. You get extremely bored to the point where your logging in less than once a week. At that point you can do one of two things.

1.) Quit the game and take the standing $2,500 offer on your account.
2.) Leave your alliance of the past two years as acting leader, stop caring, create a new alliance, cut off all ties. Start massing all the people you wanted to mass but couldn't because you cared to much about what would happen to your friends if you did.. Do away with all the NAPs and farming agreements, truly enforce a 1 hit mass policy. etc. etc.

I chose option two obviously, left MaYHeM as acting leader, changed my name to Misery in main, found six friends just as crazy as I was who also changed their names and together we thrive by tormenting others. It's no secret, MOST of the Community/Server already knows this.

Oh noes I lost some E-rep, but I'm enjoying myself thoroughly and posts and topics such just fuel my ego and create more lulz. #-o

wait compliment don.t ask for
some$ on credit card don.t make you the best in this game never $ player win here for long time
and feed time is gone in quantum we fight to eliminate and you come now with free uu from your friends ba go AWAYdon.t disturbe :smt093
a good player don.t take ss on 1 week :smt019

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:11 am
by Retribution
HippyFool wrote:To be honest I don't know what you are all complaining about.

Isn't it common knowledge that Kikaz comes to Q every couple of waves and trolls the crap out of everyone both ingame and on forums and then bails, awaiting his next surprise visit?

Personally I am just happy to see the forums so active :smt081


Yeah, I just like to get some entertainment from all this. He's like a black-sheep relative that shows up expecting you to welcome them into your house, and then they drink all your good beverages and raid your fridge. #-o

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:57 pm
by Kikaz
Retribution wrote:
Kikaz wrote:After nearly 7 years of playing this game, SGW as a whole every server, helping shape it, spending hours in private chat with admin helping fix bugs, beta testing, modding on forums, pushing the limits on every server, massing the 'unmassable', sitting at rank 1 in every server for months on end...


Oh boy, that made me LOL. The highest you've ever finished in Quantum was 5th in the Old School Rulez, and as I recall, you hardly led that Era at all! Congratulations on creating the funniest joke I've ever read... Oh wait, you were serious? :shock:

The funniest part about all of this, is that you actually think you are "hurting people's feelings" on here. The only thing you've been hurting is the integrity of this game. So don't act like your some visionary who helped to build the game. :smt043

The greatest thing about all of this? You're barely in the top-30 of the QL, and you don't even deserve to be mentioned alongside any of those true legends like ETL, 12ag, HE, Zaphor, Hipster or even King4Day (Fury to some) or Bahamut, who barely even played Q.

And did you seriously pass on $2.5k for your account?? If so, then you are either richer than southern sweet tea or madder than hatter. Either way: it would explain a lot. :smt047


Touch a nerve did I?


Era 9 Rank 5 Owned. 61,987 billion 1,722 billion 36
Era 12 Rank 2 Owned.
Era 13 Rank 3 Owned. 38,761 trillion 1,436 trillion 27
Era 14 Rank 3 Owned. 133,539 billion 3,815 billion 35
Era 15 Rank 2 Owned. 34,133 trillion 1,365 trillion 25
Era 16 Rank 2 Owned. 9,952 trillion 765,573 billion 13
Era 17 Rank 5 Owned. 10,927 trillion 520,355 billion 21
Era 18 Rank 1 Owned. 808,819 trillion 38,515 trillion 2
Era 19 Rank 2 Owned. 33,009 billion 1,572 billion 21
Era 20 Rank 1 Tormented. 593,298 billion 98,883 billion 6
Era 21 Rank 1 Owned. 605,788 billion 31,884 billion 19
Era 22 Rank 1 Owned. 38,255 quadrillion 1,822 quadrillion 21
Era 23 Rank 3 Owned. 1,204 quadrillion 133,829 trillion 9
Era 24 Rank 4 Owned. 1,675,946,139,967 quadrillion 209,493,267,496 quadrillion 8
Era 25 Rank 1 Owned. 167,451 quadrillion 16,745 quadrillion 10


Hmm whats that? Founder/Leader of the most successful alliance Quantum ever had?

Era 11 Rank 5 Overall
Era 12 Rank 9 Overall



Many other waves, I was massed out in the last few minutes, notice defense and mothership ranks compared to other ranks..

For example look at the glory I had Era 13 and 22, I led the entire waves both times till close to the end..

Era 9 Rank 8 Commander
Era 12 Rank 3 Commander
Era 13 Rank 7 Commander
Era 15 Rank 2 Commander
Era 16 Rank 1 Commander
Era 18 Rank 2 Commander



But yes, I played against and warred all of those names, last time I actively played Quantum a year and a half ago, I was rank 8 all time with 12ag and ETL ahead of me by less than 5k G&R.

'And as I recall' you obviously wearn't there old school era look at my glory that wave compared to everyone else's, I led it the entire wave and was being massed by five people in the last turn of the game (No nox, no crit that era) notice the defense rank of 31 and finishing rank 5... Hippy barely passed me on glory by finishing higher that wave and smoosh was fed to an untouchable defense by 12 accounts a week before the wave ended lol.

Also back then until about 2 years ago, OVER 200 active accounts ONLINE at any given time..

Not less than 30 TOTAL players..

And where are you in the legends?

Oh wait, your not... ;)

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:38 pm
by Retribution
Kikaz wrote:Touch a nerve did I?


Nope. I just think it's hilarious. :D

Kikaz wrote:'And as I recall' you obviously wearn't there old school era

Oh, I was there. I didn't used to play for rank on Q. My Main game was, well, Main, and I used to use Q to just blow off steam.

Kikaz wrote:Also back then until about 2 years ago, OVER 200 active accounts ONLINE at any given time..


The glory days. O', how we miss them. *R.I.P*

Kikaz wrote:And where are you in the legends?

Oh wait, your not... ;)


Once again, never used to play for rank, so I never racked up the GnR.
On top of that, I never claimed to be a Legend. What I did say, was that you are not one.

Also, the point about being "close to 12ag and ETL in GnR", as if GnR is the ultimate judge of skill.
No offense to Hippy-hop -- You're obviously one of the best to play the game, mate -- but just cause he's ranked highest in the Legends doesn't mean he's the best to ever play. A large chunk of that GnR came from last Era.

:smt110

My main point: Is you are acting like you're a Demigod, yet you resort to feeding. If you were even a shadow of that blown up ego of yours, you wouldn't need to be hand-fed like an infant to compete in this Era of "30-something active players" (Apparently there is only 6 active players outside our Alliance. :smt042 )

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:14 pm
by Kikaz
Again, you obviously weren't there..

Ask any of your so called 'legends', including Hippy.

I rarely played for rank, the last time I did was era 12..

I played quantum only to mass others.

Image

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:37 pm
by Retribution
Again, I was there..

Just ask my friend 'Legend'. (I honestly don't remember you at the top of that Era, so maybe that's just because it's been YEARS, IDK.)

You barely play for rank, yet you "sat for months on end" at the top of all the servers. Get your story straight. ;)

Well duhz you played for teh lulz of course. :smt042

Image

^Look! I can't post images too! :smt112

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:58 pm
by HippyFool
Kikaz wrote:
Era 9 Rank 5 Owned. 61,987 billion 1,722 billion 36
Era 12 Rank 2 Owned.
Era 13 Rank 3 Owned. 38,761 trillion 1,436 trillion 27
Era 14 Rank 3 Owned. 133,539 billion 3,815 billion 35
Era 15 Rank 2 Owned. 34,133 trillion 1,365 trillion 25
Era 16 Rank 2 Owned. 9,952 trillion 765,573 billion 13
Era 17 Rank 5 Owned. 10,927 trillion 520,355 billion 21
Era 18 Rank 1 Owned. 808,819 trillion 38,515 trillion 2
Era 19 Rank 2 Owned. 33,009 billion 1,572 billion 21
Era 20 Rank 1 Tormented. 593,298 billion 98,883 billion 6
Era 21 Rank 1 Owned. 605,788 billion 31,884 billion 19
Era 22 Rank 1 Owned. 38,255 quadrillion 1,822 quadrillion 21
Era 23 Rank 3 Owned. 1,204 quadrillion 133,829 trillion 9
Era 24 Rank 4 Owned. 1,675,946,139,967 quadrillion 209,493,267,496 quadrillion 8
Era 25 Rank 1 Owned. 167,451 quadrillion 16,745 quadrillion 10


Hmm whats that? Founder/Leader of the most successful alliance Quantum ever had?


Hmm [-X

Era 13 Rank 2 The Crazy Chickens 1,602 quadrillion 534,081 trillion 3
Era 14 Rank 2 The Crazy Chickens 800,645 billion 400,322 billion 2
Era 15 Rank 1 The Crazy Chickens 137,115 trillion 17,139 trillion 8
Era 16 Rank 1 The Crazy Chickens 19,249 trillion 3,208 trillion 6
Era 17 Rank 1 The Crazy Chickens 125,960 trillion 20,993 trillion 6
Era 20 Rank 3 The Crazy Chickens 431,455 billion 71,909 billion 6
Era 21 Rank 3 The Crazy Chickens 230,016 billion 57,504 billion 4
Era 22 Rank 3 The Crazy Chickens 11,684 quadrillion 2,921 quadrillion 4
Era 23 Rank 2 The Crazy..... 4,604 quadrillion 328,884 trillion 14
Era 26 Rank 1 [TCC] Pika Boo!! 16,728 quadrillion 1,394 quadrillion 12
Era 27 Rank 1 TCC 426,665 trillion 35,555 trillion 12
Era 28 Rank 1 Chickens Of Power! 117,993 trillion 19,666 trillion 6


Owned. are the most infamous alliance there is, but TCC has won more [-X

Kikaz wrote:Again, you obviously weren't there..

Ask any of your so called 'legends', including Hippy.

I rarely played for rank, the last time I did was era 12..

I played quantum only to mass others.

Image


He rarely plays for rank - mainly cos he gets angry at someone and masses his whole army away mid era ... and when he starts massing he just keeps going till he has nothing left and has probably pissed off half the active players :-D

Most players will agree that Kikaz certainly makes waves more interesting though.

Retribution wrote:Hippy-hop -- You're obviously one of the best to play the game, mate --


:smt060

Retribution wrote:but just cause he's ranked highest in the Legends doesn't mean he's the best to ever play. A large chunk of that GnR came from last Era.


.... :( :smt089 but, but... I was already top before that wave :smt089

...

Haha, nah just joking - I know there are plenty of better players out there than me :-)

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:20 pm
by Jimbo 5.3
Ah ha! TCC stands for "The Crazy Chickens." Case closed.