Page 5 of 16
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:43 am
by ~Thamuz~
That's me mate, HE bounced off my def twice so had to go to DDE for help, moral of the story is...... if you can't take a def whilst the person is sound asleep and obviously offline with an account that a crap load of money has been spent on then you might as well quit. Congrats to ~Guerrero~ for taking my def, not so much congrats to the bottom feeder HE who just cleaned up after him, disappointed me if I'm honest, OA make this big ole thread about taking all unaligned defs but have DDE come in when its to much. Obviously history reapeats. EPIC FAIL
![[043.gif] :smt043](./images/smilies/043.gif)
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:04 am
by atok
what a bunch of **Filtered**
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:29 am
by InR
~Thamuz~ wrote:
That's me mate, HE bounced off my def twice so had to go to DDE for help, moral of the story is...... if you can't take a def whilst the person is sound asleep and obviously offline with an account that a crap load of money has been spent on then you might as well quit. Congrats to ~Guerrero~ for taking my def, not so much congrats to the bottom feeder HE who just cleaned up after him, disappointed me if I'm honest, OA make this big ole thread about taking all unaligned defs but have DDE come in when its to much. Obviously history reapeats. EPIC FAIL
![[043.gif] :smt043](./images/smilies/043.gif)
Hey mate, it's good that you came by, i was worrying that no one will belive me. And i really didnt want to give up names

But yeah i was talking about what you told me, so its you

))
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:47 am
by dastupy

Thamuz still around?

Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:59 am
by High Empty
~Thamuz~ wrote:
That's me mate, HE bounced off my def twice so had to go to DDE for help, moral of the story is...... if you can't take a def whilst the person is sound asleep and obviously offline with an account that a crap load of money has been spent on then you might as well quit. Congrats to ~Guerrero~ for taking my def, not so much congrats to the bottom feeder HE who just cleaned up after him, disappointed me if I'm honest, OA make this big ole thread about taking all unaligned defs but have DDE come in when its to much. Obviously history reapeats. EPIC FAIL
![[043.gif] :smt043](./images/smilies/043.gif)
Lol your funny
my account isn't setup to take 100 tril defense.
But i did hit you twice, i had to prove you weren't on Nox so that ~Guerrero~ would hit you. Since i believe (not sure) that you came off ppt after most of the massing was done, otherwise i would of given you to Rhett, who when down for a cat nap.
And yes DDE and Omega still do work together on something, most pointly a member who just joined DDE cause he didn't think Omega would keep him busy enough massing.
P.S
Guerrero is REALLY REALLY wanting his 700mil defense supers massed!
Or you can go after my 7mil of them.
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:00 am
by Duderanch
Big T
![[060.gif] :smt060](./images/smilies/060.gif)
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:04 am
by Zod14c
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:20 am
by ~Dä Vinci~
~Thamuz~ wrote:
That's me mate, HE bounced off my def twice so had to go to DDE for help, moral of the story is...... if you can't take a def whilst the person is sound asleep and obviously offline with an account that a crap load of money has been spent on then you might as well quit. Congrats to ~Guerrero~ for taking my def, not so much congrats to the bottom feeder HE who just cleaned up after him, disappointed me if I'm honest, OA make this big ole thread about taking all unaligned defs but have DDE come in when its to much. Obviously history reapeats. EPIC FAIL
![[043.gif] :smt043](./images/smilies/043.gif)
guerrero massed you, im disappointed in him.. cleaningup after oe. That sucks man

they also massed me offline.. can't see the fun in this, 1vs1 is so much more fun.
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:25 am
by ~Thamuz~
High Empty wrote:~Thamuz~ wrote:
That's me mate, HE bounced off my def twice so had to go to DDE for help, moral of the story is...... if you can't take a def whilst the person is sound asleep and obviously offline with an account that a crap load of money has been spent on then you might as well quit. Congrats to ~Guerrero~ for taking my def, not so much congrats to the bottom feeder HE who just cleaned up after him, disappointed me if I'm honest, OA make this big ole thread about taking all unaligned defs but have DDE come in when its to much. Obviously history reapeats. EPIC FAIL
![[043.gif] :smt043](./images/smilies/043.gif)
Lol your funny
my account isn't setup to take 100 tril defense.
But i did hit you twice, i had to prove you weren't on Nox so that ~Guerrero~ would hit you. Since i believe (not sure) that you came off ppt after most of the massing was done, otherwise i would of given you to Rhett, who when down for a cat nap.
And yes DDE and Omega still do work together on something, most pointly a member who just joined DDE cause he didn't think Omega would keep him busy enough massing.
P.S
Guerrero is REALLY REALLY wanting his 700mil defense supers massed!
Or you can go after my 7mil of them.
Spoke to Rhett and spoke to ~Guerrero~
I don't PPT, what part of my post wasn't accurate then considering no ones account is set up to take big defs unless you put the uu in?
Duderanch wrote:Big T
![[060.gif] :smt060](./images/smilies/060.gif)
![[050.gif] :smt050](./images/smilies/050.gif)
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:27 am
by ~Thamuz~
~Dä Vinci~ wrote:~Thamuz~ wrote:
That's me mate, HE bounced off my def twice so had to go to DDE for help, moral of the story is...... if you can't take a def whilst the person is sound asleep and obviously offline with an account that a crap load of money has been spent on then you might as well quit. Congrats to ~Guerrero~ for taking my def, not so much congrats to the bottom feeder HE who just cleaned up after him, disappointed me if I'm honest, OA make this big ole thread about taking all unaligned defs but have DDE come in when its to much. Obviously history reapeats. EPIC FAIL
![[043.gif] :smt043](./images/smilies/043.gif)
guerrero massed you, im disappointed in him.. cleaningup after oe. That sucks man

they also massed me offline.. can't see the fun in this, 1vs1 is so much more fun.
Don't be mate, he didn't realise he was massing me till I messaged him in the morning. He offered to help me rebuild so alls good. x
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:45 am
by Rienna
Caprila wrote:
Members from all OE alliances participated in the massings. Any reason why retaliation should stick only to OA? Other than ETL and High Empty wanting to keep all the m.e to themselves?
I know it must be hard for you to get your facts straight considering you're in a NAP'd alliance and there was nobody in your logs - but OE consists of 4 alliances of which only 2 contributed to massing the server. That was OA with some help from Delta.
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:50 am
by ~LordRse~
![[047.gif] :smt047](./images/smilies/047.gif)
Let's be gentle all.... It's the time of loving....
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 10:05 am
by Lord_Grant
Haha. good to see Omega's still the same bunch of people they were when I was playing before

Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 10:07 am
by ~Dä Vinci~
if you do this after each mass, i forgive you.
Re: OA vs the non NAPPED/DRA
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 10:07 am
by IFLuX
Lord_Grant wrote:Haha. good to see Omega's still the same bunch of people they were when I was playing before

![[sge.gif] :sge](./images/smilies/sge.gif)