StarGateWars Forums

Borek wrote:ya ya ya, top 10 and cannot take anyone down who is active, so like i said, pointless in a vendetta like this. I mean it's highly effective at stopping C2 isn't it?

And wiping a billion planets here or there is less pointless, or "highly effective at stopping c2?"

Zod14c wrote:

Borek wrote:ya ya ya, top 10 and cannot take anyone down who is active, so like i said, pointless in a vendetta like this. I mean it's highly effective at stopping C2 isn't it?

And wiping a billion planets here or there is less pointless, or "highly effective at stopping c2?"

Never said it was, but in the context of this vendetta it is a lot more effective than sitting around with a 4b+ TOC picking your nose.

Noone can stop me... except my wife. She steals my laptop

But she has boobs... Powerfull weapon. Much moooore than 10b TOC

caesar2 wrote:Noone can stop me... except my wife. She steals my laptop

But she has boobs... Powerfull weapon. Much moooore than 10b TOC

Always the can's man C2.

Borek wrote:

Zod14c wrote:

Borek wrote:ya ya ya, top 10 and cannot take anyone down who is active, so like i said, pointless in a vendetta like this. I mean it's highly effective at stopping C2 isn't it?

And wiping a billion planets here or there is less pointless, or "highly effective at stopping c2?"

Never said it was, but in the context of this vendetta it is a lot more effective than sitting around with a 4b+ TOC picking your nose.

lol you're missing the point again borek, who cares about planets on ascended

Yeah, better to waste AT's descending inactives instead Guild, spending thousands of AT's making farms unable to be farmed for a few weeks, makes perfect tactical sense, far more effective than killing planets on an active account and dropping their planet total so they cannot hit all of the best farms...

Borek wrote:Yeah, better to waste AT's descending inactives instead Guild, spending thousands of AT's making farms unable to be farmed for a few weeks, makes perfect tactical sense, far more effective than killing planets on an active account and dropping their planet total so they cannot hit all of the best farms...

not sure where you've created this idea thats what I did :S I since I had a decent TOC when at war I went after those doing damage to us who we could descend

maybe you're thinking of Odin ? borek you're not having a good day creating lies about me you're going to hurt me feeling if you're not careful

Guild wrote:

Borek wrote:Yeah, better to waste AT's descending inactives instead Guild, spending thousands of AT's making farms unable to be farmed for a few weeks, makes perfect tactical sense, far more effective than killing planets on an active account and dropping their planet total so they cannot hit all of the best farms...

not sure where you've created this idea thats what I did :S I since I had a decent TOC when at war I went after those doing damage to us who we could descend

maybe you're thinking of Odin ? borek you're not having a good day creating lies about me you're going to hurt me feeling if you're not careful

not denying you got a couple of actives here and there and a bunch more semi-actives, but 90% were inactive. Did catch you wasting AT's on me a few times in the past though, hehe

That sums up the problem with a TOC based ascended account though, you need an active player to have real life issues to catch them out with a descension in most cases. Sometimes you can get lucky if you have a monster TOC, but more often than not you get them 1 hit away and they refill and you've wasted 4-500 AT's effectively on nothing.

Borek wrote:not denying you got a couple of actives here and there and a bunch more semi-actives, but 90% were inactive. Did catch you wasting AT's on me a few times in the past though, hehe

pray tell ? which inactives and when , because I have no idea who you think Ive descended who's inactive

you talking out your ass with no evidence is most entertaining borek

What do you refer to as inactives ?

Just because an active player on main forgets to log into ascended, doesn't make him inactive.

-KJ

Guild wrote:

Borek wrote:not denying you got a couple of actives here and there and a bunch more semi-actives, but 90% were inactive. Did catch you wasting AT's on me a few times in the past though, hehe

pray tell ? which inactives and when , because I have no idea who you think Ive descended who's inactive

you talking out your ass with no evidence is most entertaining borek

lol do not have figures from over a year ago at hand, but of course you are free to list all these active players you've descended to prove your point...

Borek wrote:

Guild wrote:

Borek wrote:not denying you got a couple of actives here and there and a bunch more semi-actives, but 90% were inactive. Did catch you wasting AT's on me a few times in the past though, hehe

pray tell ? which inactives and when , because I have no idea who you think Ive descended who's inactive

you talking out your ass with no evidence is most entertaining borek

lol do not have figures from over a year ago at hand, but of course you are free to list all these active players you've descended to prove your point...

You are the one throwing accusations around. Make a case for yourself.

Borek wrote:

Guild wrote:

Borek wrote:not denying you got a couple of actives here and there and a bunch more semi-actives, but 90% were inactive. Did catch you wasting AT's on me a few times in the past though, hehe

pray tell ? which inactives and when , because I have no idea who you think Ive descended who's inactive

you talking out your ass with no evidence is most entertaining borek

lol do not have figures from over a year ago at hand, but of course you are free to list all these active players you've descended to prove your point...

never have been other bothered about boasting about doing my duty for my alliance in regards to massing and descending, I just do it

since you have no shred of worth in what you say, Im happy knowing you're just another sore fool

Why do i have to prove what Guild has done?

Hell just go to the current DDE TL war thread and anyone can scroll back and see Dustin_Eh himself state that it's counter-productive to go after the active members, i am quite sure he would admit himself that he was extremely lucky to get R8 and that was due to RL issues.

I have no problem with people spinning descensions to mean more than they actually do, but the whole point is TOC based accounts are pretty worthless when it really comes down to it. The number of times an active war-monger is descended in a war is pretty low. of course there are some notable exceptions to every rule, heck Robert himself has been caught out, so i'm not saying it can't happen, but in the context of this Vendetta thread, and wars in general, you can do a lot more damage with an account like Thor's than you can with an account like the one Guild used to own.

And i am not surprised Guild, you can't prove anything, never have been able to back up your trolling lol.

There's no reason to go after anyone that refills constantly. But we have went after players that do and they slip. Sometimes they slip in round 3... or 4. Or after a year. But they do.

Warring is expensive - but fun. So who cares.