StarGateWars Forums

Agreed.

Better yet, remove raiding, resource trades, and the market.

but I dont see that happening either.

And while they're at it, remove the attack button and put in a request form, so you can state why you want to attack the person, for how long you want to attack and what you hope tp gain from the attack, you can then wait for aproval and no one can say you were in the wrong.

Also, we could cut out the private message system, people shouldn't be allowed to talk privately anyway.


Planets should all have numbers instead of names, certificates of ownership and serial numbers.


Alliances shouldn't be allowed to become strong, if they get to a certain power, all members of that alliance should have their accounts reset because power corrupts.


Nobody should be allowed to have more officers than anyone else because that's just not fair.


All officers should be of equal skill and power for each person.


UP should only be allowed to be upgraded by the admin so nobody gets more than anyone else.


Attack turns should be requested by email in triplicate to Admin, Game MOD and the desgnated attack turn dispencer for that day, and the designated attack turn dispencer should be decided by a weekly lottery that enters all id's, if it picks an inactive account, nobody gets attack turns...

That's all I can think of now.


Should this thread be moved to suggestions now?

Lore wrote:

Mattwell wrote:

Inferno™ wrote:
Who's being abused? You mean the 1 unsuccesful attack made on pianomuts account? lol

In this world even attacking with 1 AT can get someone put on a traitor list and massed 5 months later.

good one Matt

Just poiting out how one group went to the wall to punish one person who used 1 AT on their member, yet nothing in this situation. Maybe it isnt as bad as they thought to use 1AT to attack on an ally or maybe it was the people involved and never really the 1AT used.

Oh, replijake, so what your basically saying is that its okay to cheat and for people to just be allowed to get away with it?

or are you just acting like a jackass for the sake of it?

just4laughs wrote:Oh, replijake, so what your basically saying is that its okay to cheat and for people to just be allowed to get away with it?

or are you just acting like a jackass for the sake of it?

I'm quite sure I never mentioned cheating, I was merely commenting on someones suggestion, I never condone cheating.

Saying that this forum is ignored and should just be deleted helps so much too...


I trust the admin and or Game Mod to deal with this as they see it should be dealt with.

You were belittling the subject of the conversation.

And are you suggesting we should have unwavering faith that admin always knows exactly whats best. He's just some guy, he can do stuff wrong, that doesn't matter, but if he's doing something I see as wrong, I want to point it out so maybe he will take it into account and change it. After all the main content of this game is interaction of the players themselves.

And at the end of the day Fourm is just another player (NOTE: If you know his ingame do NOT Post it here as he does not deserve that)

Mattwell wrote:

Lore wrote:

Mattwell wrote:

Inferno™ wrote:
Who's being abused? You mean the 1 unsuccesful attack made on pianomuts account? lol

In this world even attacking with 1 AT can get someone put on a traitor list and massed 5 months later.

good one Matt

Just poiting out how one group went to the wall to punish one person who used 1 AT on their member, yet nothing in this situation. Maybe it isnt as bad as they thought to use 1AT to attack on an ally or maybe it was the people involved and never really the 1AT used.

My point had nothing to do with that. It was simply a good come back.

RepliJake wrote:And while they're at it, remove the attack button and put in a request form, so you can state why you want to attack the person, for how long you want to attack and what you hope tp gain from the attack, you can then wait for aproval and no one can say you were in the wrong.

Also, we could cut out the private message system, people shouldn't be allowed to talk privately anyway.


Planets should all have numbers instead of names, certificates of ownership and serial numbers.


Alliances shouldn't be allowed to become strong, if they get to a certain power, all members of that alliance should have their accounts reset because power corrupts.


Nobody should be allowed to have more officers than anyone else because that's just not fair.


All officers should be of equal skill and power for each person.


UP should only be allowed to be upgraded by the admin so nobody gets more than anyone else.


Attack turns should be requested by email in triplicate to Admin, Game MOD and the desgnated attack turn dispencer for that day, and the designated attack turn dispencer should be decided by a weekly lottery that enters all id's, if it picks an inactive account, nobody gets attack turns...

That's all I can think of now.


Should this thread be moved to suggestions now?

lmao. thats made my day.

but you forgot about irradicating the ranking system...since its not fair having a higher rank jake, you should know that

RepliJake wrote:And while they're at it, remove the attack button and put in a request form, so you can state why you want to attack the person, for how long you want to attack and what you hope tp gain from the attack, you can then wait for aproval and no one can say you were in the wrong.

Also, we could cut out the private message system, people shouldn't be allowed to talk privately anyway.


Planets should all have numbers instead of names, certificates of ownership and serial numbers.


Alliances shouldn't be allowed to become strong, if they get to a certain power, all members of that alliance should have their accounts reset because power corrupts.


Nobody should be allowed to have more officers than anyone else because that's just not fair.


All officers should be of equal skill and power for each person.


UP should only be allowed to be upgraded by the admin so nobody gets more than anyone else.


Attack turns should be requested by email in triplicate to Admin, Game MOD and the desgnated attack turn dispencer for that day, and the designated attack turn dispencer should be decided by a weekly lottery that enters all id's, if it picks an inactive account, nobody gets attack turns...

That's all I can think of now.


Should this thread be moved to suggestions now?

im not sure which is better. S T I sig, or this one

So, with forum finally having visited the forum, are we going to get an answer to whether the forum admin has infact cheated, and tehrefore should be banned, or shall we just put this matter to rest and say, well, we could have had a clear and open judgement but instead, we'lll let this glaring omission of vindication from forum lurk here untill we get yet another example of discrepencies in the ingame judgement system.

You forgot the [quote="Tok'ra"][/quote]

I have never talked to tok'ra directly, i find it offensive that you assume I can't have a backbone of my own.

OK look ,

Psi used a sanctioned secodn account in an unsanctioned manner, he was thus punished via stripping of that account from his possession.

As for the breach of the DD/Omega treaty , Bill was repaid by psi his 0 Naq and 0 UU damage done upon him , and if he wasnt id gladly pay up on psi's behalf, taking into consideratino the time difference , the damages x100 , ok no problem i can handle, that ...

I just sent bill 0 naq and 0 uu , there ya go all paid off, all ship shape.

DD/Omega treaty is all setteled, unfortuantly tok'ra you wont be able to start a war with Omega and DD over this debt because i just cleared it , and very generously if i do say so myself, 100 times the original damages that could have been paid back at the time aswell

And as for preaching Psi's "wrong" of breachign treaties, you massed psi several times whilst under the banner of DD's Ally, and unlike Psi you actually did a little more than 1 massively defended attack now didnt you , you sir are not only a hipocrit but a terrorrist.

...

And to make one simple point.

It is stupidly unlikely that Psi will be banned as Admin said he wil lnto as he is a super mod, e.t.c e.t.c , like it is stupid that EtL will be banned for getting or using admin powers to i.p scan accounts which is probably the case. 99% sure of that , not that i care, it doesnt do much.